Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Donald Turns Into a Pumpkin
Washington Beacon ^ | 4 Mar 16 | Matthew Continetti

Posted on 03/04/2016 4:09:28 AM PST by elhombrelibre

Donald Trump had by far his worst debate of the 2016 campaign on Thursday. He was defensive and vulgar, evasive and condescending, rude and imperious. He moved drastically to the center on immigration, repudiating his position on H-1B visas on stage and saying “everything is negotiable,” including the border wall and the fate of illegal immigrants already in the United States. He defended his calls for expansive torture and the killing of civilians related to terrorists, saying the military “will do what I tell them” even if his orders contradict the law. He dismissed his opponents as “little Marco” and “lying Ted” and bragged about his manhood. Over two hours he provided reams and reams of material for Hillary Clinton’s ad writers. And through it all he was cheered by a raucous and heckling audience that seemed to have been transported straight from the courtroom scene in “Encounter at Farpoint.”

The spectacle made me ill. On screen I watched decades of work by conservative institutions, activists, and elected officials being lit aflame not only by the New York demagogue but by his enablers who waited until the last possible moment to criticize and try to stop him. And even then it may be too late.

I sometimes wonder whether Trump chose to run as a Republican because he identified the GOP as the weaker of the two parties. His politics line up favorably with Democrats, and he has supported Democrats in the past. But the Republicans had been so buffeted by 20 years of inattention to the costs of globalization, by the growing estrangement of traditional constituencies who have lost status and resources in the twenty-first century, by the mistakes and narrow-mindedness of the party elite, that clearly the party of Lincoln was the easier mark. Trump called the bluff of the Beltway establishment. He proved that the ghost of Jack Kemp doesn’t move the party base. The ghost of Nixon does.

There was no winner at the debate, but there was certainly a loser: The GOP. It started this election cycle in a strong position, and is now on the precipice of nominating a political neophyte, a caricature of everything liberals hate about Republicans, whose unfavorable ratings are sky-high and who loses to Hillary Clinton in practically every poll. The best hope of the anti-Trump forces is to somehow prevent him from winning the number of delegates necessary to secure the nomination outright, and deliver the nomination to someone else at the party’s convention. I’m skeptical. It’s a last-ditch attempt, and if the party wants to nominate Trump, that’s its choice. But in doing so it would crown as the heir to Lincoln and TR and Eisenhower and Reagan a man who every day finds new ways to polarize, repel, infuriate, exhaust, shock, and horrify.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1reallystupidpost; 1stcanadiansenator; 2016trump; assclownposter; backbaconforcruz; cheeze; clownsforcruz; cruzintohillary; cruzquitnow; cruzsmearbots; cruztolose; cuckservatives; elhombrelibretroll; gangof14; gohometed; hollahollaholla; holywarriorsforted; mapleleafhero; moosebitcruz; moosebitsister; mud; mudmud; mudmudmud; mudmudmudmud; mudmudmudmudmud; mudmudmudmudmudmud; propagandadujour; screamingmorons; scumbagsforted; sodoffswampy; tdscoffeclutch; tediban; tedsmeltdown; tedspacificpartners; timefortrumptoquit; totallosercruz; trumpbotlosers; usualsuspect; wellthistimehellquit; willthemudstick; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-146 next last
To: VanDeKoik
He always “awlful”, always “terrible”, always having these gigantic “meltdowns”, and the Cruz crew on FR runs around screeching about it.....and then act stupefied when people that are not filled with rage against Trump, simply don’t care.

Talk about screeching. Look at the words you use against anyone who dares comment about Trump with anything but glowing superlatives? Rage? Stupefied?

You could have just said: "I thought he did great." or "I disagree."

Instead, you're like an attack dog on every thread, for God's sake.

Don't you ever get tired of your over-the-top Trump fangirling? Because I do, and I doubt I'm the only one.


61 posted on 03/04/2016 5:07:59 AM PST by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TTFlyer

So you’re saying acting like Trump is better than acting like a Christian? And acting like Christians wins no converts?


