Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No hate crime charges in St. Louis (black-on-white) beating
CNN via 4029TV.com ^ | 04/01/2015 | Ed Payne and Ralph Ellis

Posted on 04/01/2015 6:51:59 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

(CNN) —There will be no hate crime charges for two males arrested in the beating of a man that may have been sparked by a question about the 2014 shooting of Michael Brown.

St. Louis police have charged Ronald Williams, 21, with assault. A 15-year-old has also been arrested, according to authorities.

There had been speculation that the suspects might be charged with a hate crime because the victim was white and the people who attacked him were black. And because the punches were thrown following the Michael Brown reference.

But that won't be happening.

(Excerpt) Read more at 4029tv.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: assault; bidenvoters; blackmales; missouri
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 04/01/2015 6:51:59 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.


2 posted on 04/01/2015 6:53:52 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Well, while it’s obviously a bias crime (since it was a beatdown without robbery), a charge enhancement for the 3 on 1 unproked attack would do the trick.

Hate crime charges are so subjective as an enhancement that they are useless political toys for the prosecutor.


3 posted on 04/01/2015 6:56:31 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

It is outrageous what the spokesman said about why they do not want to charge this as a hate crime too.

We are going into anarchy right now.

Blacks are attacking whites for no reason and homosexuals with their media and big business are bullying Christians.
Do you notice how they don’t mention muslims, Jews, Hindu’s?

This is a war against the founding of this country and Christians which the homosexuals have always hated.

I don’t buy into this crap by some saying they are Christian but then attack the freedom of religion.


4 posted on 04/01/2015 6:56:45 AM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Wow! White guys may as well have a “kick me hard”, “make fun of me”, “take my money”, “I’m privileged” sign around their necks.


5 posted on 04/01/2015 6:57:18 AM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

How can it be a hate crime if it was only a white man getting beaten by blacks?

/s

Think it’s bad for whites now?

Just wait until most of the law enforcement and judges are black, muslim and La-Raza type Latinos.


6 posted on 04/01/2015 7:00:44 AM PDT by Iron Munro (It IS as BAD as you think and they ARE out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Overheard two men in my neighborhood yesterday discussing killing people in a state of war. The discussion came down to what constitutes a war? The one man claimed that an individual can act on an enemy if they feel they are unjustly treated by an unjust system or it's represented peoples. The other man claimed that was not so. In the end they agreed that war is a condition which can be self determined as needed though.

Thank goodness for fences.

7 posted on 04/01/2015 7:00:59 AM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc

“This is a war against the founding of this country and Christians which the homosexuals have always hated.”

...I agree with the “war” part. Gays and straights lived together quite well until this became agenda driven. My wife and I had gay friends before we had kids and never had issues. They respected our beliefs and accepted us as friends.


8 posted on 04/01/2015 7:01:45 AM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Of course not. These PERPS were BLACK. Now, had these PERPS been white beating up a BLACK person, there would have been HELL TO PAY. They would have gotten at the very minimum 20 years. You see, in this country, there are two sets of laws. One for BLACK perps and one for WHITE perps. Especially when dealing with attacks on one race against another.


9 posted on 04/01/2015 7:02:10 AM PDT by gingerbread
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Black on white, meh. Not worth mentioning.

White on black, riots, looting, presidential interfering, MSM - daily coverage 24/7

10 posted on 04/01/2015 7:05:02 AM PDT by SkyDancer (I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
[Satire] Meanwhile somewhere in America, a black male beat a white male severely.

During the beating, the black male continually screamed, "I hate you because you are white. I am beating you because you are white. I hate all whites."

Police refused to charge the black man with a hate crime because they said there was no evidence of racial motive.

The police chief dismissed the dozens of eyewitnesses and ten videos of the beating as "unconvincing".

11 posted on 04/01/2015 7:05:12 AM PDT by Dr. Thorne (The night is far spent, the day is at hand.- Romans 13:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Black hating against whitey? Everybody knows dats impossible.


12 posted on 04/01/2015 7:06:35 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not, no explanation is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Not too much of a double standard we’re living under, is there?


13 posted on 04/01/2015 7:09:21 AM PDT by Canedawg (Panem et circenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Hate crime laws should be abolished.
Since they can't be applied objectively (and prosecutors don't even try) then why bother?
Assault is assault. The verifiable act should be enough for conviction.

14 posted on 04/01/2015 7:10:34 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc
we are going into anarchy right now

It won't take much for things to get out of control in large densely populated public situations.

15 posted on 04/01/2015 7:15:16 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1
I agree, assault is assault. Hate crime laws are, by nature, divisive and capriciously applied.
16 posted on 04/01/2015 7:15:30 AM PDT by blaveda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

However, had the victim done as I would have done, and pulled his gun and shot the perps for attacking him; that would have been construed as a hate crime.


17 posted on 04/01/2015 7:16:19 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte (Psalm 14:1 ~ The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Whites and Christians in America can now be legally victimized, beaten and discriminated against. All of that change in just 6.4 years of obozo being in the WH.


18 posted on 04/01/2015 7:18:30 AM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grania

When this starts, it’ll be open season with no bag limit.


19 posted on 04/01/2015 7:19:45 AM PDT by Noumenon (Resistance. Restoration. Retribution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Is anyone surprised? Hate crime laws were created to ‘extra punish’ the oppressor (whitey) whenever possible. I believe I head Josh ‘Earnest’ say ‘the religious freedom laws were created to protect religious minorities from persecution’ (paraphrase). That was the rationalization for the bullying of Indiana and Gov Pence. So, now we find out that all the bullying of Christians is OK because Christianity is a majority religion. Minorities have the control and the country/world is much the worse off for it.


20 posted on 04/01/2015 7:21:03 AM PDT by originalbuckeye (Moderation in temper is always a virtue; moderation in principle is always a vice. Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson