Posted on 02/26/2016 5:55:06 AM PST by Kaslin
As a Reagan conservative this is a particularly difficult primary season. We finally have what many of us consider a near-perfect candidate on the issues at a perfect time in our history, but obstacles persist.
Admittedly, it's not like America got in this desperate condition accidentally. For decades, we have been electing leaders who have been undermining the American dream, and in the last two presidential elections the majority has virtually furnished what could be the final nails in the nation's coffin.
Thankfully, Obama had reverse coattails. His agenda was decisively rejected in both the 2010 and 2014 congressional elections, which led many of us to believe his policies weren't popular even if he was.
If there was any doubt about the public angst over the status quo, it has been removed with the rise of Trump on the right and Bernie Sanders on the left. It's bizarre that some voters' reaction to the failure of leftist policies is to double-down on them, but I've come to expect no less from leftist voters.
Sophisticated analysis aside, it's clear that the public is mad as hell and is not going to take it anymore.
What a perfect storm for the quintessentially conservative candidate, Sen. Ted Cruz, a freedom lover's one-man dream team. He's not just an ideal constitutional conservative; he is perfectly situated to capitalize on the anti-establishment sentiment in the GOP electorate because he has been in the trenches, proving he'll fight the insiders from within.
Then in rides brash businessman Donald Trump -- a wildcard of a political maverick -- and sucks all the anti-establishment oxygen out of the politisphere. He apparently has just the right personality, just the right bluster, just the right bravado, and more than enough money and moxie to mesmerize the disenfranchised class -- those voters who have seen no evidence that any politician, once elected, has any intention of addressing their concerns.
But is their anger skewing their vision and sabotaging their judgment? They seem to have rallied around Trump because he's convinced them he would close our borders, rebuild our military, create jobs and, overall, "make America great again."
But would he? And even if he would, would he inflict other damage?
To the first question my honest answer is: I don't know. On the second, I think that given his history of supporting liberal causes and politicians and many recent statements betraying an instinct for statist solutions, there's a good chance he'd inflict damage, on the courts and elsewhere.
Given the alternatives, it would be a reckless decision to bet the survival of the nation I love and my children's future largely on powerful rhetoric tailored for itching ears. On something so critically important I have to have more assurance than bold promises from a man with -- viewed in the most favorable light -- a stunningly ambivalent political history.
Meaning no offense, to support Donald Trump for the GOP nomination is a crapshoot -- a blind wager based on nothing more than violently shifting sands. How does this make sense when I can choose the real deal in Ted Cruz -- a man whose genuine patriotism and constitutional conservatism seep from his very pores, a man who is off-the-charts brilliant and so right on the issues that one's authenticity as a conservative could be measured, quite literally, by how closely his views conform to Ted's views and record?
Cruz is a full spectrum Reagan conservative, on economic, defense and social issues. He has concrete plans, not generalities, to unleash economic growth, restructure entitlements and begin reducing the debt, rebuild the military, seal our borders, defeat our terrorist enemies, reform health care, appoint solid, originalist judges and protect our religious liberties and innocent life.
It is tragic that people have concluded that you have to have a person with no experience inside politics to take on the establishment. Under that theory, Donald Trump would immediately become tainted on his first day in office. Additionally, Ted Cruz has actually already fought the establishment -- at great cost to himself.
Cruz is the antithesis of a politician with his finger in the wind. He is the one who took on ethanol on the eve of the Iowa election. He took on his entire party in budget fights with President Obama because he promised his constituents he would and because he believes it was the right thing to do.
It's ironic that Donald Trump, hailed as the anti-establishment savior, has supported and funded establishment and liberal causes much of his adult life, and to this day is getting less opposition from the establishment than bad boy Ted Cruz.
Even though Trump and a number of other Republican candidates have ganged up on Cruz, he has not changed his positions midstream out of political expediency. Even though he's not the only one whose campaign has been accused of dirty tricks, Cruz is the only one who has apologized for anything and has recently fired his communications director.
I appeal to Trump supporters to reconsider your decision. Why take a risk on the unknown when you have from Ted Cruz an established record of bold, anti-establishment action based on tried and tested policy solutions? Don't be put off by the label "conservative" just because too many politicians self-identifying as such didn't deliver. Ted Cruz deserves your consideration precisely because he did. He is also, from all indications, more electable in the general election.