62 posted on 03/04/2016 5:11:41 AM PST by elhombrelibre (Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution. Go Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein; elhombrelibre
Wow! Vulgar and imperious at the same time! Quite a feat. The only person I really know who could possibly fit that description is: elhombrelibre. Vulgar, stupid, obsessed with The Donald’s sex organs and thinks he’s always right!

As I understand the whole “small hands” or more precisely the “small fingered” meme started many years ago, in the ‘80’s with Spy Magazine’s then contributor Graydon Carter (now a Vanity Fair editor) who in an essay referred to Trump as being “a short-fingered vulgarian”. Spy magazine also referred to Trump as “a well-fed condo hustler”, “an ugly cuff-link buff”, “a close-friend-free millionaire”, and “a Forbes 400 dropout”.

But the ever vain and thin skinned Trump went on the offence over the size of his fingers and has for over the last 25 years sent pictures of Trump’s hands to Carter, often circled in gold sharpie to prove he doesn’t have small hand or small fingers.

Trump defended his phalanges to Page Six in 2011.

"My fingers are long and beautiful, as, it has been well documented, are various other parts of my body," Trump said.

So to be completely honest it was Trump who first associated the size of his hands or fingers with other “various parts” of his body (insert penis size joke here).

If Trump hadn’t lowered himself to so obsessively respond over the course of 25 years to an insult from someone that most people had never heard of or ever read in a satirical magazine that few have ever heard of, live alone read, nobody would have known that Trump was so sensitive about the size of his hands or of his fingers nor associated that with Trump’s own obsession about that being a dig against the size of his “manhood”.

With that being said, I think Rubio was IMO stupid to lower himself to the insults but then again Trump started it by insulting Rubio, the size of his ears ““He has really large ears, the biggest ears I’ve ever seen” and his height “Little Marco” and making comments on sweat.

Trump can sure dish it out but he’s long proven that he can’t take it.

63 posted on 03/04/2016 5:12:55 AM PST by MD Expat in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

Oh please spare us the sanctimonious narrative. The debate was set up like some kind of Roman entertainment at the Colosseum. The interviewers were like the emperor’s (GOP) little mouthpieces and the crowd sounded like something out of Ben Hur. I did love the kids doing all kinds of antics behind Kelly’s head. Opps...I’m getting off track, this is suppose to be about Trump turning into a pumpkin, not Fox News and their debate holding skills continuing to be a lemon.


64 posted on 03/04/2016 5:13:36 AM PST by MagnoliaB (You can't always get what you want but if you try sometime you might find, you get what you need.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

Oh so people that support Trump should....let me see....just shut up, while you self-righteous Cruz sycophants just call us names, question our conservatism, faith, competence, and all manner of frigging insults you people pass between each other?

You clowns even write in some of your taglines.

And why should people keep quiet? To spare your high and mighty ears from having to hear us subhuman sum tell you to screw off?


65 posted on 03/04/2016 5:14:02 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
I tuned in only briefly, and while I agree with the assessment that Trump did not do well, Megyn Kelley was teed up with all sorts of anti-Donald hit pieces. I would think that there wouldn't be too many with the sort of baggage Trump has to do well.

The only thing I ask is, where were all these investigative reports, these undercover stories when Obama was running? Where are the video accounts showing Hillary going back and forth on minced words and double-speak? Are Republicans the only kind of candidates worthy of investigative reporting?

66 posted on 03/04/2016 5:14:57 AM PST by Lou L (Health "insurance" is NOT the same as health "care")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

“Acting like a Christian?” And who is the judge of that - you?


67 posted on 03/04/2016 5:15:38 AM PST by TTFlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
Take a pill, man.


68 posted on 03/04/2016 5:19:06 AM PST by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

Oh no this means I’ll have to stay home because I won’t vote for the GOPe candidate. /s/


69 posted on 03/04/2016 5:20:24 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MD Expat in PA

Since I actually had a subscription to Spy, which was a good magazine in its time, I’m well aware of the original satirical articles sponsored by fancy-haired Graydon Carter. Of course, trying to explain New York humor to people who have no sense of humor is nigh-on impossible on FR. Trump has a wild sense of humor (try watching one of his rallies) and has been hilarious in extolling the beauty of his hands. Now you either get that or you don’t, ok? But to take it seriously shows a complete lack of humor and, or, a purposeful misreading of him. With the media I would say it’s a purposeful misreading. With you, unfortunately, it’s having all the humor of a Smothers Brother.


70 posted on 03/04/2016 5:22:42 AM PST by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Turks (Muslims))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby; All
Trump’s money quote of the night: “Everything’s negotiable.” Then he demonstrated that to his adoring fans by reversing his position on H1Bs right in their face.


71 posted on 03/04/2016 5:24:34 AM PST by mac_truck (aide toi et dieu t'aiderai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: TTFlyer

Let the voters decide. Trump says he could shoot someone and his supporters, perhaps someone like yourself, would be okay with it. I will be honest. That does not strike me as a Christian position. Trump and many of the liberals he’s financially supported support abortion. That stops a human heart every time. It doesn’t strike me as a Christian practice. Trump bragged about adultery in one of his books. As I understand Christianity, possibly different than you, that does not strike me as following the teaching of any Christian Church. Trump publicly cheated on his first wife. I’m no theological expert, but I’d say most Americans, the ones with traditional values, do not think of that as Christian behavior. Trump is on his third marriage. Islam practices wife shucking, but it’s not traditionally been a Christian position. Trump owned a strip club. I’m pretty sure that all Christian Churches do not support strip clubs as being like Christ. Trump makes a lot of money from the vice of gambling. Again, it’s not really been a virtue in the Bible, as I understand it. I get it. You’re down with Trump as a man of high ethics and integrity. Trump University proves to you he’s an educator, too, I suppose. As for me, I don’t think he’s an example I want in the White House, like his friend Bill Clinton. Then, throw in his obvious ignorance of policy and his demeaning of any discussion and discourse, and I’m pretty sure we don’t have a good candidate in Trump.


72 posted on 03/04/2016 5:24:45 AM PST by elhombrelibre (Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution. Go Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: TTFlyer
Adopting a “holier than thou” attitude wins no converts.
Unfortunately, presenting facts to Trump fans wins no converts.
73 posted on 03/04/2016 5:26:00 AM PST by Johnny B. (Donald Trump: the choice of the Jerry Springer generation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

Trump’s mid-Jan twitter meltdown proved he really does delight in setting people against each other... it’s not some WWE act. He instructed his cult to destroy Cruz and his supporters personally and by any means and has mocked his own cult for their mindless devotion. They don’t care. He activated the Swarm switch and they are powerless to switch it off. Amazing how 1/2 of FReepers are OK with being owned, possessed. Scary.


74 posted on 03/04/2016 5:26:34 AM PST by txhurl (Votin' for Cruz, then Jeff if necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

Donald Trump had by far his worst debate of the 2016 campaign on Thursday...

Matt you are a Mitt!-)

Go Trump Go!


75 posted on 03/04/2016 5:29:14 AM PST by Harpotoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Does not matter what Scalia said. Trump said that the military will do what I tell them even if his orders contradict the law.
Do you agree with this? Do you even think our military would do this. Do you want our military to carry out illegal orders?
76 posted on 03/04/2016 5:29:52 AM PST by texhenry (Cruz is the only conservative in the race)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

Matthew Continetti is BILL KRISTOL’S SON IN LAW.
Full disclosure


77 posted on 03/04/2016 5:32:41 AM PST by Fast Ed97
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hawkaw

That just puts a need for more light to be shed upon Dons’ remarks to the Times and further digging into his past positions on the matter.


78 posted on 03/04/2016 5:35:26 AM PST by JEDI4S (I don't mean to cause trouble...it just happens naturally through the Force!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: texhenry

I think Trump will get the same respect from the Military as W had!
I think the Military would love to actually do the Jobs they are trained to due except when it comes to illegal orders)!
Again Donald holds a lot of Bluster.
Like Tear down that wall!
Evil Empire!
Axis if Evil!


79 posted on 03/04/2016 5:36:42 AM PST by Harpotoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: patq
In 8 years he still won't be eligible.
80 posted on 03/04/2016 5:36:57 AM PST by ASA Vet (Jus Soli + Jus Sanguinis = NBC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-146 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson