England had their Richard the Lionhearted; America has their Hillary the Lyin’Hearted (dropping that “g” is respectful of Mrs. Clinton’s “I ain’t know ways tired” dialect).
“Will the Democrats actually nominate the dishonest, untrustworthy liar?”
Are their any other kind of democrats?
I would have thought that lesbian would make the list.
Compare Trump’s inclusion in this VERY BAD news for Hillary.
NOT ONE of any of the descriptor words for him were “LIAR, DISHONEST and UNTRUSTWORTHY”....Hillary’s top three.
It sucks to be the poor goober in charge of her campaign (I probably should say “whipping boy” because she’s the one orchestrating her fiasco - the 90s schtick not gonna work this time around girl).
I am going to guess, woman is a euphemism for the word I use.
The first word I associate with her is “murderer”.
I agree with you on Biden-Warren as the ticket. Little wonder Uncle Joe has fast tracked the startup of his presidential campaign. What I’m interested in is the Clintons reaction to all of this. No right wing conspiracy here. It’s the left doing the damage on them. Will they be dutiful party people and step aside or will they go out in a blaze of glory and take a bunch of Dems down with them. Hillary will not leave the presidential race willingly.
I love the Trump list!
I want that guy as President even more.
I wish they had Odumbass’s list
Note that in addition to liar, dishonest and untrustworthy (totaling 394), you also have crook, untruthful, criminal, deceitful, email (hardly a positive or even neutral word for her, given events), Benghazi, corrupt and crooked. Those latter descriptive words total another 125, for a total of 519 negative opinions of Cankles. 519 out of 838, or 61.9% negative...and not all of the rest are necessarily positive (more neutral, to be fair), like Bill, politician, Democrat - i.e. just facts. So her negatives probably outweigh her positives by 3:1 or more.
This is why I want her to be the Dem nominee - she has more negatives than anyone else in the race...and we’re at the tail end of 8 years of (unbelievably horrible) rule by her party.
I honestly believe it would be AT LEAST a 60% -40% blowout against her for Trump- and it could go as high as 70% for Trump.
They are using the same old polling methods- which are not working for Trump. Even Luntz said he never saw a candidate get 100% before in one of his surveys. I think people who have not voted in decades would go vote, and the pollsters do not count those people.
And Luntz does not even like Trump. But he has a business to run and he is very good at it. (when he is not injecting his personality into it). I think Luntz is one of the best pollsters I have ever seen. But he let it go to his head for a while there, and he himself is NOT Mr. Likeable
The only flaw in any “Hilary meltdown” is that it’s happening today, rather than 6 months from now. The media will have plenty of time to fabricate “comeback kid” scenarios for her.
My first three words do not appear on the list for Hillary. I also can’t post those words on FR.
They say “dishonest, untrustworthy, liar” about Hillary like that’s a bad thing. Democrat voters consider those strengths, which is why they support a crook like Hillary, after supporting their crooked predecessors - Obama and Bill.
Liar? No kidding! lol
See my tagline! =P
If I read this correctly, ythis is a poll from July 30th, but released today? What is that?