Posted on 05/04/2015 1:00:09 PM PDT by gwgn02
You might have been better off eliminating that first pic... :-)
By The Donald's logic, that would mean we should all convert to Islam immediately.
Pam Geller is right-—Give an inch into Sharia Law and they will incrementally take over. What’s next? Women not driving? No art because it represents the human body? Women covering their heads? Honor killings? BTW, why don’t they get upset at the Sharia attitude to homosexuality? Slaughtering of Christians is obviously no big deal! Good for Pam—She knows a “savage” when she sees one!
A righteous, strong, brave AND good looking American woman!
So very different than our typical milquetoast American women.
Where are the 1,000 good men standing behind her to fight?
Donald?
Great post and great points.
But with the honor killings...my fiancé watching dancing with the stars, American idol, housewives of..., and the Voice, I might meet them half way.
I know. I was trying to be provocative. The Donald isn’t even worth polishing ex-United States Representative Eric Cantor’s boots for his short sighted comments. Eric Cantor was not our friend for taking a stand for conservative values. I don’t have time to list them.
However, I believe Pamela Geller is seen with Cantor because he was the sole Jewish Republican in the House of Representatives during his 7 terms in office.
Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) Executive Director Matt Brooks had to say shortly after Cantor’s resounding defeat:
“We are disappointed that our friend Eric Cantor lost his primary race tonight, but we are proud of his many, many accomplishments in Congress…Eric has been an important pro-Israel voice in the House and a leader on security issues, including Iran sanctions. We deeply appreciate his efforts to keep our country secure and to support our allies around the world.”
I shut F&F off this morning when he said that. To say he’s an idiot would be an insult to idiots.
Okay...so we need an /s to indicate sarcasm for the slower among us; now we need a /p so people like me know a statement is provocative if I can’t figure it out on my own...like this instance. All these new fangaled acronyms and text abbreviations and such drive me nuts. :-)
Mr. Trump, please do not run. And your Trump Tower is bug ugly.
But I must say, the exchange you had with Obama over the birth certificate was brilliant.
Thomas Paine was just taunting the British. Go Pamela Geller!!
His opinion is basically the same as Glen Beck’s.
Pray America is waking
Donald, are you suggesting that it’s ok for patriotic Americans to shoot flag burners if they feel taunted by them?
Donald, why is somehow ok for you to taunt liberals and the media but not ok for Americans to taunt muslim terrorists?
Pamela Geller is a woman I have never known before Sunday. Now I think she is another Sarah Palin who is just as hated by the Left. The Left tries to describe Geller as a neo-nazi publisher, bigot, and idiot. The Left describes her in terms that we should describe the Leftist Media and their minions. They are totalitarians who use their freedom of speech to indoctrinate their fellow citizens to what they want them to believe and limit the freedom of speech that says otherwise.
Sounds to me like Pamela Geller has found a sure fire way of flushing out SJS* practioners.
You could schedule a Mohammed cartoon contest at some abandoned warehouse, set up a perimeter, and wait for the crazies to show up. Hilarity would ensue.
* Sudden Jihad Syndrome
Donald,
So it’s ok to burn the flag to test Free Speech, but you can’t draw pictures of a false prophet for the same reason?
Don’t worry. The /s statement evolved from the HTML end tag, “</sarcasm>.” It has been simplified to “/s.” HTML can do some neat things when you post on line. I just know the bare essentials. What bothers me are the acronyms like AFAICT (as far as I can tell). I think they work to confuse NSA Big Brother.
I didn’t choose to use Cantor’s photo as sarcasm. He was a strong advocate for Israel while he was a U.S. Representative. We need more like him in Congress (both houses). However, Cantor failed by going the route of the pro-amnesty Republican establishment.
Mohammedans don’t need to be “taunted” to do what they do.
Donald is wrong on this one. He does a lot of business in the Mideast so he does not want to get involved. He should have just said he would not do it but the 1st amendment gives the right of free speech.
yes.
next question RINO?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.