Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Proving criminal intent is not necessary in order to prove a crime. Take drunk driving or manslaughter for example.

Criminal negligence is enough to establish the committing of a crime in this case.

1 posted on 04/10/2016 2:48:36 PM PDT by Strac6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: Strac6

Should have asked him if he was about to pardon Petraeus.


2 posted on 04/10/2016 2:50:58 PM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Strac6

Is “careless” a defense? Is “careless” the new standard for Democrats who are Criminally Negligent?

Hmmm. Gotta remember that one.


3 posted on 04/10/2016 2:51:24 PM PDT by RitaOK ( VIVA CRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Strac6

“It wasn’t rape, rape.” Barry Obama

http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2016/04/10/obama-clinton-emails/


4 posted on 04/10/2016 2:51:40 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Strac6

If she had restricted info out of the proper channels, intent does not matter!


5 posted on 04/10/2016 2:54:22 PM PDT by Forgotten Amendments (Nessie ... Sasquatch ... The Free Syrian Army ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Strac6

The Catch 22 is that if a terror attack had occured because of this “carelessness”, we would have blamed a video and not Hillary yet.

Obama makes it as if she had intent or something bad had happened , he would have done something against her. Liar.


6 posted on 04/10/2016 2:55:07 PM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Strac6
This POTUS is despicable. Absolutely despicable.
8 posted on 04/10/2016 2:58:10 PM PDT by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Strac6

I believe that you don’t have to prove intent to prove espionage.

This country has hung Americans for committing espionage.


9 posted on 04/10/2016 2:59:47 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Strac6

Gosh.

I remember those communications security briefings I was forced to attend.

They all started out the same way,

“If you disclose our nation’s secrets, intentionally or unintentionally, we will throw you in prison!”

They never said,

“Unless you tell us you really didn’t mean it.”


10 posted on 04/10/2016 3:03:20 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Strac6
John Rivers ‏@JohnRiversToo 3 hours ago

The Sunday Shows: Where people who hate me lie to me about yesterday's news.


11 posted on 04/10/2016 3:04:09 PM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie (It's them or us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Strac6

It shows that the DOJ under Obama is not going to indict Clinton.


12 posted on 04/10/2016 3:07:06 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Strac6

I suppose it matters how the law is written. Is “intent” part of the law?


13 posted on 04/10/2016 3:12:30 PM PDT by ez ("Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is..." - Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


14 posted on 04/10/2016 3:14:11 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Hey Ted, why are you taking one for the RNC/GOPe team, and not ours? Not that we don't know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Strac6
Let's say you "intend" to rob a bank of twenty bucks to pay a parking ticket (a misdemeanor), but the teller hands you a $million. Does that make you guilty of only a misdemeanor?

There is no question, in my mind, that Hillary set up the personal email server to avoid FOIA requests for documents. Instead, she certainly exposed top secret information to foreign enemies.

In my view, guilty of treason.

16 posted on 04/10/2016 3:18:45 PM PDT by norwaypinesavage (The Stone Age did not end because we ran out of stones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Strac6

Woodward: Nobody can slip one past this guy...

Seriously! He’s just figured this out?

LOL


17 posted on 04/10/2016 3:46:18 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Hey Ted, why are you taking one for the RNC/GOPe team, and not ours? Not that we don't know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Strac6

So much for Obama declining to comment regarding ongoing investigations. The two faced weasel...

Mishandling of classified information is a crime regardless of intent. That’s a BS excuse...

Obama has jumped the shark on this felonious act.


18 posted on 04/10/2016 3:47:25 PM PDT by Senator_Blutarski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Strac6

Carelessness with classified material does not require intent.

Obama is a political a$$, but that is not a revelation.

Woodward is deliberately soft-shoeing this issue, IMO. He, too, is a political a$$.


24 posted on 04/10/2016 4:19:21 PM PDT by MortMan (Let's call the push for amnesty what it is: Pedrophilia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Strac6

President Obama said, look this is carelessness....
yep
and about ten felonies and numerous misdemeanors....SO FAR
sensitive sources, methods and SAP intel was put on a private server, whch was hacked in 2009 and hillary knew full well she was violating the law...
she had asked the NSA to give her an encrypted blackberry, they told her to pisoff..
then she set up the unencrypted server...
She was fully aware fo the law and violated it willingly...
obama and clinton are liars in denial... and obama may be obstructing justice...
have to look at his record communications and unofficial communicaitons with loretta lynch...


30 posted on 04/10/2016 4:41:42 PM PDT by zzwhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Strac6

Woodward needs to retire. Almost everything he said on Fox News Sunday was as factually in error as this. I find it hard to believe he isn’t fully aware of his lies either.


33 posted on 04/10/2016 4:51:00 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Strac6

I had a secret security clearance. If I left the cover page open on a classified package, in an empty room, I could be prosecuted.

Not securing classified information is a crime. Full stop.


34 posted on 04/10/2016 4:55:41 PM PDT by PJammers (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Strac6

As soon as Hillary set up her own server, she demonstrated criminal intent.


35 posted on 04/10/2016 5:04:33 PM PDT by BwanaNdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson