Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woodward: Obama Commenting on Clinton Investigation "Proves We're In A Political Situation Now"
Real Clear Politics ^ | April 10, 2016 | Ian Schwartz

Posted on 04/10/2016 2:48:36 PM PDT by Strac6

Commenting on Hillary Clinton's private server and President Obama weighing in on the Justice Department probe on this week's FOX News Sunday, Watergate journalist Bob Woodward said Obama not only touched a hot stove, "he put his arms around it" with his defense of Hillary Clinton during an ongoing investigation.

BOB WOODWARD: He is anticipating the defense where one of the elements is intent. President Obama said, look this is carelessness. What they're going to be able to say is no crime because there was no intent. If you talk to people in the White House, State Department, Pentagon, they all send these classified messages around. It's the way of doing business. They're argument is, 'Hey, I'm over in the Middle East so I need to do this.' I think this is what we're going to see. (Clinton's claim will be) Big mistake. Carelessness. No intent.

CHRIS WALLACE: What do you think of the idea of a President weighing in like this in the midst of an FBI investigation?

WOODWARD: Well, it proves that we're in a political situation here now. Hillary Clinton is running for president. There have been lots of questions. I think (there are) serious, unanswered questions about the e-mail. But if you can establish there was no intent and there is carelessness in the system --

WALLACE: What about the president weighing in?

WOODWARD: Look, he's a political figure and that's up to him. Karl (Rove) made the critique, I think, you know, always better in a case like this, with a sensitive case, it's a hot stove, don't touch it. He not only touched it, he put his arms around it!

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bobwoodward; districtofcolumbia; washingtoncompost; washingtonpost
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
Proving criminal intent is not necessary in order to prove a crime. Take drunk driving or manslaughter for example.

Criminal negligence is enough to establish the committing of a crime in this case.

1 posted on 04/10/2016 2:48:36 PM PDT by Strac6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Strac6

Should have asked him if he was about to pardon Petraeus.


2 posted on 04/10/2016 2:50:58 PM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strac6

Is “careless” a defense? Is “careless” the new standard for Democrats who are Criminally Negligent?

Hmmm. Gotta remember that one.


3 posted on 04/10/2016 2:51:24 PM PDT by RitaOK ( VIVA CRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strac6

“It wasn’t rape, rape.” Barry Obama

http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2016/04/10/obama-clinton-emails/


4 posted on 04/10/2016 2:51:40 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strac6

If she had restricted info out of the proper channels, intent does not matter!


5 posted on 04/10/2016 2:54:22 PM PDT by Forgotten Amendments (Nessie ... Sasquatch ... The Free Syrian Army ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strac6

The Catch 22 is that if a terror attack had occured because of this “carelessness”, we would have blamed a video and not Hillary yet.

Obama makes it as if she had intent or something bad had happened , he would have done something against her. Liar.


6 posted on 04/10/2016 2:55:07 PM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

No, what is careless is us having encrypted Apple Iphones the FBi cannot break in, not the fact that San Bernadino terrorists were unvetted government workers who should have been forbiden private servers or encrypted phones...


7 posted on 04/10/2016 2:56:54 PM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Strac6
This POTUS is despicable. Absolutely despicable.
8 posted on 04/10/2016 2:58:10 PM PDT by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strac6

I believe that you don’t have to prove intent to prove espionage.

This country has hung Americans for committing espionage.


9 posted on 04/10/2016 2:59:47 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strac6

Gosh.

I remember those communications security briefings I was forced to attend.

They all started out the same way,

“If you disclose our nation’s secrets, intentionally or unintentionally, we will throw you in prison!”

They never said,

“Unless you tell us you really didn’t mean it.”


10 posted on 04/10/2016 3:03:20 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strac6
John Rivers ‏@JohnRiversToo 3 hours ago

The Sunday Shows: Where people who hate me lie to me about yesterday's news.


11 posted on 04/10/2016 3:04:09 PM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie (It's them or us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strac6

It shows that the DOJ under Obama is not going to indict Clinton.


12 posted on 04/10/2016 3:07:06 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strac6

I suppose it matters how the law is written. Is “intent” part of the law?


13 posted on 04/10/2016 3:12:30 PM PDT by ez ("Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is..." - Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


14 posted on 04/10/2016 3:14:11 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Hey Ted, why are you taking one for the RNC/GOPe team, and not ours? Not that we don't know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

“Careless” only works in legal defense if you are a member of the protected class.


15 posted on 04/10/2016 3:15:19 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Ted Cruz was the man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Strac6
Let's say you "intend" to rob a bank of twenty bucks to pay a parking ticket (a misdemeanor), but the teller hands you a $million. Does that make you guilty of only a misdemeanor?

There is no question, in my mind, that Hillary set up the personal email server to avoid FOIA requests for documents. Instead, she certainly exposed top secret information to foreign enemies.

In my view, guilty of treason.

16 posted on 04/10/2016 3:18:45 PM PDT by norwaypinesavage (The Stone Age did not end because we ran out of stones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strac6

Woodward: Nobody can slip one past this guy...

Seriously! He’s just figured this out?

LOL


17 posted on 04/10/2016 3:46:18 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Hey Ted, why are you taking one for the RNC/GOPe team, and not ours? Not that we don't know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strac6

So much for Obama declining to comment regarding ongoing investigations. The two faced weasel...

Mishandling of classified information is a crime regardless of intent. That’s a BS excuse...

Obama has jumped the shark on this felonious act.


18 posted on 04/10/2016 3:47:25 PM PDT by Senator_Blutarski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ez

Not as far as I know. It is just Democrat speak and the press buys it without question.


19 posted on 04/10/2016 3:59:46 PM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

So, Clinton has to win the Presidency in order to stay out of jail. That will make her that much more determined.


20 posted on 04/10/2016 4:00:29 PM PDT by Defiant (The Shills are alive, with the sound of Cruz-ick....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson