The correct response to a non-argument is a reply in the same vein:
Posted on 05/06/2015 1:43:34 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Demonization can lead to violence, he says, and completely misses the irony.
Some are calling for violence against Geller but repeatedly calling her a hater and a racist has nothing whatever to do with that, right?
So much for gutting NASA for a mudSlime outreach program.
Why hasn't CONgrease impeached him yet? Oh yeah, because they all worship satan/allah too!
To buy into this crap sandwich, you have to believe that Free Speech is wrong, and retaliation is right.
There is a festering problem in this nation. The FBI acknowledges that there is so much Islamist chatter about violence, they ignore it.
That speech is therefore sanctioned.
Of course the type Geller is being accredited with, is evil, and shouldn’t be sanctioned. This states Time Magazine.
The correct response to a non-argument is a reply in the same vein:
And beheading people is free speech Qasim?
let’s see: Martin Luther King was assassinated. And who today is being assassinated? The assassins are coming out of the cult of hate today as during the time of King. The people being assassinated are the victims. Also, just as then, the haters were a subgroups in a larger group that was largely cowed by the terrorists in the cult of hate. Of course, this hater thinks all Southern whites were part of the KKK. This is because he is a Muslim supremacist and a hater of Americans. His counterpart today would say all Muslims are part of radical Islamic extremism. Here is what we can say about our history: we didn’t need a foreign army to come here to try to democratize us. We, on our own, through leaders such as King, with presidents such as Dwight Eisenhower, Jack Kennedy and LBJ, with the National Guard and the FBI, we broke the back of the KKK ourselves.
Absolutely correct! We may not be at war with Islam, but muzzies are at war with us.
The choice is plain: the Constitution or Shariah.
And to Qasim I would say, eat it muzzie! This isn’t your precious Pakistan. Christians aren’t a persecuted minority here. We are the majority and we have guns and are not afraid to use them for defense.
Your two dead jihadi brethren can attest to that (in hell, that is).
There was outrage at the Piss Christ. It’s just that nobody killed anyone over it. The Piss Christ was also taxpayer funded so we all owned it. Pam’s event was purely private.
Qasim can go suck a bag of d!**s.
Oh, and if you don’t like what I have to say doosh, you and your boys come to Cripple Creek.
We’ll adjust your muzzie attitude.
Geller is number 1 around here.
It must suck to have his coreligionists once again PROVE how violent his religion is.
“What Pamela Geller Advocates Is Not Free Speech”
Of course it is, and this “Time” article is simply a Muslim propaganda anti-free-speech hit piece.
The originalist meaning was to set apart as having pre-eminence of authority. There was to be no American equivalent to the Church Of England. The NASA thing is an unfathomably silly PR move (maybe to show that oh, an 8th century society can do rocket science after all?) and isn’t the same.
Simple.
In a public forum, ask Qasim...repeatedly and incessantly: “Was the Prophet a pedophile for taking a 9-year old child as a wife?”
Ask this, out loud, time and time again.
Free speech, baby.
What about that movie about the NK leader? Everyone thought that was free speech. Or all sorts of vile productions and artwork slamming Christ and christians.
So what is it then?
This ratfink does not believe in liberty.
The old conviction of conscience was that it was always possible to argue cogently against erroneous statements. So such were tolerated.
Mired in disoriented relativism, we are robbed of that conviction.
Only a raghead idiot could manage to become a lawyer without even an elementary knowledge of the Constitution.
Shows just how far this mighty nation has fallen.
When they commit heinous acts, it's always someone else's fault.
what is the REST of that wording in A1, please? Betwwen the religion part and what follows.?
“and the free exercise thereof” ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.