Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz PAC Attacks Melania Trump Then #NeverTrump Crowd Cries Foul When Trump Hits Back
Gateway Pundit ^ | March 24, 2016 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 03/24/2016 9:41:30 AM PDT by bobsunshine

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-291 next last
To: rktman

21 posted on 03/24/2016 9:50:48 AM PDT by jennychase ( Vote Trump Or get Ready for President Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: libbylu
Repeating g the misrepresentation that this is a Cruz PAC is a "dirty campaign trick". Many Trump supporters claim they supported Cruz but he lost them for doing "dirty tricks".

Will they now leave Trump? Or will the situational ethics that permeates the Trump crowd give them license to stay?

22 posted on 03/24/2016 9:50:50 AM PDT by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine
16570e.jpg

.

Ted campaigns with Beck but never disavows any of his comments which means he supports them.

Flashback: Glenn Beck Attacks Melania Trump....

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/03/23/flashback-glenn-beck-attacks-melania-trump-as-lesbian-porno-model/

23 posted on 03/24/2016 9:51:15 AM PDT by dragonblustar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

“Ted Cruz didn’t attack Trump’s wife. Enough with the lies already.”

Lies?? What are you talking about? Cruz clearly attacked Trump’s wife because Der Leader himself said so. It came from an anti-Trump Super PAC that has zero association with Cruz you say? Lies!! Der Leader said it came from Cruz, so it must be so. Cruz denounced the ad you say?? Doesn’t matter!! In a cult, facts don’t matter. When Der Leader says something, everyone MUST fall in line and advance the narrative!!


24 posted on 03/24/2016 9:51:17 AM PDT by lquist1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: libbylu

You gnawed on a lot of window sills as a child, didnja?


25 posted on 03/24/2016 9:51:35 AM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

They can’t help it. They’re not trying to convince Cruz supporters of how bad he is - they’re trying to convince themselves in order to protect their consciences from the knowledge that they’re voting for an awful candidate.


26 posted on 03/24/2016 9:52:02 AM PDT by Echo4C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

“His next career will ether be an ambulance chaser or a used car salesman. Either of which he will fail at.”

Try this as a model:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkr5SOxjihI

I live in the Bay Area. This guy (Chick Gambert) actually did this live on TV! Ted has a role model for his next job!


27 posted on 03/24/2016 9:52:44 AM PDT by vette6387 (Obama can go to hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine

Forget the wives
What about the mistresses?
This week on the news stand
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/celebrity/ted-cruz-sex-scandal-mistresses-cheating-claims/

and before the Cruzers call the Enquirer a rag, remember 3 names: John Edwards, Gary Hart and Jesse Jackson. Don’t think they are prepared to go after Senator Harvard Law unless they can back up their sources


28 posted on 03/24/2016 9:53:14 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine

Dirty tricks from Ted’s campaign manager Jeff Roe, a real POS creep from Missouri who was hired by campaigns so that he couldn’t do bad things to THEM! The fear of dealing with him probably haunted the now-dead Tom Swiech, who committed suicide prior to his run for Governor. Employment of Roe says more about Cruz than you can imagine....


29 posted on 03/24/2016 9:53:17 AM PDT by MHT (,`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought
Gateway is like Trumpbart - so much dirt being thrown
but ask yourself why ?
Next question - when are we going to discuss or debate policy and procedures of the candidates ?
Much ado about nothing of substance !!
30 posted on 03/24/2016 9:53:26 AM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt ( British historian Arnold Toynbee - Civilisations die from suicide, not by murder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine

Did they think this would never become an issue?


31 posted on 03/24/2016 9:53:52 AM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

Ted Cruz didn’t attack Trump’s wife. Enough with the lies already.”

No, it was his buddy Mittens who attacked Trump’s wife. And that opened the door for Trump to bring out some more info on Cruz’s wife which made the Cruzbots stamp their feet and whine cuz their safe place had been invaded.


32 posted on 03/24/2016 9:54:08 AM PDT by angry elephant (Endangered species in Seattle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

Lyin’ Donnie doesn’t have anything else.


33 posted on 03/24/2016 9:54:38 AM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: libbylu

“At the end of the day in any campaign, responsibility starts at the top.”

- Ted Cruz on NBC’s “Meet the Press” 3/13/16


34 posted on 03/24/2016 9:54:51 AM PDT by yuleeyahoo ( Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him. - Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine

Just a question for y’all to consider:

If Trump intended to leave the wives out of it, then how was he able to immediately threaten to “spill the beans” on Heidi Cruz, given that her breakdown had already been exposed by.... somebody.... in the first draw of wives’ blood? Why was Trump IMMEDIATELY ready with apparently either more detail on that “report” or different “smut” on Heidi Cruz, if he was never planning to pull the wives into this?


35 posted on 03/24/2016 9:55:35 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

Hilarious that the man who attacked Fiorina over her looks and Kelly over a photo shoot is upset over his wife’s GQ cover and is all offended. Then attack the wife of a guy who had nothing to do with the ad he is in high dungeon over.

Funny stuff, but Trump loves the gutter.


36 posted on 03/24/2016 9:56:29 AM PDT by Leto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yuleeyahoo

Let me be clear, with cRUz....the buck stops at his PAC....or with manager....or, or....squirrel!


37 posted on 03/24/2016 9:57:03 AM PDT by Jane Long (Go Trump, go! Make America Safe Again :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine

Gotta watch! https://www.instagram.com/p/BDV28yimhQp/


38 posted on 03/24/2016 9:57:03 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: angry elephant

Mittens was dragging Ted all over utah. Mittens also attacked melania. Mittens endorsed Ted specifically for utah. Mittens is tied around cruz’s neck. This was a strategy designed for the poligymist Mormons. You support cruz, you support mittens. Pretty simple.


39 posted on 03/24/2016 9:57:18 AM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine
You know, no matter how many times it is pointed out that the PAC behind the ad is not associated with the Cruz campaign, the Trumpeters just cannot grasp the concept. It doesn't fit with their narrative, so they ignore the facts and keep spreading lies - and then accuse Cruz of being the liar!

The PAC behind the ad is anti-Trump - it will support anyone that can defeat him. In Utah that was Cruz - in another state, it might be Kasich. They really don't care, as long as Trump loses. Here is a statement from their website:

"Make America Awesome is a SuperPAC dedicated to blocking and reversing Donald Trump’s political ascent. We are an independent group, and are not authorized by any presidential candidate or candidate committee. Our focus is on using unconventional and cost-effective tactics, as opposed to stereotypical high-cost, limited-yield methods with the objective of providing maximum donor value."

40 posted on 03/24/2016 9:57:41 AM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-291 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson