[tanknetter]

Not really a lot for him to explain.

Rove is right: the only way to get rid of guns is to get rid of the Second Amendment.

Which requires 2/3rds of the Congress and 3/4ths of the states.

We should welcome any attempt by the Libs to go this route. First because it is the proper Constitutional route to follow and second because it will have predictable results.

Ever read B’rer Rabbit and the Briar Patch?

[Durus]

Actually Rove is incorrect. There is no evidence that repeal of the 2nd amendment would in anyway reduce the criminal use of firearms which was his premise. The countries with the highest rate of homicide with the use of a firearm have strict gun control laws.

Although I welcome the gun controllers to come out of the closet and dare to try to repeal the 2nd Amendment, it should be noted that there stated reasons are demonstrably false.

[Eddie01]

“Rove is right: the only way to get rid of guns is to get rid of the Second Amendment.”

That statement is false.

[drpix]

"Not really a lot for him to explain. Rove is right: the only way to get rid of guns is to get rid of the Second Amendment."

You and Rove are dead wrong!

What Rove says is doing away with the 2nd Amendment will "remove guns from society" and thereby "dramatically reduce acts of violence involving guns" - when clearly the lack of Constitutional Gun Rights in Mexico or so many other 3rd world blood-drenched hellholes has clearly neither remove guns from their societies nor reduced gun violence.

You are wrong because you say doing away with the 2nd Amendment will do away with guns (see above) AND because you give Rove a pass on his false lefwing formulation of the issue as Gun Rights vs Criminal Gun Violence.