Posted on 05/08/2015 4:02:44 AM PDT by Zakeet
The day that Hillary conceded the 2008 primaries, I rode the train back from Washington to New York with another political journalist. We wondered, then, about the possibility that Clinton might someday run for president again. At that moment, with tempers in the Democratic Party still blazing, it seemed awfully remote. But, we agreed, we could both picture it. There was just one big piece of baggage shed need to lose first: Bill.
(Excerpt) Read more at newrepublic.com ...
The world's smartest woman ditch her Bubba ... seems impossible cause they're such a perfect matched pair!
But, but I thought that she would have done that ages ago. After all, she told DNCBS on “60 Minutes” in 1992 that she was not some “Stand by your Man” type like Tammy Wynette.
I hate to tell Hillary, but most people inclined to vote for her want Bill back and see her election as the best way to do it.
Remember? Two for the vote for one? Co-president?
Yup, that’s what people are thinking.
They just aren’t into you, Hill, it’s Bill.
I didn’t read the whole article (can’t stand New Republic). But the idea for Hillary to ‘ditch Bill’ is laughable. What is she going to run on?
Her accomplishment? (what? where?)
Her experience? (again, on what?)
Her age? Her white woman, grandmotherhood? (Palin as a grandmother was way ahead of her)
What else can Hillary sell herself? (her files on almost who’s who?)
Alcoholics Anonymous.
What? Split from the Foundation? No way!
“Hillary Rodham for President”?
Why not. If a bigot with no ability can win twice in a row, a witch with no charm can surely replace him.
Best thing for her is for him to pass away. She’d get good attendance at the funeral-rally, all the pomp and ceremony on taxpayer dime, down the streets of DC, and Hill the star attraction. I can see her riding that like a fifth horseman.
There are actually a few good insights in this article, even if it does come from the New Republic. The author is bringing up a lot of reservations that are echoed on liberal websites. They’re not thrilled about all the baggage Shrillary carries. They wish they had someone who was much, much cleaner and didn’t require pretzel twisting to explain away or rationalize all her unethical behavior and lack of transparency. The best they seem to muster is “everybody does it and Republicans are far worse”.
She’s ridden his coat tails their who,r relationship. If it wasn’t for Bill, the world would have never heard of Canckles. They both know this.
She's been planning it, but it's tough to get the poison past the secret service guys.
I saw his interview last week about the money he’s making from speeches. She doesn’t need to dump him...looks to me like she’s gonna be having his funeral before too long.
What...how heartless could you be, not voting for the ‘Widder’ Clinton?
The evil is a tonic to these bastards. Look at Jim Wright, Jimmy Carter and any other number of Democrat shiite heads.
Talk about a Freudian slip.
I believe their minds work that way. In order to be a RAT in high public office one must have the soul and morals of a pirate. It doesn’t work if everyone sees it.
A horse with Reagan's boots in the stirrups backwards was part of his funeral procession. Which of Clinton's rides will serve the same purpose?
Well, he looks like death warmed over lately...
Kinda like Ron Brown?
The widow Clinton would follow the tried and proven DNC tactic of jamming the widows of dim pols down the throats of weepy low/no info voters.
Hey, it’s worked before.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.