Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CRUZ PLAN TO STOP ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION: SECURE THE BORDER, RESTORE THE RULE OF LAW, AND....
TedCruz.org ^ | November 13, 2015

Posted on 11/13/2015 12:41:21 PM PST by Isara

SECURE THE BORDER, RESTORE THE RULE OF LAW, AND PROTECT AMERICANS

"It's not that we don't know how to solve illegal immigration. What is missing is the political will to get it done. And, as president, I will get it done. We will secure the borders." - Ted Cruz

Summary

We have a serious immigration problem in America. The American people understand that we must reverse the policies that invite criminals and terrorists to defy the law, allow manipulation of our generous immigration system, and reward illegal immigrants for their actions. Sadly, while the Obama Administration ignores our immigration laws and abuses its executive authority, the Washington Cartel refuses to stand up and insist that the law be followed.

We see proof of Washington's immigration failure every day. Across this nation, there are roughly 340 sanctuary jurisdictions, each of which is led by politicians who ignore federal law and endanger our children. Their lawlessness has been encouraged over the last seven years by President Obama, who has repeatedly tried to amend our immigration laws by fiat. He has issued no fewer than 20 unilateral directives through his Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to evade the law, often benefiting illegal immigrants at the expense of taxpayers and legal immigrants. Perhaps the only thing worse than President Obama's dictatorial behavior is Congress's utter failure to even try and stop him. This lawlessness must end, and it must end with the next President.

During my time in the United States Senate, I have consistently led the fight to stop President Obama's unconstitutional immigration actions. When Establishment Republicans teamed up with Democrats to reward millions of illegal immigrants with amnesty, I engaged millions of men and women across the country. Together, we defeated President Obama's attempt to pass amnesty, and we continue to lead the fight against congressional leadership each time it seeks to undermine the will of the American people.

A strong President can and must secure the border. Under current law, there is more than enough legal authority to do so; what is missing is the political will. In the Senate, I have stood consistently with the majority of Americans against amnesty and lawlessness, and I will do the same as President. I give you my solemn word that, if I am elected President, we will use that authority to secure the border, and to restore the value of American citizenship and the Rule of Law.

To strengthen national security, enhance the value of citizenship, and stop illegal immigration, we must take three steps:

The following outlines my plan to stop illegal immigration, restore the Rule of Law, and reform our legal immigration system to protect Americans.

"We stopped the Gang of Eight bill. Ted Cruz led the fight against the establishment. We would be living under amnesty right now if Cruz had not succeeded." - Rush Limbaugh

1. Secure the Border

A Cruz Administration's first priority for immigration reform will be to secure the U.S.-Mexico border. It is a travesty that the greatest nation in the world refuses to take even the most basic steps to prevent illegal immigrants from breaching its southern border. The porous border invites illegal crossings, exposes millions of American citizens to crime and economic harm, endangers the lives of those who make the treacherous journey at the mercy of cartels and coyotes, and represents perhaps the United States' single greatest national security vulnerability in the post-9/11 era.

To regain control of our border, a Cruz Administration will:

2. Restore the Rule of Law

President Obama, aided and abetted by a Congress that ignores its constitutional and moral duties, has abused his executive authority and refused to enforce the immigration laws that are currently on the books. These failures undermine immigration enforcement and endanger the American people. We need a President who will follow the law, hold those who break it accountable, and take seriously the duty to protect Americans. To restore the Rule of Law, a Cruz Administration will:

20151113_1

20151113_2

20151113_4

3. Reform Legal Immigration to Protect Americans

We must continue to welcome and celebrate legal immigrants. For centuries, our nation has been a beacon of freedom for people around the globe. And it is the promise of America, and the people she has drawn to her shores since her founding, that have made this nation the greatest engine for growth and opportunity that the world has ever seen.

Under a Cruz Administration, we will keep the torch of liberty lit. But to do that, we must repair our immigration system so that it once again serves American interests and empowers people all over the world to pursue the American Dream. With this in mind, I will institute a series of reforms to strengthen our immigration system, protect national security, and spur economic prosperity.



TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; corporatewelfare; cruz; debates; deport; elections; h1b; illegalimmigration; immigration; secureborder; tcruz; tedcruz; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last
To: Greetings_Puny_Humans

You are completely missing the context of when Sen. Cruz proposed his amendments. He was trying to prove that the gang of eight was determined to get citizenship for illegals and not just “bring them in out of the shadows.” He did this by proposing an amendment which would bring them in out of the shadows but forever prohibit them from getting citizenship.

As expected the gang of eight side rejected the amendment which helped to demonstrate that their whole agenda was to give citizenship to illegals. This in turn became part of the argument used to defeat the gang of eight bill in the House.

