Posted on 01/19/2016 4:59:59 AM PST by Kaslin
After months of watching all sorts of political polls, we are finally just a few weeks away from actually beginning to see some voting in primary elections. Polls let people vent their emotions. But elections are held to actually accomplish something.
The big question is whether the voters themselves will see elections as very different from polls.
If Republican voters have consistently delivered a message through all the fluctuating polls over the past months, that message is those voters' anger at the Republican establishment, which has grossly betrayed the promises that got a Republican Congress elected.
Whether the issue has been securing the borders, Obamacare, runaway government spending or innumerable other concerns, Republican candidates have promised to fight the Obama administration's policies-- and then caved when crunch time came for Congress to vote.
The spectacular rise, and persistence, of Republican voter support for Donald Trump in the polls ought to be a wake-up call for the Republican establishment. But smug know-it-alls can be hard to wake up.
Even valid criticisms of Trump can miss the larger point that Republican voters' turning to such a man is a sign of desperation and a telling indictment of what the Republican establishment has been doing for years-- which they show pathetically few signs of changing.
Seldom have the Republicans seemed to have a better chance of winning a presidential election. The Democrats' front-runner is a former member of an unpopular administration whose record of foreign policy failures as Secretary of State is blatant, whose personal charm is minimal and whose personal integrity is under criminal investigation by the FBI.
Meanwhile, the Republicans have fielded a stronger set of presidential aspirants than they have had in years. Yet it is by no means out of the question that the Republicans will manage to blow this year's opportunity and lose at the polls this November.
In other times, this might just be the Republicans' political problem. But these are not other times. After seven disastrous years of Barack Obama, at home and overseas, the United States of America may be approaching a point of no return, especially in a new age of a nuclear Iran with long-range missiles.
The next President of the United States will have monumental problems to untangle. The big question is not which party's candidate wins the election but whether either party will choose a candidate that is up to the job.
That ultimate question is in the hands of Republicans who will soon begin voting in the primaries.
Their anger may be justified, but anger is not a sufficient reason for choosing a candidate in a desperate time for the future of this nation. And there is such a thing as a point of no return.
Voters need to consider what elections are for. Elections are not held to allow voters to vent their emotions. They are held to choose who shall hold in their hands the fate of hundreds of millions of Americans today and of generations yet unborn.
Too many nations, in desperate times, especially after the established authorities have discredited themselves and forfeited the trust of the people, have turned to some new and charismatic leader, who ended up turning a dire situation into an utter catastrophe.
The history of the 20th century provides all too many examples, whether on a small scale that led to the massacre in Jonestown in 1978 or the earlier succession of totalitarian movements that took power in Russia in 1917, Italy in 1922 and Germany a decade later.
Eric Hoffer's shrewd insight into the success of charismatic leaders was that the "quality of ideas seems to play a minor role," What matters, he pointed out, "is the arrogant gesture, the complete disregard of the opinion of others, the singlehanded defiance of the world."
Is that the emotional release that Republican voters will be seeking when they begin voting in the primaries? If so, Donald Trump will be their man. But if the sobering realities of life and the need for mature and wise leadership in dangerous times is uppermost in their minds, they will have to look elsewhere.
Ping
Whats a poll, is it a Polish “pole?”
Sad but true, Dr. Sowell.
I see this and think back to at least one or two articles this man wrote a year-plus ago. I remember I got pretty pissed at him because it was a basic "you gotta vote for the most electable, second most evil candidate" for the good of all. Horsesh!t. To me, this is just a backhanded way of saying vote for Jeb, or Rubio, or even Christie. As long as it isn't Cruz or Trump. He can stick it where the sun don't shine.
“The history of the 20th century provides all too many examples, whether on a small scale that led to the massacre in Jonestown in 1978 or the earlier succession of totalitarian movements that took power in Russia in 1917, Italy in 1922 and Germany a decade later. “
In my opinion this is the meat of the column. Most of us are looking for an honest leader. The biggest question in my mind is, are we looking toward a charismatic messianic leader in the same manner as 1922 Italy or 1932 Germany? Of for that matter the US in 2008 & 2012?
I hope and pray we are not.
Really disgusting what we’re seeing. Keep praying and buy ammo.
There is no doubt about it.
