Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Proposes Spending $4 Billion to Encourage Driverless Cars
Wall Street Journal ^

Posted on 01/14/2016 2:45:00 PM PST by Sub-Driver

U.S. Proposes Spending $4 Billion to Encourage Driverless Cars Mike Spector and Mike Ramsey Updated Jan. 14, 2016 4:41 p.m. ET

The Obama administration proposed spending nearly $4 billion over a decade to make driverless cars on U.S. roads more widespread in an effort to curb fatalities and traffic jams.

The proposal, which still requires congressional approval, aims to have federal regulators work with auto makers and others to craft policies and potential rules across the U.S. for policing autonomous vehicles that move without a driver at the wheel. Regulators would also test so-called connected vehicles that talk to one another to avoid crashes in designated spots across the U.S. under the $3.9 billion budget proposal.

It isn’t clear whether or when any new regulations might be adopted. Regulators said they plan to issue guidance within six months on preferred performance characteristics and testing methods for driverless cars and collaborate with state officials on policies.

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
4 Billion huh?

See money does grow on trees...........

1 posted on 01/14/2016 2:45:00 PM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Well, how about carless drivers?


2 posted on 01/14/2016 2:46:15 PM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“Dramatic Video Captures Driverless Car Doing Doughnuts On Busy Residential Street” (1/12/16)

http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2016/01/12/dramatic-video-captures-driverless-car-doing-doughnuts-on-busy-residential-street/


3 posted on 01/14/2016 2:47:13 PM PST by patq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Oh goody! Just what we need...


4 posted on 01/14/2016 2:48:10 PM PST by alice_in_bubbaland (When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes mandatory ... Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Somebody will still lend us money ?


5 posted on 01/14/2016 2:49:32 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) since Nov 2014 (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

We as nation can afford — NOT to spend that money.


6 posted on 01/14/2016 2:51:39 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
So, when the leftists manage to get rid of all but 500,000 people in the US, they will still have the illusion that there are a lot of people hanging around due to all the driverless cars.

Huh.

But, who is going to do their yards for them and clean their pools?

7 posted on 01/14/2016 2:52:22 PM PST by Slyfox (Ted Cruz does not need the presidency - the presidency needs Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

I prefer people-less government.


8 posted on 01/14/2016 2:52:53 PM PST by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Insane. Has Hussein not been reading about all the researching being done in the private sector? He thinks the governemnt can do better. Why not research a better iPhone? Surely the gummint cans do better than Apple /sarc.


9 posted on 01/14/2016 2:53:50 PM PST by Tzfat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

One might think the auto companies would work on this.


10 posted on 01/14/2016 2:55:39 PM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

http://www.usdebtclock.org

Enforcer of economic slavery of us, our children and generations not yet born -

https://www.irs.gov

Plunderers -

https://www.congress.gov

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Ballot box


11 posted on 01/14/2016 2:56:53 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tzfat

I thought they wanted to get cars off the road! Now they want more cars?


12 posted on 01/14/2016 2:57:57 PM PST by truthandlogic (you are a free individual, with a free will, endowed by your creator with certain inalienable rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

No. Politicians are already spending more than $400B a year more than they take in, and our kids will have to pay for that massive $19T-plus debt. If car makers want to sell driverless cars, they should pay for the design costs. If buyers want driverless cars, the buyers should pay the market rate for the cars they want. There is no excuse (other than the actual one - corruption) for FedGov giving my money to these companies.


13 posted on 01/14/2016 2:58:39 PM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
The proposal, which still requires congressional approval

Why? The stupid chimp still has a pen and a phone, doesn't he?

14 posted on 01/14/2016 2:59:06 PM PST by grobdriver (Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

A driverless car in every driveway by 2025.

IF I wuz a Teamster or a trucker, I’d be looking out for them little fellars.


15 posted on 01/14/2016 3:00:49 PM PST by NormsRevenge (SEMPER FI!! - Monthly Donors Rock!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

4 billion to spend on something car companies were perfectly willing to spend to develop themselves so they can claim “See we created driverless cars.”


16 posted on 01/14/2016 3:09:05 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

So they want the driverless cars? For what? To drive you to the nearest federal penitentiary in case you say or do something politically incorrect?


17 posted on 01/14/2016 3:13:07 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Terrorism, the thing that shall not be named by the MSM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Why don’t we just pay those people to stay home? Bring them pizzas and stuff.


18 posted on 01/14/2016 3:15:45 PM PST by USMCPOP (Father of LCpl. Karl Linn, KIA 1/26/2005 Al Haqlaniyah, Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

It is actually not a bad idea to get ahead of this.

There are a lot of communication protocols, traffic rules, signage, other legal issues, etc. that will have to be worked out over the next decade or two. The free market will take care of developing the actual technology for the cars - which are coming along quickly - but government, federal and the various states, will have to put a framework for use in place.


19 posted on 01/14/2016 3:17:23 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

why not?....we have a empty White House


20 posted on 01/14/2016 3:26:46 PM PST by Doogle (( USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson