Skip to comments.
Woodward: Obama Commenting on Clinton Investigation "Proves We're In A Political Situation Now"
Real Clear Politics ^
| April 10, 2016
| Ian Schwartz
Posted on 04/10/2016 2:48:36 PM PDT by Strac6
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Proving criminal intent is not necessary in order to prove a crime. Take drunk driving or manslaughter for example.
Criminal negligence is enough to establish the committing of a crime in this case.
1
posted on
04/10/2016 2:48:36 PM PDT
by
Strac6
To: Strac6
Should have asked him if he was about to pardon Petraeus.
2
posted on
04/10/2016 2:50:58 PM PDT
by
allendale
To: Strac6
Is “careless” a defense? Is “careless” the new standard for Democrats who are Criminally Negligent?
Hmmm. Gotta remember that one.
3
posted on
04/10/2016 2:51:24 PM PDT
by
RitaOK
( VIVA CRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming)
To: Strac6
4
posted on
04/10/2016 2:51:40 PM PDT
by
Bubba_Leroy
(The Obamanation Continues)
To: Strac6
If she had restricted info out of the proper channels, intent does not matter!
5
posted on
04/10/2016 2:54:22 PM PDT
by
Forgotten Amendments
(Nessie ... Sasquatch ... The Free Syrian Army ...)
To: Strac6
The Catch 22 is that if a terror attack had occured because of this “carelessness”, we would have blamed a video and not Hillary yet.
Obama makes it as if she had intent or something bad had happened , he would have done something against her. Liar.
6
posted on
04/10/2016 2:55:07 PM PDT
by
JudgemAll
(Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
To: RitaOK
No, what is careless is us having encrypted Apple Iphones the FBi cannot break in, not the fact that San Bernadino terrorists were unvetted government workers who should have been forbiden private servers or encrypted phones...
7
posted on
04/10/2016 2:56:54 PM PDT
by
JudgemAll
(Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
To: Strac6
This POTUS is despicable. Absolutely despicable.
8
posted on
04/10/2016 2:58:10 PM PDT
by
Chgogal
(Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
To: Strac6
I believe that you don’t have to prove intent to prove espionage.
This country has hung Americans for committing espionage.
9
posted on
04/10/2016 2:59:47 PM PDT
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: Strac6
Gosh.
I remember those communications security briefings I was forced to attend.
They all started out the same way,
“If you disclose our nation’s secrets, intentionally or unintentionally, we will throw you in prison!”
They never said,
“Unless you tell us you really didn’t mean it.”
10
posted on
04/10/2016 3:03:20 PM PDT
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: Strac6
John Rivers @JohnRiversToo 3 hours ago
The Sunday Shows: Where people who hate me lie to me about yesterday's news.
To: Strac6
It shows that the DOJ under Obama is not going to indict Clinton.
12
posted on
04/10/2016 3:07:06 PM PDT
by
af_vet_1981
(The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
To: Strac6
I suppose it matters how the law is written. Is “intent” part of the law?
13
posted on
04/10/2016 3:12:30 PM PDT
by
ez
("Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is..." - Milton)
14
posted on
04/10/2016 3:14:11 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Hey Ted, why are you taking one for the RNC/GOPe team, and not ours? Not that we don't know.)
To: RitaOK
“Careless” only works in legal defense if you are a member of the protected class.
To: Strac6
Let's say you "intend" to rob a bank of twenty bucks to pay a parking ticket (a misdemeanor), but the teller hands you a $million. Does that make you guilty of only a misdemeanor?
There is no question, in my mind, that Hillary set up the personal email server to avoid FOIA requests for documents. Instead, she certainly exposed top secret information to foreign enemies.
In my view, guilty of treason.
16
posted on
04/10/2016 3:18:45 PM PDT
by
norwaypinesavage
(The Stone Age did not end because we ran out of stones)
To: Strac6
Woodward: Nobody can slip one past this guy...
Seriously! He’s just figured this out?
LOL
17
posted on
04/10/2016 3:46:18 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Hey Ted, why are you taking one for the RNC/GOPe team, and not ours? Not that we don't know.)
To: Strac6
So much for Obama declining to comment regarding ongoing investigations. The two faced weasel...
Mishandling of classified information is a crime regardless of intent. That’s a BS excuse...
Obama has jumped the shark on this felonious act.
To: ez
Not as far as I know. It is just Democrat speak and the press buys it without question.
To: af_vet_1981
So, Clinton has to win the Presidency in order to stay out of jail. That will make her that much more determined.
20
posted on
04/10/2016 4:00:29 PM PDT
by
Defiant
(The Shills are alive, with the sound of Cruz-ick....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson