Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The 2016 Republican Presidential Nomination (Convention Rules)
LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE ^ | April 2, 2014 | Morton Blackwell

Posted on 04/03/2015 6:42:32 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
Well said. I traveled to Maine for the caucuses in February 2012. After a long process, with many irregularities, delegates were elected to the convention. Those delegates were not seated at the Convention, vetoed by Romney, Inc. ...

Candidates should be asked to pledge to support this rule change: "Any requirements for prior proof of support for a presidential candidate should affect only the determination of which candidates may be presented to the convention by formal nominating speeches."

1 posted on 04/03/2015 6:42:32 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Impy; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; yongin; Clintonfatigued; PhilCollins; Salvation; ..

2016 ping


2 posted on 04/03/2015 6:45:11 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (-Connecticut Republicanism is a mental disorder. - Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT

Yep, Malkin covered this live as it happened. Boehner and Team Romney rigged the convention so that the GOP-E could select the nominee in 2016.


3 posted on 04/03/2015 6:49:56 PM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT

And we expected something different from the uniparty? Our elections have only slightly less certainty than an election held in stalin era russia.


4 posted on 04/03/2015 6:52:35 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Ted Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT
Define all his supporters then as Reaganites and all other Republicans as non-Reaganites.

This time it will be Cruzers, and all other Republicans as non-Cruzers

5 posted on 04/03/2015 6:54:09 PM PDT by capydick ("If we lose freedom here, there is no place to escape to. This is the last stand on Earth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT

well, does anybody remember the last Whig candidate as opposed to the first Republican? Because I kind of see history repeating itself here


6 posted on 04/03/2015 6:56:40 PM PDT by Cowman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Cruz & Co. are smart enough to navigate around this.

Remember, Ted plans on bringing a bunch of new Patriots with him when he wins, RINOs already know they’re being primaried.


7 posted on 04/03/2015 6:57:19 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT

Mr. RomneyCARE and Obama are both partners of Soros.

QED


8 posted on 04/03/2015 6:59:21 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

We conservatives need to unite behind either Cruz or Walker. What we can’t have is a long fight between Cruz and Walker, where Bush cleans up (even possibly with just a plurality).


9 posted on 04/03/2015 7:00:03 PM PDT by TheConservator ("I spent my life trying not to be careless. Women and children can be careless, but not men.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT
Concern trolls gotta be concerned.

If they want to follow stupid rules to make sure a conservative isn't the nominee, then conservatives won't vote for the establishment candidate. It's that simple. Ignore the base and lose.

I don't see conservatives getting steam rolled again like they have before. Too much anger this time.

I sure won't vote for a liberal. Especially a liberal Republican.

Liberal Republicans must be politically destroyed. I'm donating time, effort, and money to make that happen.

/johnny

10 posted on 04/03/2015 7:09:12 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

I’ve been trying to tell people that Jebster’s nomination has been in the bag since 2012 when they changed the rules and adjusted the primary calendar.
The Cheap Labor Express has paid the RNC for an amnesty candidate.
The RNC means to deliver.
I’m hoping we can pull off a miracle and nominate Ted Cruz like we pulled off here in VA-7 in booting the weasel Eric Cantor. David vs Goliath.


11 posted on 04/03/2015 7:10:02 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
You know that you have prayers and support in making sure that Cruz pulls this off. Lots of us won't vote for anyone else.

/johnny

12 posted on 04/03/2015 7:21:31 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT
I think a lot has changed in the year since this was written. The conservative base is waking up like an angry bear in springtime. Cruz is playing very strategically by rolling up support early from a huge constituency that could get him numerical support and a huge amount of money—Evangelicals. He has a clear advantage over all the other candidates in this.

Where necessary, conservatives and delegates should ignore the stupid rules, show up at the convention with a plan, and make trouble. They could turn a prissy, control-freak convention upside-down in no time.

13 posted on 04/03/2015 7:23:48 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator

Absolutely correct. Conservatives must coalesce around one candidate very early. We must deny the enemy the high ground.

Candidates, if you are not getting traction, bow out of the race! The nation and perhaps the free world is at stake. Check your egos at the door.


14 posted on 04/03/2015 7:24:03 PM PDT by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator

We conservatives need to unite behind either Cruz or Walker. What we can’t have is a long fight between Cruz and Walker, where Bush cleans up (even possibly with just a plurality).


You’re absolutely correct. Many here should take heed to that.


15 posted on 04/03/2015 7:25:52 PM PDT by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT

>>The establishment candidate will almost certainly be Jeb Bush or Chris Christie. <<

And once more, the establishment will lose; maybe by such a margin as to destroy them.


16 posted on 04/03/2015 7:46:33 PM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator

Playing nice by the uniparty’s rules and “respecting the results” is for fools and suckers. The negotiation position of conservatives should be very simple: our conservative or the gop faction’s demise.

As for unity, I’m already united behind Cruz. Walker is a fine fellow I’m sure but the only people he seems to inspire are journalists and accountants. He’s also likely the uniparty fall back position.


17 posted on 04/03/2015 7:47:07 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Ted Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

“As for unity, I’m already united behind Cruz.”
I also like Walker but the fire in the belly that I hear from Cruz really gets me going. I have already volunteered and sent the man my first installment on the funds he’ll need and hope to be able to send more this month.
Lets all get behind Ted and make this happen this time out.

Stay out of the Bushes!!!!!!!!!!!!!


18 posted on 04/03/2015 8:04:29 PM PDT by devildognc (Semper Fi To Cruz in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: devildognc

Cruz or lose.


19 posted on 04/03/2015 8:08:02 PM PDT by gwgn02
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT

Romney was awarded states and delegates he did not win, when the resulting complaints came in they responded by changing the rules and thumbing their noses at us.
Basically stating “WE know who your candidate should be better than YOU!”
It worked so well, as all can see.


20 posted on 04/03/2015 8:08:53 PM PDT by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson