[Norm Lenhart]

How do libs worship the hirstute man anus? Let me count the ways....

[2ndDivisionVet]

The Fix is in.

[rockrr]

So who is gonna render the Dred Scott decision of the 21st century?

[Jim from C-Town]

Kennedy has been a stain on the body politic for decades. He is responsible for this entire fiasco with his insipid and retarded Lawrence VS. Texas decision. ‘

He should burn in Hell!

[GeronL]

Do these people really think they should ever be taken seriously writing this kind of bilge

[clearcarbon]

"But just how does this hurt regular marriage? As Ginsburg puts it: 'How could that be? Because all of the incentives, all of the benefits that marriage affords would still be available. So you’re not taking away anything from heterosexual couples.'”

You have a small set of humans. Two are male, and two are female. The two males marry and the two females marry.

"...does this hurt regular marriage?

Does it benefit society?

[HiTech RedNeck]

I suppose one empty shell is as noble as any other empty shell. Marriage as once honored by all good men was at least an expectant place holder for what we know as holy matrimony.

It’s sad but true that Christians themselves may have had a hand in its demise, but not keeping it holy. In a way this is God saying okay you treated this as profane, I’ll let the devil show you profane. Then you’ll have to fight, but eventually if you let Me back into your hearts you will once more win. Then I hope you never forget the lesson.

[HiTech RedNeck]

but not keeping it holy => by not keeping it holy

[RginTN]

why not shack up, marriage is just a piece of paper/Libs

[Amendment10]

If the 17th Amendment had not been ratified then there would probably be all different faces on the Supreme Court today. And if such was the case then patriots would probably not be concerned about activist justices like Roberts and Kennedy who evidently let their emotions trump what the Constitution indicates about gay marriage.

And what the Constitution indicates about gay marriage is this. Not only have the states never delegated to the Supreme Court, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to define marriage, but Justice Kennedy and all the other justices should be explaining the following about gay marriage in one unified voice.

The Founding States had made the 10th Amendment to clarify that the Constitution’s silence about things like marriage means that the states, not the feds, uniquely have the constitutional authority to make laws which prohibit constitutionally unprotected gay marriage.

The 17th Amendment needs to disappear, and activist justices along with it.

[The Ghost of FReepers Past]

I am not sure what the person really said but this quote is different than what I saw elsewhere.

[dennisw]

What’s so noble about two warped doods cornholing each other? Stupid and filthy, yes. Noble, no.

[NetAddicted]

Marriage offers dignity? Well, then can singles sue for dignity? I thought the dignity came from being married to the other parent of your kids.

[Slyfox]

“We are now standing in the face of the greatest historical confrontation humanity has gone through. I do not think that wide circles of the American society or wide circles of the Christian community realize this fully. We are now facing the final confrontation between the Church and the anti-Church, of the Gospel versus the anti-Gospel.”

~ Karol Cardinal Wojtyla, who became St. John Paul the Great {Karol Cardinal Wojtyla, “Notable & Quotable,” “Wall Street Journal” (Nov. 9, 1978), 30.}

[Ronin]

The protestors have probably done more damage to their cause than good. I’d like to be hopeful, but Roberts has proven he is a scumbag and with Kennedy leaning left, it looks like the queers have this one in the bag.

[Gene Eric]

Slate publicly stroking Kennedy...

[Joe Boucher]

these justices aren’t worth a bucket of spit.

[Travis McGee]