FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
Posted on 06/25/2015 3:41:45 AM PDT by Perdogg
US Supreme Court Issues and Opinions - 9:30am EDT (SCOTUS Blog to start at 9am) 6-25-15
Exactly.
Mike Brown, Trayvon Martin, Rachel Jeantel and Freddie Gray coming soon to your neighborhood, and there ain’t a damn thing you can do about, whitey...because the barrier you used to have, namely price, is gone. The Government will just give them the money.
Remember, these people aren’t in the improvement business. They are in the equality business. Even if we’re all living in a pig stye, thats OK, so long as we’re all equal.
Detroit needs a new motto my friends. “City of Tomorrow” seems about right.
So once again we have that sorry ass George W. Bush to thank for another LIBERAL being appointed to the court. Roberts, the asshole has turned into the biggest Obama cheerleader on the court.
Tomorrow it will be the exact same two republican-appointed judges that will give the country fag marriage. 6-3 vote again. Mark it down. The closeted Roberts and the always reliable liberal voter Kennedy.
NOW YOU CAN DITCH THAT BEARD YOU BITCH
The NSA must have pictures of Roberts in bed with sheep!
Nope. The elites on both sides of the aisle want socialized medicine. Roberts is happily carrying their water.
Even then, apparently the pine 2x4 is not enough... it requires a 6x20 steel girder.
What if his core belief is not rocking the boat?
“We knew Roberts to be a solid judicial conservative”.
WHAT? We knew that Roberts worked pro-bono for homosexual activists in a Supreme Court case. That alone should have told anyone this man was not a conservative.
This is a huge victory for the GOPe, which can now fundraise and campaign on “stopping Obamacare” in the House and Senate while not doing one damn thing to repeal it. And it’s a huge victory for Bush and other GOPe candidates who really want this thing in place.
There are all sorts of conspiracy theories involving Robert's children and how they were adopted that could be pertinent here and about Robert's decisions in general. We are likely to never know for sure, but Roberts may be an owned man.
“In this instance, the context and structure of the Act compel us to depart from what would otherwise be the most natural reading of the pertinent statutory phrase.” - Justice Roberts explaining that he felt compelled to ignore the literal meaning of the healthcare law.
Honestly, there really are no words.
FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
Ann Barnhardt is right. America as we know it is dead.
You are asking me to prove a negative. Please send a url or evidence that the Supreme Court and its employees are exempt.
Congress can now pass laws that don’t say what they really say, and taxes that aren’t really a tax.
The mischief will be endless.
Actually, Marbury v. Madison would be the correct application, except Roberts acted as though the Dem Congress was legislating in good faith. A “fair and reasonable” understanding of the context of the law was that the Dem Congress was deceitful and devious in passing the legislation.
"We're not gonna stand for obolacare!!!" - (crickets)
"We're not gonna stand for TPP / TPA!!!!" - (crickets)
"We're not gonna stand gay marriage!!!" - (crickets)
America is doomed, because her protectors - the people - refuse to stand.
“This what we have to do to save the ACA!”
The sum of the opinion...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.