If she’s proud of every line in her face,
why does she use Botox?
Dialectical thinking?
Carly Fiorina: I don’t trust that face.
Hegel = Marx?
This is kind of silly.
Might have more luck with the classy “she’s ugly.”
Karl Marx loved hegelian dialectical thinking, too.
Sounds like a problem Trump needs to explore.
She probably liked that old TV show “Northern Exposure” too.
A debate question for iCarly.
Dialectical evolution —> Marxist dialectical materialism.
The 5 stages of Communism.
Carly Fiorina: Islamic Civilization was “Greatest in the World”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3322666/posts
Carly Fiorina Attacks Cruz: ‘No Honor’ In Fight To Defund Obamacare
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3322644/posts
Carly Fiorina is open to legal status for adult illegal immigrants, citizenship for their kids
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3322641/posts
To sum it up:
She loves eternally murderous deathcult known as Islam,
she loves Obamacare (aka Rationed, Collectivized Deathcare),
and she loves illegal aliens invading our country.
Now I know for sure she’s a Dem (aka GOP-E, RINO).
I am fascinated and printed out 4 or 5 source copies to study because ...
As a school board director of two years so far, I have been suspicious of the manner 2nd round interviews that had the final say of a teacher selected out of two or three candidates.
My suspicions arose about 9 or 10 months ago when what, imo, was a perfect candidate for a position, a lesser (obviously, again in my opinion) was chosen
I really didn't know how to define my thoughts until Delphi showed up
I'm convinced my local HS is selecting administrators and personnel and not teachers/educators
This article showing up now is weird
Things are getting crazy out there.
Huh?
Wow...bye, bye Carly...
This is an easy chance to defend Carley.
CARLY FIORINA, AUGUST 19, 2001: “Last year, I shared HP’s view of an emerging digital Renaissance. I talked about using the technology that is at our disposal to empower individual entrepreneurs, consumers and inventors. I shared a view of fueling, inspiring and connecting the everyday acts of many — and in the process, making the benefits of technology accessible to all.”
Carley Fiorina was exactly right in August 2001. She knew before 90% of Americans that personal computers would give power to citizen journalists (like Drudge) and kill movies, tv, magazines and books.
CARLY FIORINA, AUGUST 19, 2001: “The Hegelian dialectic is about one point of view pitted against its countervailing opposite. And from that contradiction and conflict arises a true synthesis that unifies these different views into a cohesive and often unexpected understanding.”
Carley is doing her best with using the philosophy of GWF Hegel (1770-1830) who wrote Phenomenology of Spirit in 1807. Synthesis does emerge from analysis and Hegel learned this scientific trick from Aristotle. In fact, Hegel was a humble student of Aristotle, just as was Galileo and St. Thomas Aquinas.
Thus, I defend Carley on her correctness in terms of the state of technology in 2001 and Hegel. Plus, she is 100% pro-life.
I blame Carley for taking photos with Don Warden. Warden is a criminal who worked with Bobby Seal in San Francisco.
I hope her pro-life courage influences all other Republican candidates.
Marx used Hagel, but not all Hagel is Marxist. That having been said, too much nerd can make communication difficult and hard to relate to an average person. That may well be applicable to Carly.
No surprise. The elites all use this to control the population... Under a different name: Problem, Reaction, Solution. 0’s posse is a master of this.
It’s Hegelian.
Helegian?? Lol. It’s Hegelian.
Even if Marx himself followed Hegelian dialectics, how does this mean that Fiorina is a leftist?
Basically, Hegelian dialectics says there’s an idea, an opposing idea, and then society adopts the compromise. The compromise becomes the new idea, and then there’s an opposing idea for that, and so on.
I’ve long wished the GOP would pay attention to Hegelian dialectics because the Left sure does. Every time a Republican gives in and compromises, society moves further to the left.
Why not pull the left toward the right? Really, what am I misunderstanding here?
You are trying to make conservatives look stupid.