Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

REPORT: Ted Cruz Entered US Illegally in 1974
The Gateway Pundit ^ | 2/12/16 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 02/13/2016 9:12:01 AM PST by Dana1960

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. a retired colonel with 29 years of experience in the US Army Reserve, argues that Senator Ted Cruz entered the United States illegally as a child in 1974. His parents failed to file a CRBA form which is required by US law. Ted’s parents did not fill out the required form until 1986.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; Crime/Corruption; Cuba; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 1stcanandiansenator; 2016election; aliens; anotherobama; birthers; canada; canadacruz; cds; cruz; cruzbotfirestorm; cruzcrba; cruznadian; cruznbc; cruzrecord; cuba; election; election2016; eligibility; hearsay; illegalalien; illegals; imawingnut; immigration; luzer; luzers; newyork; newyorkvalues; nocrba; noob; sayanything; tedcruz; texas; tinfoilhat; tinfoilhattrump; topsecret; trump; trumpbots; trumpcoolaid; trumpcult
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 601-615 next last
To: LucyT

All Cruz has to do to put this to rest is release his Consular Report of Birth Abroad.

That he has not done so speaks for itself.

HOWEVER, his supporters are rock solid in their support. They will not educate themselves on this issue, and they will attack anyone who tries to bring it up.

I can see why Cruz’s supporters are sticking with him. This nation is doomed unless we turn back to God. Cruz is the candidate running as the most “Christian” candidate.

I still think our nation is doomed unless we turn back to God, but I now support Trump. They are not mutually exclusive.


521 posted on 02/13/2016 6:03:38 PM PST by EternalHope (Something wicked this way comes. Be ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope
 photo image_zpsadvc21an.png
522 posted on 02/13/2016 6:06:23 PM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies]

To: Mollypitcher1
That is not the point and your attempts at diversion are well recognized.

No. That is the point. You are putting a very petty issue ahead of SERIOUS issues, and you need to stop doing it.

We no longer have the luxury to worry about minor transgressions because we are facing SERIOUS constitutional transgressions.

Freedom of speech is under assault. Every other day I see another example of Liberal imposed speech censorship, and you are going to worry about a procedural issue?

Stop. Just stop. You can't see the forest because you are focused on a small tree. We need to worry about the stuff that's going to fall on us. That little article II tree isn't going to hurt us.

523 posted on 02/13/2016 6:06:26 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

Oh my gosh you people are nuts.

She was divorced from her first husband when Ted was born. She didn’t take her maiden name back. The birth certificate asked what her name was before marriage. She didn’t realize it meant her maiden name. She thought he meant her name before she married Ted’s father.


524 posted on 02/13/2016 6:06:39 PM PST by beandog (TrumperTantrum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 519 | View Replies]

To: piytar

+1500


525 posted on 02/13/2016 6:08:47 PM PST by DAVEY CROCKETT (1 John 2:22...the man who denies that Jesus is the Christ. Such a man is the antichrist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: beandog
Why are birth abroad statutes in this document?  photo image_zpss7t0fkrh.jpeg
526 posted on 02/13/2016 6:10:27 PM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 524 | View Replies]

To: Dana1960

It means the reservist Col jas no knowledge of the law.


527 posted on 02/13/2016 6:11:16 PM PST by Leto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Stop. Just stop. You can’t see the forest because you are focused on a small tree. We need to worry about the stuff that’s going to fall on us. That little article II tree isn’t going to hurt us.
..........................................................
That little Article II tree is sitting in the White House RIGHT NOW and you think it is irrelevant? Each and EVERY item in the constitution is extremely important, but I find it hard to believe that the eligibility of the President and commander in chief of our Armies is not as important as freedom of speech. They are ALL important and I will NOT bend to the continued destruction of the ONE thing that sets us apart as a nation.The Constitution of the united States of America is the Law of the Land. It is to be obeyed!


528 posted on 02/13/2016 6:11:56 PM PST by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 523 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
This likely the best SCOTUS case as it is all about naturalization

It's more about citizenship lacking considerations towards "naturalization" any language to that effect being found from within the dissent, and that consideration (naturalized? or no?) not being among the reasonings included from within majority opinion.

The majority made no mention of concept of naturalization be applied to Bellei in Rogers v Bellei when that concept was otherwise discussed. Instead, what was talked about was his citizenship from birth -- which Bellei did indeed lose -- for reason of not complying with the residency conditions which Congress, the Court found are allowed to require under the Constitution.