I believe you are patriots and I understand and share your frustration. But I implore you to channel it wisely, judiciously and constructively. If we bet wrong we might not get another chance.
I have several problems with Senator Cruz.
1. Ever since he arrived on the scene he's been a one man stunt show, pulling stunts left and right to no reward. He's accomplished absolutely nothing with these stunts except getting his name and face on the news.
2. He presents himself as a conservative messiah but is deep in the pay dirt with Goldman Sachs, and has been less than honest about his finances.
3. His wife.
4. The "Messianic" message his campaign has been trumpeting. I have news for you...no matter what his loony father says Ted is NOT the Second Coming.
5. Glen Beck
6. His propensity to lie. He's consistently lied about his opponents, about their plans to remain in the campaign, what they think of the bible, their specific policy proposals. All in all Cruz has proved himself to be less than honorable.
.. our distrust of and animosity for each others candidate is something that cannot be fixed by appealing to reason at this stage—that has left the building I’m afraid...
Don’t give them any ideas. I’m sure they would be okay with this. After all, some of them are trying to get anyone who doesn’t support the Donald off FR.
Cruz as a supreme court justice would do a lot more good for the country than as President. Lawyers make lousy executives ... and even worse politicians.
No that arrogant pos got stopped because many on the right refused to vote for both the nominees in the 2008 election and the 2012 reelection. Perhaps you was one of them, perhaps not
Plus other than his mother’s birth certificate he has shown no evidence of U.S. citizenship such as passport, or CRBA.
I can’t believe Trump didn’t bring that up when Cruz stated that Trump would be tied up in court because of Trump University issue.
Wow! The desperation grows.
I’m sorry Dave, but I’m afraid I can’t do that. ~ HAL
Don’t forget his dad sewed $$ into his undies, long before he ever annoiTED his son. And, KaSick’s dad was a mailman.
Isn’t “bargaining” one of the stages of grief?
Donald Trump is the product of people who stopped reading John Locke and started watching Honey Boo Boo.
Yep....David Limbaugh has definitely outted himself, as well.
Limbaugh makes a reasoned argument, and mostly gets hate as a response.
Oh well, sure. I mean, insults are certainly one thing that will lead people to support someone in the general election about whom they have a lot of questions.
There is an ugliness to this campaign that is going to turn off a whole lot of voters who normally will vote for whomever is the nominee.
One man pipe dream is more like it. Cruz started his campaign by trying to win the so called conservatives who sat out the last election because they couldn't vote for Mitt Romney. Well...he's won those guys and just about no one else. There is absolutely no way that Ted Cruz wins in November. Ted has zero appeal to independents and zero appeal to democrats. You can't win a national election with just the most conservative wing of the GOP supporting you. No way. No how.
There's just no way in hell I'll ever change my vote from Trump to Cruz. I'd rather go swimming with an anchor around my ankles.
Dave needs to read and consider my analysis here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3401409/posts
I support Cru...and will do so until he ether wins the nomination, or drops out.
But the reality on the ground is, because of the three reasons I give in the link above...people are going to continue to flock to Trump, and you are not going to deride them, shame them, or convince them otherwise.
That’s the reality.
So, I will support Cruz, but be willing...when the general election comes along, because of the things I point out there, to support Trump 100% against Sanders of Hillary should he become the nominee.
I have several problems with the Donald.
1. Ever since he arrived on the scene he’s been a one man stunt show, pulling stunts left and right to no reward. He’s accomplished absolutely nothing with these stunts except getting his name and face on the news.
2. His supporters think he is the Messiah.
3. His cheating on his wives.
4. His support of democrats including having the Clintons at his wedding.
6. His propensity to lie. He’s consistently lied about his opponents.
On top of that he’s a loud mouthed, obnoxious bully.
Tired of being told what to do and how to think by the Limbos. Respect is a two way street.
I have no issues with Cruz as a true conservative and can count on him to vote in the countries best interest in the Senate. My issue is his ability to lead and get things done. Cruz has enemies on both sides as will Trump. More Reagan Democrats will be supportive of Trump that Congressional Dems may work with him than Cruz. Personality and leadership are intangibles that are tough to come by. Cruz just doesn’t have them.
Although I agree with David Limbaugh’s assessment, I applaud you Buckeye for articulating a pro-Trump rationale, rather than name calling, gratuitous insult, and ad hominem against Cruz and his supporters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.