That's just another way to say "Cruz is as bad as my candidate (on immigration)".
Walker was never mentioned in the article or your first comment about it. Why then, finally come upon "Cruz is the same (or bad as) Walker on immigration?". I see it as a subtle attack on Cruz because he is a real threat to liberals and a lot of candidates who are considered conservative.
I don't want to bash Walker because if he does rise and win over Cruz I'll accept it and vote for him. That doesn't mean I'll sit here and let subtle threads designed to highlight Cruz in a bad way happen either.
I DON'T post original threads for either candidate. I endorse Cruz wherever I can and try to keep from commenting about Walker in a bad way except when it gets out of the realm of normal discourse and information, particularly when such discussion is designed to 'illustrate' the foibles of Cruz when ignoring one's own candidate.
I guess that I posted remarks by Rubio and Bush (as well as the Cruz and Walker) on this same thread just didn't enter into your calculations when you'd decided that I was bashing Cruz.
AGAIN I will say we must be honest that this is a hot-button issue for all the candidates. That there are no "pure" candidates.
I've said my peace on this. You're just playing wack-a-mole now.