Skip to comments.
Sheriff Clarke just used this R word to forecast the fallout from Supreme Court Ruling
Western Journalism ^
| 6-29-15
| Norvell Rose
Posted on 06/29/2015 9:43:44 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
To: livius
And he has the face of a leader. He sure does!
41
posted on
06/29/2015 10:40:41 AM PDT
by
DungeonMaster
(Of those born of women there is not risen one greater than John The Baptist.)
To: afraidfortherepublic
I’m pretty sure CONgress has the power to impeach a Supreme Court justice, just like they can impeach a lesser judge or a sitting President.
But they won’t.
42
posted on
06/29/2015 10:42:00 AM PDT
by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Cancer-free since 1988! US out of UN! UN out of US!)
To: pgkdan
The more I see of Sheriff Clarke the more I like! I TOTALLY AGREE with you.
When he speaks I DO NOT see COLOR.
I SEE and HEAR someone speaking like a TRUE AMERICAN.
To: afraidfortherepublic
And, what are we supposed to say? I dont think the congress has the power to remove a Justice of the SC. They do. It's called impeachment. Abrogating their oaths of office certainly meets the standard of High Crime and misdemeanor to remove them from their position.
44
posted on
06/29/2015 10:47:48 AM PDT
by
Swordmaker
( This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
To: exit82
45
posted on
06/29/2015 10:51:06 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Conservatism: Now home to liars too. And we'll support them. Yea... GOPe)
To: afraidfortherepublic
46
posted on
06/29/2015 10:53:18 AM PDT
by
10mm
To: afraidfortherepublic
I agree with the sheriff, the seeds of a new American Revolution have been sown
47
posted on
06/29/2015 11:01:18 AM PDT
by
The Great RJ
(“Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money.” Margaret Thatcher)
To: NorthMountain
Impeach them and replace them with who? More of zero’s choice, liberal appointees? Guess we’ll have to ride out this storm - for now anyway.
48
posted on
06/29/2015 11:05:03 AM PDT
by
Catsrus
To: afraidfortherepublic
The way to attack this is to run to the courthouse and file for a polygamous/incestuous marriage using the SAME original filing in Obergefell v. Hodge, substituting for “homosexual” or “gay” as appropriate.
Now that marriage means nothing, lets make it clear it means nothing.
49
posted on
06/29/2015 11:12:44 AM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(When things are rightly ordered, man is steward of God's gifts and civIns law enables him to do so.)
To: NorthMountain
Kennedy, Sotomayor, Kagan, Ginsberg, and Breyer definitely deserve impeachment Don't you think that it would set a very dangerous precedent to impeach judges because you didn't like their decisions???
50
posted on
06/29/2015 11:19:16 AM PDT
by
terycarl
(, COMMON SENSE PREVAILS OVERALL)
To: afraidfortherepublic
He’s the very best, bar none!
51
posted on
06/29/2015 11:26:57 AM PDT
by
onyx
(PLEASE SUPPORT FR. Donate Monthly or Join Club 300! God bless)
To: afraidfortherepublic; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ..
Thanks afraidfortherepublic.
52
posted on
06/29/2015 11:29:59 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW)
To: afraidfortherepublic
I love this guy, in a platonic, brotherly fashion of course.
53
posted on
06/29/2015 11:39:14 AM PDT
by
semaj
(Audentes fortuna juvat: Fortune favors the bold. Be Bold FRiends.)
To: afraidfortherepublic
54
posted on
06/29/2015 11:46:29 AM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: terycarl
“Don’t you think that it would set a very dangerous precedent to impeach judges because you didn’t like their decisions?”
That is not the case here. It is imperative to remove judges who act criminally, illegally, unconstitutionally, and unethically. It is not a matter of what people “like”.
55
posted on
06/29/2015 11:51:41 AM PDT
by
unlearner
(RIP America, 7/4/1776 - 6/26/2015, "Only God can judge us now." - Claus Von Stauffenberg / Valkyrie)
To: afraidfortherepublic
Wait a minute!
Isn’t it RACIST! to use any other word as the ‘R’ than RACIST!
Oh wait... is it RACIST! To even mention the word RACIST! unless one is of the correct RACE?
56
posted on
06/29/2015 11:52:11 AM PDT
by
Voice of Reason1
(Absolute power corrupts absolutely Lord Acton 1887)
To: WayneS
57
posted on
06/29/2015 11:55:41 AM PDT
by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
To: exit82
Article 3, Section 2 of the Constitution: Congress can regulate anything the Supreme Court does.
Congress can overturn a Supreme Court ruling.
Why?
Because only Congress can make law.
The Supreme Court did not have any legal basis for their ruling on Friday.
The members of Congress have taken an oath to defend and protect the Constitution.
We dont need a Constitutional Amendment, Congress can pass legislation invalidating the Supreme Court decision and remanding the issue back to the states.
It is that simple.
If true, it is the best news I have heard in over 6 years.
To: cableguymn
Maybe he’ll do a Vince Foster and decide to take a trip to a park and shoot himself after he’s been dead a few hours.
That was a great trick old Vince pulled. Still has people fooled how he did it.
59
posted on
06/29/2015 12:23:27 PM PDT
by
IMR 4350
To: afraidfortherepublic
The new Three Rs under Homobama:
ROT, RAGE and REVOLT.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson