Why? Other than talking a good game and helping to run HP into the ground what makes Fiorina a good candidate for the second spot?
Why do people find it necessary to make personal attacks. Her HP leadership was questionable, but what company was doing well against MS during those years?
I will give you the answer. First this HP thing means nothing to but a few voters. Nobody's going to care much about her allegedly running HP into the ground. She worked there five years for goodness sake. Most jobs last around that long so it's not like she killed the company within a year. AND...HP is still very much around so....I don't think it's going to matter all that much.
Beyond that....you ask what makes her a good candidate for the second spot......SHE'S A WOMAN!
Because if the Republicans have not learned a thing they should know to get some sort of decent representative of a so-called "minority" out there representing the Republican party. Cause few people don't like Obama because of his race, come on. And plenty of Republicans will vote for Ben Carson.
Firorini is way above Hillary and so far she seems to be the only female out there seeking the job. She talks a good game and what else do we have to judge these people by but their verbiage.
On talent and experience alone, the VP slot maybe belongs to a Huckabee....or a Santorum. But Fiorina, she's a female. Bout time the Republicans get some females out there else the world will think Hillary is some sort of typical American female.
It doesn't matter if she gets it or not. The fact that she's out there "talking a good game" is all that does. Hopefully she won't get destroyed by the RATagandists...they certainly will try.