Posted on 10/03/2015 8:44:08 AM PDT by aimhigh
Since most statistics on mass shootings in the world compare apples and oranges by not correcting for population, let’s get a chart that makes sense, shall we?
(Excerpt) Read more at ijreview.com ...
Try putting in all those scuzzbag African nations with all their local warlords killing the tribes they don’t like. They would be the top contenders.
Are there any statistics regarding how many were shot done by guns in
gun free” countries.
Those would be interesting……...
In 2015 alone - 45 rampage shooting incidents.
And the media will NEVER show this information in the context of this report, the narrative is simple
We need to disarm America so there will be no violence...
And the simple minded hand wringers will grasp on and try to do their part of “saving the world”
Downstream effect of Public Education, teach us to respond and not THINK!
The Prussian model instituted By Thomas Dewey, may he rot in Hell!
All of the nations on the list in this thread have RESTRICTIVE firearm regulation EXCEPT ONE!
Guess which one.
You mean, Obama lied?
Hey............I thought we were just (again) told that these kinda things don’t happen in westernized, civilized, industrialized countries. You mean the lyin’ king’s facts are, uh, umm, oh, incorrect? #factsdontmatter
Time to run a DNA paternity test?
Time to identify the genome of these Bad Seed bastards before they go postal and kill innocents!
Belgium?
Realistically, data on shootings per 1,000,000 for small countries is misleading and almost meaningless when related to the same data for countries with large populations.
That is due to the disproportionate impact of each occurance on small populations as compared to the impact on large populations.
Each shooting in the USA has only 1/10 the statistical impact of each shooting in a country with a population of only 30 million.
Obamanation lies and peoples die. From another article today concerning the shooting in Oregan by the liberal shooter Chris Harper Mercer
[The Federal Security Services (FSB) is reporting today that an American black-Islamist terror suspect, who yesterday committed an act of mass murder in the State of Oregon (United States), had been included on a list of 87,000 “known/suspected” Islamic terrorists that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL) refused last month to accept from the Federation due to its not being “politically viable in the present atmosphere”.
According to this report, the black-Islamist terrorist who committed this act of terror, Chris Harper Mercer, had previously been indentified by electronic intelligence specialists within the Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) as being an Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL) adherent after he had attempted to gain passage to Syria via Turkey during the first week of September, 2015.
By the Obama regime refusing to accept this terror list from the Federation, this report continues, Mercer was able to accomplish his terror act when yesterday he killed 9 people and wounded 7 others at the Umpqua Community College prior to his being shot and killed by local US police forces.]
Percentage of mass shootings in UNPROTECTED government-sponsored “gun free” agenda-driver kill zones?
I would like to see the statistics indicating the countries that give a slap on the wrist, if that, to criminals...and which countries put the bad guys in prison and keep them there.
a source would be helpful...
No cigar for you, LOL!
Good point.
And how many governments accurately report their data?
For that matter, how many governments actually collect the data or know the real numbers?
Every country doesn't have the same degree of pervasive Nanny State governmental data collection as we have become used to.
Do you have the picture of him with the Jihadi beard??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.