Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/29/2016 8:42:13 AM PST by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: servo1969

They don’t have the upper body strength to pick up and run with a 200 pound man. They will get themselves and other marines and soldiers killed. Much less what will be in store for them if they get captured.

This is Obama trying to emasculate our armed forces.


2 posted on 02/29/2016 8:46:34 AM PST by Blackirish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

BFL


3 posted on 02/29/2016 8:49:47 AM PST by Skooz (Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969; Blackirish
LETTER SENT TO MY COGRESSMAN AND ALL SENATORS (December 2015)(AND WILL SEND EVERY YEAR FROM NOW ON)

The Tragedy of Women in Combat

Ash Carter’s announcement demonstrates this Administration’s attachment to a political ideology fueled by arrogance and premeditated ignorance. Any long period of study and vigorous debate has been among those mutually supportive creatures that have metastasized throughout the military to serve a social agenda bringing future needless devastation. Most of the points I highlight about women in combat arose first when the decision was made to do away with DADT. A lot of good men are going to have to die in years to come to cover up this disaster.

This tragedy of women in combat provides another reason I now always council men to never enter the armed forces. Social engineering that amalgamates feminist ideals everywhere has now become the over arching imperative to which all operational capabilities must submit.

However, combat operations too often demand unpredictably and unimaginably exhausting brutality to achieve victory. Therefore, only the highest physical abilities and most severe restrictions on human emotions and behaviors can foster the required high morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion required.

Human sexuality simply cannot intrude into this sub-culture where only those displaying the greatest savagery and endurance can hope to win. Resorting to war for national defense entails the ultimate Olympics of conflict occurring at the bleeding edge of existence where the unbelievable becomes the possible. In this meritocracy there is much less excuse for merging men and women into these struggles than exists for the athletic competitions held every four years.

Combat forms personnel into small, rigid, task oriented units that can then descend into a cacophony of shrieking, sobbing, crashing dissonance to orchestrate the killing of other humans without hate or joy. These people continuously face extraordinary stress and survive by acquiring the wisdom of wild animals that live in the moment without schedules for eating and sleeping.. At the point of collision, they undertake operations requiring sacrificial, primitive and intimate actions. Such environments are inherently chaotic, barbaric, and brittle. They can be overcome only by trained killers subject to a totalitarian leadership and narrow focus unimaginable for those who see any opportunity for the social alchemy popular in civilian life.

The regimental combat teams for infantry, mechanized and armored units are now the playthings of bureaucrats committed to equal opportunity and affirmative action. They are dismissive of warriors enduring the brutal carnage imperative for triumph. Institutional memories no longer exist for fighting ferocious, shrewd enemies such as the Germans, Japanese, Chinese, and North Vietnamese, who utilized a full array of modern weapons. If one notes the ribbons on any senior officer’s uniform, they show they fought only Arabs the Israelis beat three times at 20 to 1 odds. Such people now question the necessity for high standards which do not obfuscate or allow inferior female performance.

Women not only do not belong at the pointy end of the spear, but should not be holding it to the extent they intrude into the fellowship of combat arms which depends upon savagery for victory. As this tragedy unfolds I will remember the quote that, "Men sleep peacefully in their beds at night because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf"

All Combat Roles Now Open to Women, Pentagon Says
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pentagon-nbc-news-all-combat-roles-now-openomen-n473581?cid=eml_nbn_20151203

The Greatest Lie Ever Told - Female Rangers
http://usdefensewatch.com/2015/12/the-greatest-lie-ever-told-female-rangers/

Why Marines, unlike Army and Navy, are so against women in combat
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2015/0911/Why-Marines-unlike-Army-and-Navy-are-so-against-women-in-combat?cmpid=editorpicks&google_editors_picks=true

General Martin E. Dempsey
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Dempsey

Gen. Dempsey: If Women Can’t Meet Military Standard, Pentagon Will Ask ‘Does It Really Have to Be That High?’
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/gen-dempsey-if-women-can-t-meet-military-standard-pentagon-will-ask-does-it-really-have

Coed Combat Units - A bad idea on all counts
http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/coed-combat-units_697822.html

You’re In the New Army Now
http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2013/01/youre-in-new-army-now.html
Marine Corps boot camp, job titles to be gender neutral by April
http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/story/military/2016/01/06/marine-corps-boot-camp-job-titles-gender-neutral-april/78351756/
Be sure to check out the photo of Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus. He looks to me like someone who should be holding personnel seminars at Health and Human Services. I would not want to have anything to do with the gooey product resulting from the fulfillment of his vision. I think it is time to retire the service dress blues for a mauve uniform with a pink stripe and fashionable French berets. Considering the defense secretary claimed a long period of study and vigorous debate, I maintain discussion was among those mutually supportive creatures that have metastasized throughout the military to serve the LGBT and feminist social agendas. Most of the points I highlight below about women in combat first arose when the decision was imposed to do away with DADT. A lot of good men are going to have to die in years to come to cover up this needless disaster.

The Great Social Experiment Takes the Field - In the War of 2020
http://usdefensewatch.com/2016/02/the-great-social-experiment-takes-the-field-in-the-war-of-2020/

5 posted on 02/29/2016 8:54:17 AM PST by Retain Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

The AR in the photo is nearly as big as the women holding it. AR rifles are that long. She must be tiny. Guess she’ll make a smaller target.


7 posted on 02/29/2016 8:55:02 AM PST by pleasenotcalifornia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Anybody seen what the Yazidi women and Israeli women do with the weapons they are given?


8 posted on 02/29/2016 8:55:43 AM PST by redhead (NO GROUND TO THE DEVIL! Remember BENGHAZI! Use WEAPONIZED PRAYER. NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Let the militant lesbians and militant feminists into the combat roles.

That’s one way to get rid of them!


9 posted on 02/29/2016 8:55:45 AM PST by MeganC (The Republic of The United States of America: 7/4/1776 to 6/26/2015 R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

In the irrational dehumanized Marxist “utopian” totally CONTROLLED world, where children are conditioned to believe boys are girl and girls are boys, and babies are bought, sold, and killed, and created with no biological mother and father united in sacred matrimony ——human beings and Life becomes just a meaningless object for the State to control—a “Means to an End” with no meaning, Free Will, Individual characteristics or sexual identity, and no absolutely no individual worth—just “group” “rights” and no significance or power as an individual human being (which is the BASIS of our Constitution—individual Natural Rights from God only—never the State).

The irrational concepts that male and female are not unique differences (that radical egalitarianism so loved by irrational Marxists who have to reduce man to interchangeable drones-—to destroy Free Will, Reality for children has to erase ALL differences so they can force little babies to believe the most irrational things-—like Vice is Virtue and Slavery is Freedom.

In the trans-humanisim world-—people are objects and pawns for the super-elite satanists/bankers who will control the masses like their chess pieces and for their sick, satanic, sodomite (total dehumanization) amusement.


10 posted on 02/29/2016 8:57:03 AM PST by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

It is all about reducing individuals to totally interchangeable units usable in any trainable job. Ultimately that will require standardization of IQs in the serf population while permitting higher IQs among the rulers. To accomplish that, at least with the present technology, the period in which abortion is required would have to continue from conception until the age when IQ is measurable.


11 posted on 02/29/2016 8:57:41 AM PST by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberaliI won't vote for Rubio of sono feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

It’s a stupid idea.
However;

It is also a less stupid idea than having women fill up slots in deployable MOS fields and then not go on combat tours. That reduces the ability of the military to give combat troops non combat billets between combat tours.

How about we restore one set of physical and mental standards for the military? Then people who lack the physical capacity for the job won’t be there. We won’t be “rejecting women” just insuring the best survival likelihood for all personnel.


17 posted on 02/29/2016 9:06:41 AM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

The feminists want women in combat so as to “prove” that women and men are exactly equal. They don’t care if people are killed as a result of it.


21 posted on 02/29/2016 9:24:06 AM PST by I want the USA back (The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. Orwell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

The Russians and the Israelis both tried women in combat.
Both quickly determined it was impractical for a whole host of reasons and reversed course.

Of course now we’ve got the SMARTEST PEOPLE WHO EVER LIVED in charge..... /s


23 posted on 02/29/2016 9:27:04 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

The feminist and homosexual ideology of neuterization takes another step.


24 posted on 02/29/2016 9:30:04 AM PST by Socon-Econ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Whole thing’s incredibly stupid. The one big subject nobody touches is the effect of “magic”.

Any idea how corrosive sexual/romantic connections are to a unit’s cohesion? PFC A is in love with PFC B who is in turn in love with sergeant C. Meanwhile, who gets assigned to the dangerous missions? Certainly not the sergeant’s main squeeze and everyone in the outfit knows it, particularly the guy that does pull point or night ambush instead.

Imagine how those who don’t have a girlfriend will feel when others are making out just fine in the same remote hellhole. Do you think there might be resentments? How safe will the lucky one feel with the unlucky ones on the hook to help them out in a tough patch?

Those interconnections will destroy units and make them useless in combat. There are very important reasons to keep units completely clear of those connections, the most important being that combat units need to trust that there is no favoritism when lives are on the line.


27 posted on 02/29/2016 9:43:00 AM PST by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Ted Cruz said, “HELL NO”.


28 posted on 02/29/2016 9:49:43 AM PST by CyberAnt ("Peace Through Strength")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969
I remember reading that the Viet Cong ordered their women NOT to engage American troops in hand to hand combat. Can't remember where I read it but even those fanatics recognized the limitation of women in combat.

Anyone else know or heard of this?

31 posted on 02/29/2016 11:59:59 AM PST by protest1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969
If the lesbians and feminists want their sisters in combat duty, because we are all the same, then selective service registration for all women turning 18!!

That may make them reverse course, but better would be to bring the draft back for our children to help them grow up and learn about life in the world. Best thing that ever happened to my 19 year old son, not into drugs or crazy stuff just not motivated, lazy.

He said everyday the sergeant in charge of training would just rip into all of the recruits parents. How f**ked up they were for raising such pansies, that they have their work cut out for them reversing all the parental damage done to them. lol

33 posted on 02/29/2016 2:29:42 PM PST by thirst4truth (America, What difference does it make?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

An infantry solder is basically a pack mule with a rifle. This is not for women.


36 posted on 02/29/2016 6:40:44 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson