Posted on 11/26/2015 4:49:55 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
Star trek is a good example. They don’t use money and Rodenbury was a proponent of socialism. At least I’ve read numerous stories about it.
But even there some people are more equal. The capt gets a nice cabin while the junior folks hot bunk it. Let’s don’t even mention. What happens to the red shirts.
Truth is what the Party say it is.
>> Every day, NOAA analyzes vast amounts of data to predict changes to our climate
Taxpayer funded speculators.
[[NOAAâs climate change science fiction - ignores satellite data]]
Meanwhile the MSM ignores what NOAA did, and so the lie continues unabated
Has anyone taken a look at the differences between the limited number of surface temperature and satellite temperature measurements?
Multiple satellites each circle the globe every 90 minutes, taking hundreds of thousands of measurements, and providing global coverage. The data provide complete and accurate temperature data.
I would think that such a comparison would show that satellite temperature data are vastly superior to the limited and questionable ground measurement data.
ALL data supporting AGW is mined and sifted. Progressives have never had a problem ignoring the facts that don’t support the agenda. They just plug their ears and cover their eyes singing “LALALALALALALA”.
Ask these experts for a accurate local forecast down to the degree for tomorrows weather. Jail them when they cannot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.