Posted on 03/24/2016 9:41:30 AM PDT by bobsunshine
Yea, for his campaign. This PAC is unaffiliated with his campaign.
But you knew that, you just didn’t care.
Very good. Now try to get your arms around the fact that the ad didn't come from Cruz's campaign.
Posting pictures of Trump’s wife is the most interesting thing anyone in the Cruz campaign or PAC’s supporting Cruz has done.
And it’s not like anyone can blackmail Trump over it. We all know his wife was a supermodel and has some photos out there.
Congrats to Trump for the beautiful wife. I’d fly home every night too. And sympathy for Heidi.
“Maybe cruz’s manager should get on the phone and tell these asshats they aren’t helping him and to knock it off. Oh, money. Never mind”
Aside from the fact that such action would be illegal.
I’m sure Rush will pimp for Cruz on this.
Do you think that this type of qualified remark is really going to change anything? Cruz's minions did attack Trump's wife. It took Cruz two days to even pretend that he didn't approve of the attack. Cruz is a the worst kind of slithering Clinton style liberal lawyer. People here are more than smart enough to figure out the nuances of this situation.
it’s called ‘bearing false witness’ - people are disingenuously trying to tie ted to this PAC in an effort to destroy his character- and when it’s pointed out that Ted had nothign to do with it, they double down by insisting he’ shoudl have known about them and hte ad’ (apparently the moment it came out’) and immediately denounced it, and since he didn’t, he’s a ‘slimeball’ evidently-(Of course Donald isn’t a slimeball for lying about Ted accusing him of begin responsible for hte ad, an then threatening Ted’s wife, and now personally retweeting this latest photo of heidi- nope- not donald- he’s just peachy- Mr ‘can-do-no-wrong’ himself)
Gateway pundit used to be a go to site for conservatives- but their blogging lately has not just bordered on ‘bearing false witness’, it has embraced it with passion unfortunately
You seem quite smug about ruining the career of the only Senator who was willing to state on the Senate floor that the leadership had lied to him and his colleagues in order to get the backroom deals they had promised not to do.
I’m sure you must believe that the Senate will be much better when it’s just people who “make better deals” in the backroom while lying to the public and each other...
Agree completely...this was not a Cruz-affiliated PAC...Ted has disowned the stupid add featuring a semi-nude Melania Trump. But, the Oz-like Scarecrows of the Trump brigade refuse to accept this and other facts!
As far as 1,237 delegates is concerned, Ted does have a rough path at the moment. On the other hand, while Trump has a better chance to 1,237, he is by no means assured of getting there before the convention. With most of the remaining delegates allocated on a proportional basis and with a sense that the polls may be tightening, the game is still on for Ted Cruz!
[[Aside from the fact that such action would be illegal.]]
Shhhhh- facts are unwelcome around here- must keep the faux rage alive ya know- ‘illegal’ you say? Pfffft- Ted must be guilty because gateway pundit says so!
What world are you living in? The ad specified to vote for Ted Cruz. Can’t get much more pro-Cruz than saying vote for him.
A day later and after being asked pointed by a reporter if he supported going after candidate spouses.
Only after being called out for not criticizing the add before going after Trump for hitting back.
You are being obstinate. Its a distinction with out a difference. Liz isnt helping. Anyone. Ever.
Maybe because a good leader tries to plan for all conceivable contingencies instead of waiting to blind-sided?
I had to laugh. She thought she had made a point that Trump was in the wrong; but, what she actually did was prove that when you come after him, he ENDS it. So, perhaps when the terrorists come after our country, he will be just as serious in his response.
Why post lies?
Cruz had NOTHING to do with that ad, and Trump knows it!
One is a Harvard Lawyer, one is a soft-porn model/arm candy for a billionaire.
“Aside from the fact that such action would be illegal.” Well, gopE. Kinda like dems light. :>) They haven’t mastered the gamesmanship (or does that need to be gamespersonship) yet.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.