Posted on 12/04/2015 10:03:56 AM PST by Rufus2007
Friday during MSNBC’s “Andrea Mitchell Reports,†NBC News Kerry Sanders gave an on-camera tour of the San Bernardino, CA shooters apartment at the allowance of the property’s landlord.
During that tour, several photos were shown on camera.
...(more w/video)...
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
I see no fingerprint dust at all either.
They don’t clean that up in my experience, that’s left to next of kin.
Insanity. Who is behind the contamination of the crime scene? Is there some connection with the government that could have been discovered, e.g., the fingerprints of government employees of law enforcement or intelligence agencies? Or is this an opportunity to plant evidence?
This is a huge, huge development that is ongoing. I watched CNN whose reporters were there. They said that not only were reporters going through the apartment, there were other people entering the apartment including a woman with some dogs.
It reminds me of the Jack Ruby shooting Oswald on live TV. How Ruby got that close and was able to carry out the assassination is still a real mystery.
Pull my finger.
Probably Obama's call to cohorts to plant stuff to make them look like sweet innocents. FBI would normally not allow tainting of a crime scene. There could be DNA evidence like hair in the carpets or furniture, allowing them to pursue additional perps. The printer electronics might hold memories of the last items printed or faxed. There could be bomb-making residue not yet discovered. Has to be Obama interference.
The official story is becoming less and less believable.
The media is deliberately compromising evidence to prevent and investigation into the terror network behind the attack. The FBI did not secure the crime scene. Evidence is compromised.
It can have only one result. The conspirators will not be identified and will get away.
Exactly. That “person” didn’t look “petite.”
This is like whack a mole...things keep popping up that just don’t make sense. The attorney, Chesley, description doesn’t job with what we saw. And we have seen NO photograph of the wife either. Why?
In a crime of this nature, they bag and tag everything after the photos, then take it away for later examination.
This is nothing but destroying evidence that might contradict their narrative they are writing.
If she weighed 90lbs, I weigh 75lbs.
I might believe 90kg.
I wonder how much OBAMA paid him?
Or, more likely, under her real name.
I’ve changed my mind — they need to arrest every single reporter and photographer that rifled through there. Even if they were “done”, that place is sealed by authorities.
Gobsmacked. The problem now is any evidence remaining in there related to possible associates is going to be RULED OUT.
I am no expert, but I do watch Miami CSI. They get all the evidence they need in the first 30 minutes!
/sarc off
I can’t get away from no witness in the building during the shooting saying “one of the shooters looked small and like a woman.”
So why would the lawyer say she was so small when size can easily be proved. And all this happens the day that “Ooops” we opened up their apartment and compromised the evidence.
I assume the media didn't find any while they were inside the house.
Deliberately done.
Yeah if that scene wasn’t officially “closed”, it is now. Anyone can claim evidence was planted by anyone walking through there.
I don’t know if Mashable is a reliable site, but I just read (elsewhere) thst a Mashable correspondent asked an LA FBI agent “why, this was permitted” and the agent was “stunned” like it was STILL an active crime scene. It was also mentioned that the landlord used a crowbar to pry the plywood from the front door.
I agree, this was deliberate to destroy evidence leading to other Jihadis.
This stinks to the high heavens!
Why weren’t there police on site guarding the place?
“Isn’t this tainting the evidence?”
Easier to explain away as it is put into the memory hole.
What happened today, AT THAT CRIME SCENE, is as big a story as the ordinal shooting.
Why wasn’t there a police presence there? Why didn’t anyone in the “herd” say “IS THIS LEGAL?” (The landlord used a crowbar!!! to open the townhouse).
WHY did this happen? Because evidence NEEDED to be tainted...and “workplace” violence can be the reason and everyone can go Holiday shopping, and you’re right...down the memory hole.
Thanks, did you get to view the video?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.