Posted on 03/18/2015 10:01:24 AM PDT by raptor22
mailgate: The refusal of State Department spokesperson Jen Psaki to answer a simple yes or no question — did Hillary Clinton sign separation form OF-109? — is proof of a cover-up of a felony by the former secretary of state.
You'd think that if Clinton didn't sign separation form OF-109 or was not asked to, the State Department and Team Hillary would have just said so.
After all, it would be easier to deflect questions about getting special treatment than acknowledging the committing of a felony by essentially lying under oath with the false claim that you have returned all government materials in your possession, including your emails.
As former DOJ lawyer Shannen Coffin first pointed out, OF-109 is more than a promise that you have not absconded with some office supplies.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...
HILLARY FOR PRISON 2016 PING
Hillary’s OF-109 is right next to Kerry’s SF-180.
What goes around comes around....
HILLARY RODHAM NIXON PING
Yes, well....
I thought Jen Psaki’s announcement that “there is no record that the form was signed by Hillary Clinton” was a little suspicious.
WTH does that mean?
What is a “record” in Jen’s mind?
Does “no record” mean no evidence, does it mean no hard copy?
Was this particular exit form missing entirely from the file, or was it in the file, but left unsigned?
Where did the form go?
Did Clinton take the damn thing with her?
Was the exit form even among her separation folder?
Did Rice and Powell receive the exact same form, or nothing at all similar, or nothing at all period?
They are hiding something. Jen was entirely squirming.
2008-04-01... For some reason I get the feeling that an April Fool’s Day article is not going to be readily accepted as an immediately valid reference source.
Monica Lewinsky’s ex-boyfriend’s wife for prison notice!
“No record of her signing the form.” - Psaki
Translation - if there is ANY meaning to that dodge whatsoever, it is, Hilliary (tm) was not recorded as she signed the form.
Slick’s saga and subsequent impeachment clearly demonstrated that the Clinton’s are immune to charges of perjury, along with most other high crimes and misdemeanors.
Not if you’re a liberal. Consequences are illegal for liberals.
[For some reason I get the feeling that an April Fool’s Day article is not going to be readily accepted as an immediately valid reference source.]
When it comes to Hillary Clinton and justice, every day is April Fool’s Day.
After I put a document through a shredder and burn it, "there is no record." She was parsing and spinning big time.
The one thing that I haven’t seen mentioned about this is - The Secretary of State is the 4th person down in the Presidential succession list.
This makes her e-mails and other forms of communications a top priority for foreign intelligence services. Additionally she travels, to foreign countries, as much - if not more - as the current President does. That makes hacking of her e-mails and other forms of electronic and physical communications much easier.
I wonder if the person who hid that form - destroyed it - and if they did - did they consider they just committed a FELONY - FOR WHICH YOU GO TO JAIL.
I believe it’s called “Tampering with and Destroying a Govt Document”.
Was it Harf or Psaki ?
This whole thing with Hillary’s email is an attempt to explain how the terrorist knew Steven was going to be in Benghazi on 9/11/12.
Since only 2 people, Hillary and Obama, could guarantee Stevens was in Benghazi on that day they are trying to convince people Hillary’s email security was so lacking anyone could hack in and get any information.
Small problem for Hillary, after her so called assassination attempt in 2009 the Secret Service would have made sure her email was secure.
If security is now lacking on her email, Hillary had it removed.
My recollection is that Bill was indeed convicted of perjury and had to forfeit his law license. I thought he also paid a hefty fine.
Apparently, the consequences were insufficient to alter behavior. Bill and Hillary are too knowledgeable of the system to let themselves be put in a position to suffer in a severe way.
Not to them. Neither does the Bill of Rights, following the law, defending the Constitution... Thanks raptor22.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.