I have posted before the eerie ironic analogy that the next president will usher in the 100th anniversary of the Treaty of Versailles.
The Allied Powers humiliation of the Axis Powers directly led to the rise of nationalism and emergence of Hitler and Mussolini.
The Progressive movement has succeeded in humiliating America and making it look weak and helpless. Trump is stirring up a new nationalistic fervor which America needs, but can Trump harness it?
Will populism and jingoism trump conservative ideology ?
America has been so beaten down that I believe it will.
Millions of Republican voters are pissed off at the GOP establishment. They have been betrayed by their so-called leaders. This is why the voters will be electing a Washington outsider. It will be Trump or Cruz.
Mr. Sowell knows that there are no other options. Forget Bush, Rubio, Paul, Crist, Kasich. The only other outsider is Fiorina.
To elect more corrupt idiots.
after the established authorities have discredited themselves and forfeited the trust of the people, the people turn elsewhere.
Sometimes it works out and sometimes it doesn’t.
I don’t expect much from Trump but what little I expect is sorely needed. In fact it’s almost exactly what Republicans promise and praise, but never deliver.
|
Dear Mr. Sowell, I have actually read your Basic Economics book and from time to time have found your commentary on Town Hall reasonable. However, very little in this current article of yours is a call to reason. On the contrary, it is an attempt to destroy a candidate by the very rabble rousing you condemn in the piece! So I think, Mr. Sowell, that twilight has long past. It's now time for you to return to your dark Ivory Tower sanctuary. Light a cande, clear the cobwebs from your desk, dip your quill in ink, and start scribing another one of those long-winded economics books. But please do not ever preach to Republican voters again about how to distinguish a good leader from a bad one — because no educated man or woman will find a single good argument about that in what you just wrote. Just because Republican voters are angry doesn't mean they are stupid. On the contrary, this election cycle they have proven very wise to detect the difference between: an experienced professional vs. a rookie; a man of character vs. a man of deceit; and a man not ashamed to show righteous anger vs. a man afraid to face the media's scorn. How you came to utterly hate Donald Trump — a man the people love — is quite flabbergasting given your prior proven ability to think and draw good conclusions. And yet, your article offers not one argument why he would be a bad leader — other than he has a "charismatic" personality. Charisma alone does not measure a man's value. For every Hitler, there is a Churchill. For every Barack Obama, there is a Ronald Reagan. For every Genghis Khan there is a Jesus Christ. The height of your hatred for Donald Trump is shown in this paragraph:
For the life of me, Mr. Sowell, how can you honestly associate Trump with some of the world's most reviled dictators and nut cases? It's outrageous — and once again, you offer not one argument in defense of this position. Seems to me, a man like Trump who can draw thousands of supporters to his rallies two or three times a week has listened quite closely to the "opinion of others". And when it comes to foreign policies, it's his opponents who are rattled their sabres. Seems to me, Trump has the level-headed wisdom, strength, and restraint to manage our foreign policy very well:
And that, sir, is the very reason he is winning the respect of so many angry — but highly intelligent — voters. Sincerely... |
....to placate the ignorant masses that shucks again, they almost made a difference.....like they got a couple numbers right in the lotto drawing.....
To give the illusion of choice.
EXCELLENT!! Did you mail your response to Mr. Sowell?
I’m pretty sure elections are how we make sure that our leaders have good hair.
>>In my opinion this is the meat of the column. Most of us are looking for an honest leader.<<
I’m not sure that’s true right now, but it might be the end result. Dr. Carson keeps plugging along with 8-10% in most polling despite now being ignored by virtually all the pundits, the media, and the other candidates themselves.
If most of us are really looking for an “honest leader” as you say, Dr. Carson might just surprise us yet. I doubt that, but I keep watching him with interest nonetheless.
>>He publicly opposed going into Iraq because he correctly anticipated the quagmire we would get into; and,
He has advocated smart ideas such as taking Iraq oil and putting pressure on the people who are funding ISIS.<<
You don’t see an inconsistency there? I’ll give you this though. That describes Trump perfectly. He says what he thinks people want to hear when they want to hear it. If what they want to hear changes, so will he.
Until he’s elected anyway. Meanwhile, keep hoping. That worked so well for us last time.
To enrich political consultants and advertising agencies............
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.