According to no one less than Rush Limbaugh, Sen. Cruz was huge part of the reason that the gang of eight bill was defeated. So, you can thank him for stopping amnesty, or, you can believe the lies being told about him by Sen. Rubio who was one of the leaders fighting for the amnesty that Sen. Cruz defeated. Ironic that some of you trump supporters want to spit in the face of one of your greatest champions while buying the lies of one of your greatest enemies.


81 posted on 11/13/2015 9:34:25 PM PST by dschapin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: dschapin
You are completely missing the context of when Sen. Cruz proposed his amendments. He was trying to prove that the gang of eight was determined to get citizenship for illegals and not just “bring them in out of the shadows.”

There is no context which justifies the fact that Cruz thought that "bringing them out of the shadows" was a goal HE supported and thought was part of common sense immigration reform, and since that time has avoided talk of deportation like the plague.

That's just a fact.

Who the hell cares if you oppose the pathway to citizenship, but think that granting legal status for the 40 million illegals will make a difference? Once legalized, they will GET citizenship, no matter what.

According to no one less than Rush Limbaugh, Sen. Cruz was huge part of the reason that the gang of eight bill was defeated.

But if Rush Limbaugh claims that legalization was never Cruz's goal, he is lying to the audience.

82 posted on 11/13/2015 9:38:52 PM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans

You don’t understand that the whole point of Cruz’s amendment was to prove that “bringing them out of the shadows” was not the goal of the gang of eight. He did that by proposing an amendment that he knew they would never approve. This then proved that the whole gang of eight bill was about giving the illegals citizenship and strengthened the resolve of the wavering conservatives in the house to oppose the bill.

His amendment was brilliant political jujitsu. But far too many of you trump supporters seem to be incapable of understanding what he was doing. You would far rather believe the smears sent out by Rubio who supports amnesty all the way.


83 posted on 11/13/2015 9:43:15 PM PST by dschapin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: dschapin
You don’t understand that the whole point of Cruz’s amendment was to prove that “bringing them out of the shadows” was not the goal of the gang of eight.

Again, this doesn't change that Cruz thought that bringing them out of the shadows was NOT a terrible goal.

If the Democrats and Rubio had been smart, they would have voted for legalization and simply left citizenship for some later date. If such a bill had passed, and it probably would have if they had kneeled to Cruz's arguments, we wouldn't be talking about deportation today. We'd be debating whether to give citizenship to the millions of "former" illegals marching the street next to BLM.

But far too many of you trump supporters seem to be incapable of understanding what he was doing.

I guess my problem is is that I take Ted Cruz at his word.

84 posted on 11/13/2015 9:45:56 PM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: dschapin
"And I'd like to make a final point to those advocacy groups that are very engaged in this issue and rightly concerned about addressing our immigration system, and in particular about addressing the situation for the 11 million who are currently in the shadows. If this amendment is adopted to the current bill the effect would be that those 11 million under this current bill would still be eligible for RPI status.** They would still be eligible for legal status and indeed under the terms of the bill they would be eligible for LPR status as well, so that they are out of the shadows, which the proponents of this bill repeatedly point to as their principle objective -- to provide a legal status for those who are here illlegally to be out of the shadows. This amendment would allow that to happen."

"And a second point to those advocacy groups that are so passionately engaged. In my view if this committee rejects this amendment, and I think everyone here views it as quite likely this committee will choose to reject this amendment, in my view that decision will make it much, much more likely that this entire bill will fail in the House of Representantives. I don't want immigration reform to fail. I want immigration reform to pass, and so I would urge people of good faith on both sides of the aisle, if the objective is to pass common sense immigration reform that secures the borders, that improves legal immigration, and that allows those who are here illegally to come in out of the shadows, then we should look for areas of bipartisan agreement and compromise to come together and this amendment -- I believe if this amendment were to pass the chances of this bill passing into law would increase dramatically, and so I would urge the committee to give it full consideration and to adopt the amendment." http://www.kausfiles.com/2015/05/21/cruz-and-amnesty-round-ii-the-telltale-video/

85 posted on 11/13/2015 9:48:28 PM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans

Your quotes prove my point. He was offering an amendment which gave them what they were claiming to want, ie legalization, but that he knew they would reject because what they really wanted was citizenship. It was a brilliant move to show how radical the gang of eight really was. I can’t believe that you are now jumping on board with a smear started by Marco Rubio, the very man whose amnesty bill Sen. Cruz led the fight to defeat.


86 posted on 11/13/2015 10:54:49 PM PST by dschapin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: dschapin
Your quotes prove my point. He was offering an amendment which gave them what they were claiming to want, ie legalization,

Which he characterized as his desire and as common sense reform.

Your argument is that Cruz never expressed a desire for, nor agreed with in any way, the granting of legal status.

You see the problem here?

I can’t believe that you are now jumping on board with a smear started by Marco Rubio,

I've been talking about this for months on FR. Rubio and the rest of the MSM are late-coming asses to what has been obvious from the beginning to anyone paying attention.