Bellei was challenging the constitutionality of the codes (the laws) which were applicable to him. It was decided by the majority that the laws were indeed "constitutional".

529 posted on 02/13/2016 6:12:10 PM PST by BlueDragon (TheHildbeast is so bad, purty near anybody should beat her. And that's saying something)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

A citizen born within the confines of the United States of parents who are citizens can lose that citizenship under certain conditions, those conditions being contingent upon the deliberate actions of the citizen thus born to officially renounce that citizenship.

That there was by Act of Congress conditions placed upon children born abroad of citizen parents makes those children no less citizens, thus stating that they be not "natural born" because of Congress's constitutionally supplied power to stipulate conditions of residency must be met in order to not lose citizenship acquired at birth, does not equate with being not "natural born" citizen.

530 posted on 02/13/2016 6:12:54 PM PST by BlueDragon (TheHildbeast is so bad, purty near anybody should beat her. And that's saying something)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

Ted’s mother’s birth certificate was never the issue.

The issue has always been the Consular Report of Birth Abroad that HAD to be filed in order for Cruz to be a U.S. citizen at birth. For him to be a U.S. citizen at birth that form was required under the law as it existed at the time of his birth.

The existence of his mother’s birth certificate is not in doubt. But the Consular Report of Birth Abroad has never been released. This whole issue would go away if it was.

I understand why you support Cruz. But you should educate yourself before you accuse people of being weak minded.


531 posted on 02/13/2016 6:13:11 PM PST by EternalHope (Something wicked this way comes. Be ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies]

To: BridgeOutAhead
The 14th amendment has never been adjudicated.

The 14th amendment has absolutely no bearing on this issue. Yes, shut up.

Yeah, you got a purdy mouth.

532 posted on 02/13/2016 6:13:42 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
 photo image_zpskwkqejgp.jpeg  photo image_zpsejbnpyai.jpeg
533 posted on 02/13/2016 6:13:53 PM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 519 | View Replies]

To: beandog

Nice try but I don’t buy it!


534 posted on 02/13/2016 6:13:57 PM PST by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 524 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope; Iscool; porter_knorr; Liz; Cincinatus' Wife; BlackFemaleArmyCaptain; Old Sarge; ...

From # 521:

All Cruz has to do to put this to rest is release his Consular Report of Birth Abroad.

That he has not done so speaks for itself.

HOWEVER, his supporters are rock solid in their support. - They will not educate themselves on this issue, - and they will attack *anyone* who tries to bring it up. -

I can/can't see why Cruz/s supporters are sticking with him. This nation is doomed unless we turn back to God. Cruz is the candidate running as the most "Christian" candidate.

I still think our nation is doomed unless we turn back to God, but I now support Trump. They are not mutually exclusive.

Ping to # 521 .

Thank you, EternalHope.

535 posted on 02/13/2016 6:14:12 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

Are you saying the babymomma ran off to Canada with the Cuban while still married to an American? Is it possible that the Cuban is not Cruz’s father, or that she’s a bigamist?

- - - - - - -

Do we have PICTURES of both possible babydaddys ?
We can figure out for ourselves ?


536 posted on 02/13/2016 6:14:36 PM PST by PraiseTheLord (have you seen the fema camps, shackle box cars, thousands of guillotines, stacks of coffins ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 519 | View Replies]

To: BlueDragon
 photo image_zpstaetuad0.jpeg
537 posted on 02/13/2016 6:15:41 PM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 530 | View Replies]

To: Mollypitcher1

Of course you don’t “buy” it because it’s the truth and makes sense.

You Trump supporters are’t much into making sense and the truth.


538 posted on 02/13/2016 6:16:36 PM PST by beandog (TrumperTantrum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies]

To: beandog
Oh my gosh you people are nuts.....She didn't realize it meant her maiden name. She thought he meant her name before she married Ted's father.

You're calling me nuts, and simultaneously "channeling" the internal thinking processes of his mother?

539 posted on 02/13/2016 6:18:31 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 524 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot2

Maybe to try to make things clear for dolts like you. Unfortunately, it doesn’t appear to have helped.


540 posted on 02/13/2016 6:19:17 PM PST by beandog (TrumperTantrum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 526 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 601-615 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson