After what the Muslims did in Bombay — there could be no doubt they could do it anywhere.
This could easily be carried out in GUN FREE ZONES. That has already been proven by our own wackos that live here!
Pack your desk sonny boy.
“Small randomized attacks cause a much greater sense of terror than one large attack.”
= = =
I figured from day one, 9/12, that they should hit a small town.
Rodeo, parade, car show, ...
Then we ALL would be exposed to the fear.
Whats so difficult about coordinating something like this?
1. Mohammed go to this address and start shooting at 9pm.
2. Mohammed go to the other address and start shooting at 9.02pm.
Maybe they got their Mohammeds mixed up?
I magine Black Friday, all the nutters need is a few dozen backpacks and pressure cookers placed at the right stores and you can cause some serious havoc.
New York, London, Paris, Madrid, Moscow, ROME?....................
Maybe true for attacking cities where the citizens are not armed... or for that matter... GunFreeZones in countries that are armed.
Sure, any idiot can shoot unarmed fish in a barrel.
Ok crapweasels, what in all holy hell makes you think that for some reason, Washington D.C. would NOT be the FIRST place terrorists gather and attack? YOU PEOPLE ARE DELUSIONAL BEYOND ALL NORMS OF SANITY!
With the element of surprise a small group, even with minimum training, could pull off a Paris style attack. Easy peasy.
So they show their hand with a “test” knowing the entire world is on alert? I don’t buy it.
Christmas shopping at the Malls in middle America.
Must be scary for liberal elites who eat in upscale Washington DC restaurants... and shop in small, but expensive boutiques...
Ok, look they can do it here and have had the capability to do it for some time.
They may not want to because being a free society means we are already armed and not opposed to rounding people up and holding them for a spell...
I’m going a little outside the box, but if I was an outsider looking at the United States, these are my thoughts about a terrorist attack here:
I think the terrorists learned after 9/11 that large, coordinated attacks in the United States will bring Americans together and lead to war. In the days and weeks after 9/11, folks of different attitudes and politics actually worked together. Yes, that cohesion was eventually worn away by the American left, but that also took a lot of effort.
So the strategy changed to smaller attacks. Fort Hood, the Boston Marathon, shooting at a recruiting center, snipers in DC. It’s much harder to build up national outrage over someone shooting up a room at a military base, and in any case, the left will be running interference the entire way.
My guess is that Islam is letting us cut our own throats while they watch us from the sidelines. Even now, there are many Facebook posts proclaiming that the attacks in Paris don’t reflect Islam. A young person who goes to college for a safe space isn’t a threat. Our media is consumed by sex and scandal, and our leaders are feckless. If this trend continues, we’ll soon have folks signing up to become Moslems out of admiration for their focus and fortitude.
A cold war in reverse, then, in which our society is surrounded, and slowly rots from the inside.
I know some out there are thinking, “Hey, speak for yourself, buddy boy,” and I’m actually in your corner, but as time progresses away from 9/11, I see less and less understanding of Islam, the threat of Islam, and a desire to fight for our own culture.
IMHO
Of course if they really wanted to build terror they’d avoid big cities and hit a half-dozen mid sized towns in all corners of the country - a school here, a church there, a shopping mall maybe, a football game perhaps - spread the fear around......