87 posted on 11/13/2015 11:07:37 PM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Isara

bump


88 posted on 11/13/2015 11:10:11 PM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans

What did you expect him to say, that he was offering the amendment only as a poison pill and that no one should take it seriously. Also, remember that at that time it looked likely that Rubio and his gang would be able to force the entire unnammended amnesty bill down our throats so our bargaining position was not nearly as good at the time. Say what you will, but Cruz did stop Rubio amnesty bill while your hero, Trump, did nothing to help us win that fight.


89 posted on 11/13/2015 11:21:04 PM PST by dschapin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans

Here is an article that explains in more detail exactly what Cruz’s amendment was designed to do and why it was part of his strategy to ultimately defeat Rubio’s amnesty bill. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/427046/ted-cruz-marco-rubio-immigration-amnesty


90 posted on 11/13/2015 11:33:13 PM PST by dschapin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: dschapin
What did you expect him to say, that he was offering the amendment only as a poison pill and that no one should take it seriously.

In other words, Cruz was lying to Congress. But that does not square with Cruz's consistent dodging and deceptive use of language with regards to deportation and amnesty that has gone on since that time:

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/08/ted_cruz_vs_donald_trump_whos_stronger_on_immigration.html

It is more likely that Cruz is simply lying to us, rather than building up a fantasy that Cruz never supported his own legislation then and even after that.

91 posted on 11/13/2015 11:35:55 PM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans

It was a legislative tactic to help defeat the amnesty bill and it worked. But hey if you want to side with Rubio and blast the man who stopped his amnesty bill then go right ahead and do that. There are none so blind as those who do not wish to see.


92 posted on 11/14/2015 2:31:19 AM PST by dschapin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: dschapin
It was a legislative tactic to help defeat the amnesty bill

Since when is lying to folks a "legislative tactic"? And how is it that he was "lying" to Congress when in interview after interview, Cruz has either told folks (back in 2013) that his goal was "enforcement" then "legalization," and in more recent times has simply avoided the question altogether, saying there will be a conversation about what to do with the people already here after he is elected?

93 posted on 11/14/2015 2:39:56 AM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: dschapin

Ok fair enough.

But...(you knew there would be one, right?) - all I saw in the first 30 posts was posts attacking Trump.

Is that all you Cruzers have to talk about? I don’t see Trump-supporters attacking Cruz first thing on Trump threads. We talk about Trump. And maybe bash Bush and Rubio. I think most Trump supporters have a lot of respect for Cruz (just not for the rabid Cruz supporters that attack Trump)

The 2 men get along wonderfully, and will hopefully end up working as a team. There’s been so much animosity created here that I doubt a team effort by them will be supported by very many!

Ps. I always praise Cruz when he is right. Look at my posts. I don’t see many of those rabid Cruz supporters ever saying Trump does anything right. It’s a lot like dealing with liberals, they are so fanatical.


94 posted on 11/14/2015 6:14:17 AM PST by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans

I’ve heard him speak many times about this amendment and his motives for offering it He used it as a strategy to defeat the bill and it worked.


95 posted on 11/14/2015 6:51:27 AM PST by conservativejoy (Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God,,,, We can elect Ted Cruz!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer
It’s difficult to legally require English proficiency when it’s not codified into law.

Indeed, because the metrics of how one determines "proficiency" can be tricky. Consider the deaf for example.

We will know he is over the target when the GOPe goes into full attack mode.

We already do. He's being ignored in the press compared to the Donald, who gets all the air time he wants with which to paint us as ignorant buffoons and witless chumps.

96 posted on 11/14/2015 7:03:18 AM PST by Carry_Okie (Dupes for Donald, Chumps for Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans
"This is the first time Cruz has made this argument about why. more than two years ago. he put forward these amendments—and it begs the question as to why he took so long to make this case. But an aide to Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), who fought alongside Cruz to eventually kill the Gang of Eight amnesty bill, confirmed as well that Cruz's and others' amendments were for exactly that purpose—and not a statement of his policy beliefs." From Breitbart:

LINK

97 posted on 11/14/2015 7:04:48 AM PST by conservativejoy (Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God,,,, We can elect Ted Cruz!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy
confirmed as well that Cruz's and others' amendments were for exactly that purpose—and not a statement of his policy beliefs."

IOW, he was lying to congress. But then this still doesn't explain why Cruz continually equated amnesty only with a pathway to citizenship, and refused to talk deportation for all this time.

98 posted on 11/14/2015 7:51:34 AM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy

Now that I think about it a little further— it also doesn’t explain the interviews Cruz made with the media, explicitly declaring that he was opposed to deportation and favored the granting of legal status.

The idea that none of this “expressed his policy beliefs” is absurd on its face.


99 posted on 11/14/2015 7:53:25 AM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans

He always emphasized enforcing the law. The law is deportation.


100 posted on 11/14/2015 8:00:40 AM PST by conservativejoy (Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God,,,, We can elect Ted Cruz!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson