Posted on 01/04/2016 10:57:12 AM PST by COUNTrecount
Paging Donald Trump: Bill Clinton stumps for Hillary in New Hampshire but the women on stage behind him scowl, grimace and look like they'd rather be ANYWHERE else
A half-dozen females hand-picked to stand behind the former president grimaces, scowled and fought off yawns as he spoke in New Hampshire Event was Bill's first solo campaign stump speech in support of his wife's presidential ambitions A mother-daughter pair caught looking apathetic on stage were shocked to learn that they seldom smiled once Bill started talking The 14-year-old girl conceded that Clinton was a 'womanizer,' but brushed it off – although her mom was slower to dismiss concerns about the famous political Lothario making a campaign comeback Former U.S. President Bill Clinton made his first solo campaign appearance in support of his wife's White House bid on Monday in Nashua, New Hampshire, but the female voters standing behind him on stage – and one eighth-grader – were stone-faced and unimpressed.
They stood on risers through his 28-minute speech at Nashua Community College, alternating between frowns, grimaces and eye-rolls, even looking uninterested as they applauded a few of Clinton's lines.
While a largely appreciative audience hung on Bill's every word, an elderly woman at the edge of the stage cast her eyes downward and looked like she was having trouble staying awake.
And a young woman standing in the back against a Hillary 'Fighting for us' backdrop closed her eyes for significant stretches of time as TV cameras rolled and a girl in front of her scowled and fought off a yawn.
The New Hampshirites standing on stage with Bill were all smiles as he was introduced, but quickly seemed bored once he began talking.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
I was exposed to a number of Cankles’ TV ads over the weekend (her campaign bought several spots on the Big Ten Network’s coverage of the Iowa-Purdue basketball game). One ad really was the “fighting for the middle class” meme. The other was touting her abilities as “commander in chief.”
She narrated both of them. Now, I admit that I have a certain bias against her because she’s a criminal, but just listening to her voice was worse than listening to nails on a chalkboard during your worst hangover ever.
She comes off as insincere and very unlikeable, and this was in what was supposed to be a professionally done TV ad that’s supposed to make her sound sincere and likeable.
Bill loves stumping.
Sorry for your exposure to the Cold and Joyless One.
It is amazing to me that anyone can see her as the next President.
She belongs in jail, for many reasons.
I pray that Trump is her, and her husband’s, worst nightmare.
Pass the popcorn.
Let your guard down for just a moment, turn your back on Slick—and you’ve been diddled/violated.
And like all Democrats he’s immune from prosecution.
WINO. Got that right.
Be safe.
What, no Blacks nor anyone old enough to remember the “BlueDress”?
Maybe it’s from his years of drug abuse.
Why are all those people covering their crotches ?
cept the woman on the right......
Ding, ding, ding - we have a thread winnah!
Appears the rally in New Hampshire is not going to be attended by Hillary and the speakers are going to be Abby Wambach & Lena Dunham, two out of the closet lesbians.
Can’t wait to see the attendance numbers for that huge event. /sarcasm
It’s like referring to a thief as a shopaholic... the press is so dishonest.
The few Cankles commercials I saw made me feel sorry for the folks in Iowa. If Cankles spent money on commercials that had a regional audience, the people in Iowa must be getting this 24/7.
Ugh...
For all we know, 23 years ago, one of their mothers asked him what kind of underwear he wore. Now he's just a disgraceful pantload.
How small was the audience?
Maybe they're the answer to Mr. Trump's hillarious "Diamond and Silk" ladies who many times do the warm-up before his speeches.
No contest, I would say, LOL.
Leni
Charles Krauthammer on Hillary Clinton
Recently, Charles Krauthammer alluded that he had
no doubt some of the 30k emails Hillary deleted from her private email server very likely had references to the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal and a conflict of interest.
The Clinton Foundation is “organized crime” at its finest, and we are financing it.
Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton
Foundation works as a tax free international money
laundering scheme. It may eventually prove to be the largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. history.
This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and repackage it to be used for your own purposes. All tax free. Here’s how it works:
1. You create a separate foreign “charity.” In this
case one in Canada.
2. Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate
to this Canadian charity. In this case, over 1,000 did contributing mega millions. I’m sure they did this out of the goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. (Imagine Putin’s buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold millions to a Canadian charity).
3. The Canadian charity then bundles these separate donations and makes a massive donation to the Clinton Foundation.
4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors.
5. The Clinton Foundation then “spends” some of this money for legitimate good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 10%. Much of the balance goes to enrich the Clinton’s, pay salaries To untold numbers of hangers on, and fund lavish travel,
etc. Again, virtually all tax free, which means you and I are subsidizing it.
6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world’s best accountants, somehow fails to report much of this on their tax filings. They discover these “clerical errors” and begin the process of re-filing 5 years of tax returns.
7. Net result—foreign money, much of it from other
countries, goes into the Clinton’s pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor. This is the textbook definition of money laundering.
Oh, by the way, the Canadian “charity” includes as a principal one Frank Giustra. Google him. He is the guy who was central to the formation of Uranium One, the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia. This transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was Secretary of
State when the approval was granted. As an aside,
imagine how former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell feels. That poor schlep is in jail because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors for a guy promoting a vitamin company. Not legal but not exactly putting U.S. security at risk.
Sarcasm aside, if you’re still not persuaded this was a cleverly structured way to get unidentified foreign
money to the Clinton’s, ask yourself this:
Why did these foreign interests funnel money through a Canadian charity? Why not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation? Better yet, why not donate money directly to the people, organizations and countries in need?
This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling.Talk about devious minds.
Now you know why Hillary’s destruction of 30,000
e-mails was a risk she was willing to take.
Pretty good summary of money laundering 21st century style. Organized crime does the same things with legitimate businesses. They don’t care if the business looses money, they make millions. The Clinton’s don’t mind spending 10% or so on real charity work, but the remaining 90% well you know where that goes.
Just think, your daughter graduates from college, marries into a family whose father had been in Federal jails for fraud and other monetary crimes and is pardoned by then President Clinton. Chelsea has a $5 Million wedding, works for a television
network for an excessive $300K. Now 3 years later
purchase a $10 Million apartment in New York City. How does that happen?
Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled, dishonest
and criminal, and they are Slick! Warning: They could be back in the White House in January 2017.
As with most criminals, they begin with small amounts of theft or embezzlement and then, when they escape punishment, it emboldens them and the money and other crimes get larger. All one needs to know is follow the money and you will see the Clintons at the end.
Remember this when you’re about to cast your vote for Hillary. You will be supporting the head of a huge criminal organization.
Bill Clinton only drew about 700 people. Bet 1/2 of them were state and local Democrat officials and hangers-on.
Doesn’t look like Bill is going to be a help to Hillary; and maybe even a huge negative.
Cue up the “Bill really doesn’t want her to win” conspiracy theories.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.