Posted on 09/28/2015 10:15:39 AM PDT by detective
After largely staying in the background this summer as Hillary Rodham Clinton kicked off her second campaign for president, former President Bill Clinton is ready to take on a more active and public role in his wife's second bid for the White House.
Bill Clinton's move to deepen the political involvement in his wife's 2016 effort comes as she continues to confront the insurgent campaign of Vermont independent Sen. Bernie Sanders and the chance that Vice President Joe Biden could make a late entry into the race. Friends and former aides say the former president is eager to become a more vocal advocate for her candidacy.
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
“..I was talking about the alleged feminist Hillary Clinton, who can’t win without her man...”
Understood, but ANYONE and ANYTHING associated with her is in the same bracket. Incapable, inept, unaccomplished, a total fraud, and totally dependent on those that have ability (and money). Yes, if her last name was not Clinton, she would have been dusty history many decades ago.
Now take a real woman like Margaret Thatcher. She had a husband too but he never had to get involved. Maggie did it all on her own.
Same with Carly Fiorina and Sarah Palin. Not even sure if Carly is married as I've never seen her with a husband. As for Sarah, I only see her husband when he's riding a snowmobile or some such thing. Now good or bad, THOSE are liberated and independent women.
But this Hillary, she would be absolutely nothing without her husband. She even has to put up with his philandering because without him by her side to prop her up, she'd be nothing. What do they call the female equivalent of a cuckold? A cuckquean? That's Hillary for you, a cuckquean.
I’ve said all along that the voters want HIM back in the White House and this is why they will vote for the Harridan.
If Bill becomes THE FACE of the campaign he might be able to help her. A lot of voters like him. But I don’t think she’s willing to let him become the face. So I still hold the belief that if Biden gets into the race he’ll get the nomination.
PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!
WE have said No more bushes, NO more clintons, NO more obumas!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It’s a Two-Fer! Two America-Haters for the price of one!
THE PULITZER PRIZE-WINNING STORIES ARE PILING UP
How the “dead broke” Clintons got rich quick.
(1) Classified State Dept intel was found on the Clinton Foundation server....sold for honoraria, big-buck foundation donations, business deals.
(2) COLLUSION Bill connives foundation donations through Hillary’s State Dept action OR inaction.
(3) Clintons’ multiple business interests using “do-goodism” as a ruse-—gold mining, uranium mines, oil pipelines, banking, arms deals, pharmaceuticals, telecom, etc, etc, etc.
(4) Foundation laundry machines: Eaglevale Hedge Fund run by Chelsea’s husband, Goldman Sachs principles.
(5) Teneo laundry—employed Bill, Huma Abedin, etc etc etc
(6) Obama foundations’ cut of Clinton deals (CLUE: Clinton Foundation donates to Obama Foundation “for the children”)
(7) State Dept foreign aid tax dollars funneled back as foundation donations (see Cameroon Baptist Church’s $10 million donation)
(8) $6 billion found missing from Hillary’s State Dept when she exited.
(9) Hillary gave Haiti billions; brother gets gold-mining license.
(10) Clintons’ multiple hidden buck-raking entities (Bill just unveiled The Clinton America Foundation).
(11) Hillary hand-picks recipients of State Dept awards in exchange for foundation donations.
(12) Bill goes to Kazkhstan; Hillary approves Russian takeover of US uranium mines
(13) Clinton/Giustra Canada foundation hides donors.
(14) Clinton’s Swedish entity hides donors.
(15) Clintons get rich on tolerance and compassion, w/ an occasional good deed.
(16) MAIL FRAUD-—foundation raising money for one cause that went to Bill’s “pass-through” for another use.
(17) Rahm Emanuel was Bill Clinton’s senior White House aide, AND, a Goldman Sachs lobbyist...both at the same time.
(18) Rham Emanuel was Obama’s COS and ran the US Treasury—both at the same time.
(19) State Dept ignored requests WRT Hillary refusing to place Nigeria’s Boko Haram on a terrorist list-—Clinton Foundation big-buck donor, Gilbert Chagoury heads sprawling Nigerian company.
(20) Lukas Lundin heads Canadian-based Lundin Mining, w/ big-buck interests in the Congo’s mining and oil reserves; gives Clintons $100 million donation.
(21) Chelsea lied-—said the Foundation received “high marks” from a watchdog group (which she knew to be false).
(22) Bill, Chelsea and Hillary Clinton Foundation underwritten by $16,000,000 grant paid for by US taxpayers.
(23) TAX FRAUD Board members were not advised of, and did not sign off on, Foundation expenditures. (Board members are fiduciaries required by law to oversee distribution of donations).
(24) L/E investigating the Jeffrey Epstein pedophile case found Clinton listed w/ 21 phone nos and email addresses-—multiple phone nos and emails are connected to money laundering and tax fraud.
Comments I agree with from: http://hotair.com/archives/2015/09/28/desperation-move-team-hillary-pulls-bill-off-the-shelf-to-salvage-primary-bid/
But I think there’s a bigger image problem underlying this strategy. The former First Lady has been constantly nagged with questions about her ability to come out from husband’s shadow, show that she’s her own woman and that this new presidency would be one of her own creation, not just a free pass for Bill to sidestep the 22nd Amendment. Further, Hillary has to fight to prove that she’s a tough competitor in her own right. Dragging Bill out of the closet at this point is going to bolster the image that she needs her husband to fight her battles for her and defend her from the mean old Republicans who are launching all of these “conspiracy theories” about her.
Is that what Americans want in their next president? And is that the message that all the feminists waiting for the historic, “First Female President” wanted to see? Traditionally, the spouses of candidates are seen as an asset, but in a much more understated way. Since most of them are male, their wives are often featured as being supportive, loving, great mothers and concerned citizens who worry about the same things that all of you do when sitting around the kitchen table. They aren’t portrayed as the puppet master behind the aspiring candidate.
Bill was once famously described by Hillary as “a hard dog to keep on the porch.” That description can apply to a lot more than chasing skirts, and if Hillary is ready to unleash the big dog she probably knows that there may be more than a few surprises in store down the line.
I didn’t think these two “boosted” anymore.
You know that these two are so low-down scummy that if Billie Blow J*b Boy can't get her polls numbers to turn around, they'll pull out that poor grandchild to make her look like "a regular person".
I think the only reason they haven't done it so far, is because it would make HilLIARy look older and more matrony than she already does.
You’re EXACTLY right.
Given Bill Clinton’s track record in recent years trying to help candidates, this is a good sign.
The liberal propaganda machine is making the assumption that Bill’s pleadings will actually HELP Hillary. I’m not convinced. He’s been all over the world, raking in his millions, dating Energizer Bunnies, and pointing his finger, but not much else. I’m not so sure he will be of much positive help to the new voting group that weren’t even in school when he left office.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.