Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz Destroys Sierra Club President’s Global Warming Claims in Senate Hearing
Breitbart.com ^ | 7 Oct 2015 | Michael Patrick Leahy

Posted on 10/08/2015 6:32:22 AM PDT by Rockitz

Presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) is showing Sierra Club President Aaron Mair to be an ideological hack and global warming alarmist.

At a hearing of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Oversight, Cruz subjected him to a withering cross examination. Mair was reduced to stammering and frequent awkward pauses which he used to receive whispered advice from staff. He repeatedly referred to the discredited “97 percent of scientists concur” claim, and was unwilling to acknowledge valid scientific data that disproves the claim.

Mark Steyn, sitting in for Rush Limbaugh on Wednesday, called Cruz’s relentless questioning of Mair “a thing of beauty.”

Ten different times in his testimony, Mair claimed that “97 percent of the scientists concur and agree that there is global warming.”

“The problem with that particular statistic, which gets cited a lot,” Cruz rebutted, “is it’s based on one bogus study.”

The day began contentiously and Mair proved completely unprepared for the piercing questions posed by Cruz.

“In your written testimony you said that the science behind climate change and its effect on minority communities ‘should not be up for debate.’ I’m curious. For the Sierra Club is this a frequent practice to declare areas of science not up for debate, not up for consideration of what the evidence and data show?” Cruz asked of Mair.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2016election; aaronmair; climatechange; cruz; election2016; epa; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; popefrancis; romancatholicism; sierraclub; tedcruz; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: Rockitz

I wish Cruz would have backed up to one higher level and asked this bozo, “Just in general, not referring to AGW, but just in general, would the Sierra Club issue a retraction on a position erroneously taken on any matter, based on evidence provided that is contrary to that erroneous position?”

The answer MUST be yes. Then come back at him.


41 posted on 10/08/2015 8:02:56 AM PDT by SgtHooper (Anyone who remembers the 60's, wasn't there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
I’m proud to be in the 3%, but then I’m only an engineer...

John Coleman, the founder of the Weather Channel is an ardent critic of this hokum. The left and GW whackos won't even talk to him, because his arguements are so plausible, they would stammer trying to dispute.

42 posted on 10/08/2015 8:06:53 AM PDT by catfish1957 (I display the Confederate Battle Flag with pride in honor of my brave ancestors who fought w/ valor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

Must see video of Senator Cruz.


43 posted on 10/08/2015 8:16:44 AM PDT by Pride in the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smartyaz

Steyn, sitting in for Limbaugh, said that looking at the demographics of the 79 “scientists” that were included in the poll, more were from California than were from Europe, Asia and Africa, combined. Who knew there were so few “scientists” in Europe, Asia and Africa?


44 posted on 10/08/2015 8:18:13 AM PDT by Turbo Pig (...to close with and destroy the enemy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Ted knew he would get nothing but the standard line from this guy but did a masterful job of exposing him as the pawn he is.

BTW 97% of statisticians agree that the 97% cited by this guy is fraudulent manipulated data.


45 posted on 10/08/2015 8:19:45 AM PDT by Zack Attack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: biff

While watching the video, I was waiting for Ted to say something like, “Look. Let’s just take a hypothetical for a moment here. Let’s say, what *IF*. What *IF* it were true that the data showed no warming for 18 years? Would sierra Club change its position? Essentially, would *any* fact change Sierra Club’s position?”


46 posted on 10/08/2015 8:21:39 AM PDT by pjd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Zack Attack

Mathematics has proven the human caused global warming/change movement is based on error or a possible outright lie-—http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=230761


47 posted on 10/08/2015 8:31:47 AM PDT by yadent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Merit > affirmative action

Every time


48 posted on 10/08/2015 8:41:55 AM PDT by A_Former_Democrat (Eliminate "Sanctuary Cities" and "birthright citizenship" and other immigration scams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat
Capturrreggfre
49 posted on 10/08/2015 8:51:48 AM PDT by smartyaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: laotzu

thank you, entertainment for lunch hour


50 posted on 10/08/2015 9:06:30 AM PDT by Made In The USA (Rap music: Soundtrack of the retarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
I’m proud to be in the 3%, but then I’m only an engineer...


Engineers don't count, they look at the data...:^)

51 posted on 10/08/2015 9:11:03 AM PDT by az_gila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

Cruz Ping.


52 posted on 10/08/2015 9:26:31 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Mair is a total idiot. That the SC eould make him their prezzy is hilarious.


53 posted on 10/08/2015 9:31:07 AM PDT by Paladin2 (my non desktop devices are no longer allowed to try to fix speling and punctuation, nor my gran-mah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lou L

The statistic comes from a lame survey of less than 100 carefully selected alleged scientists. It’s totally bogus.


54 posted on 10/08/2015 9:36:24 AM PDT by Paladin2 (my non desktop devices are no longer allowed to try to fix speling and punctuation, nor my gran-mah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: smartyaz

Heres a research grant for you and you and you and...............


55 posted on 10/08/2015 9:53:55 AM PDT by Foolsgold (Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: smartyaz
It seems people forget that Greenland was once totally covered with grass and vegetation. So it was "warm" before, then the little ice age, then now we are back to where we were before the little ice age.

Also interesting is the abstract below (from link from the article) from the report citing the 97%. Note that it's 97% of those expressing an opinion on AGW.

"We analyze the evolution of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) in the peer-reviewed scientific literature, examining 11 944 climate abstracts from 1991–2011 matching the topics 'global climate change' or 'global warming'. We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no position on AGW, 32.6% endorsed AGW, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain about the cause of global warming. Among abstracts expressing a position on AGW, 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming. In a second phase of this study, we invited authors to rate their own papers. Compared to abstract ratings, a smaller percentage of self-rated papers expressed no position on AGW (35.5%). Among self-rated papers expressing a position on AGW, 97.2% endorsed the consensus."
56 posted on 10/08/2015 9:54:16 AM PDT by bobsunshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine
Capnnbture
57 posted on 10/08/2015 12:08:40 PM PDT by smartyaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz; MeshugeMikey; Norm Lenhart; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; ...
In related news, Mitch McConnell was deeply saddened.

DOOMAGE!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

Ted Cruz Destroys Sierra Club President’s Global Warming Claims in Senate Hearing

Kerry: 'We Have Climate Refugees Today'

Three lines of attack against Obama’s climate change rule

Global Warming on Free Republic here, here, and here

Latest from Global Warming News

Latest from Real Climate

Latest from Climate Depot

Latest from Greenie Watch

Latest from Junk Science

Latest from Terra Daily

Latest from CO2 Science

58 posted on 10/08/2015 9:03:40 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Democrats and GOP-e: a difference of degree, not philosophy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Thanks for the ping.


59 posted on 10/09/2015 8:43:19 AM PDT by GOPJ (Democrats want gun legislation? Fine. Pass a Bill outlawing 'gun free' zones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Pride in the USA; Stillwaters
Thanks for the ping. Cruz is a rock star.

Direct youtube link to the video:

https://youtu.be/d4baOeuRDK8

60 posted on 10/10/2015 11:22:56 AM PDT by lonevoice (Life is short. Make fun of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson