NOAA’s climate change science fiction - ignores satellite data

The Washington Times ^ | November 26, 2015 | Lamar Smith

[driftdiver]

Star trek is a good example. They don’t use money and Rodenbury was a proponent of socialism. At least I’ve read numerous stories about it.

But even there some people are more equal. The capt gets a nice cabin while the junior folks hot bunk it. Let’s don’t even mention. What happens to the red shirts.

[Dr.Deth]

Truth is what the Party say it is.

[Gene Eric]

>> Every day, NOAA analyzes vast amounts of data to predict changes to our climate

Taxpayer funded speculators.

[Bob434]

[[NOAA’s climate change science fiction - ignores satellite data]]

Meanwhile the MSM ignores what NOAA did, and so the lie continues unabated

[olezip]

Global average temperature anomalies (daily differences from normal) have not increased since 1996-97: Satellite Temperatures have been flat for more than 18 years now.

Has anyone taken a look at the differences between the limited number of surface temperature and satellite temperature measurements?

Multiple satellites each circle the globe every 90 minutes, taking hundreds of thousands of measurements, and providing global coverage. The data provide complete and accurate temperature data.

I would think that such a comparison would show that satellite temperature data are vastly superior to the limited and questionable ground measurement data.

[Blue Collar Christian]

ALL data supporting AGW is mined and sifted. Progressives have never had a problem ignoring the facts that don’t support the agenda. They just plug their ears and cover their eyes singing “LALALALALALALA”.

[minnesota_bound]

Ask these experts for a accurate local forecast down to the degree for tomorrows weather. Jail them when they cannot.