Skip to comments.
Is Polygamy the Next Form of "Marriage" to be Legalized?
The New American ^
| July 23, 2015
| Joe Wolverton, II, J.D.
Posted on 07/24/2015 3:49:40 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Is Polygamy the Next Form of "Marriage" to be Legalized? Yes. Next question.
2
posted on
07/24/2015 3:51:13 PM PDT
by
bkopto
(Free men are not equal. Equal men are not free.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Of course
I got a question to men Freepers if you have a choice of three wives would you welcome your respectable mother in laws in the house
I doubt it
3
posted on
07/24/2015 3:53:39 PM PDT
by
SevenofNine
(We are Freepers, all your media bases belong to us ,resistance is futile)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
It’s already legal.
According The Supremes “Who decides a loving relationship but, the partied engaged?”
Or something like that
4
posted on
07/24/2015 3:55:36 PM PDT
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Once justification for two men or two women to be married takes place [as it already has], what possibly could be any more damaging [to family; America in general] than that? I look for polygamy to be up next.
5
posted on
07/24/2015 3:56:25 PM PDT
by
mlizzy
("Tell your troubles to Jesus," my wisecracking father used to say, and now I do.......at adoration.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I don’t see how the media would profit from it so I don’t think so.
Homosexuals are a hot marketing demographic. The media HAD to push their agenda.
6
posted on
07/24/2015 3:56:30 PM PDT
by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
To: SevenofNine
7
posted on
07/24/2015 3:56:36 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
To: mrsmith
1% of the population is hot demographically?
8
posted on
07/24/2015 3:57:16 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Probably.
But when people like Nancy Pelosi suggest lowering the voting age to 16 years old — you can bet that the push to lower the age of sexual consent isn’t far behind.
9
posted on
07/24/2015 3:59:35 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
They’re very desirable to the marketers: high disposable incomes and low self-esteem.
And ALL of the networks’ income comes from ad marketers.
10
posted on
07/24/2015 4:02:44 PM PDT
by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Just because something is “legal” it doesnt mean every place has to do it.
Burgers and pizza are legal, but no one can sue a pizza place for refusing to make them a burger.
We only do biblical marriages. We do not do pop/fad/contemporary secular marriages. Sorry. Not on our menu.
11
posted on
07/24/2015 4:03:37 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I suppose anymore I don’t understand why anyone would fight heterosexual polygamous marriage when a homosexual poly-whatever marriage is essentially a legal inevitability.
The USSC ruled that two queers can marry. Three of them marrying is really of no greater harm than two of them marrying so from a legal standpoint it is inevitable.
12
posted on
07/24/2015 4:08:40 PM PDT
by
MeganC
(The Republic of The United States of America: 7/4/1776 to 6/26/2015 R.I.P.)
To: Secret Agent Man
“Burgers and pizza are legal, but no one can sue a pizza place for refusing to make them a burger.”
Why not? Anyone can sue a pizza place to try to make them sell a hamburger. You may not win, but you sure can sue.
13
posted on
07/24/2015 4:10:27 PM PDT
by
MeganC
(The Republic of The United States of America: 7/4/1776 to 6/26/2015 R.I.P.)
To: MeganC
Have you heard the term frivolous lawsuit?
Judge would have both the plaintiff and lawyer who took the case fined for contempt of court and wasting the court’s time.
14
posted on
07/24/2015 4:14:37 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Polygamy, children, then non-humans. Love Unrestricted sex wins.
15
posted on
07/24/2015 4:20:15 PM PDT
by
DaveyB
(Live free or die!)
To: Secret Agent Man
And in the 1970’s when Anita Bryant was ridiculed for warning about the queers trying to take over the country a gay marriage lawsuit would have been tossed out as frivolous.
And here we are today dealing with the aftermath of just such a frivolous lawsuit.
16
posted on
07/24/2015 4:22:34 PM PDT
by
MeganC
(The Republic of The United States of America: 7/4/1776 to 6/26/2015 R.I.P.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Minor concern next to a couple of queers getting married.
17
posted on
07/24/2015 4:30:58 PM PDT
by
Neoliberalnot
(Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Allyhoo Akbear or something like that. :(
18
posted on
07/24/2015 4:38:29 PM PDT
by
ZULU
(Democrats are paleosocialists)
To: ZULU
Many of the men in the Bible were polygamists.
19
posted on
07/24/2015 4:39:25 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
So we’re the guys carrying a sword in one hand and a Koran in the other. It is not part of our culture.
20
posted on
07/24/2015 4:42:44 PM PDT
by
ZULU
(Democrats are paleosocialists)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson