still control somewhat by restricting where it can be used, when it can be used, or both. "Somewhat" means they are happy with many missiles slipping into terrorists' hands.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster
Krazy NeoCons at it again.....
2 posted on
04/22/2016 8:26:35 PM PDT by
Paladin2
(Live Free or Die.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
How about one that loops back?
Or maybe one that DETONATES on launch command?
3 posted on
04/22/2016 8:28:11 PM PDT by
gaijin
To: TigerLikesRooster
What could possibly go wrong??
4 posted on
04/22/2016 8:30:58 PM PDT by
ghosthost
To: TigerLikesRooster
This is the kind of crap you get when you let politicians set the rules of engagement and otherwise run a war.
6 posted on
04/22/2016 8:33:05 PM PDT by
econjack
(I'm not bossy...I just know what you should be doing.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
7 posted on
04/22/2016 8:34:03 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Determined to start a World War.
Defense industry profits aren’t high enough?
8 posted on
04/22/2016 8:34:08 PM PDT by
Iron Munro
(Noah: 'When the animals began to pair up by specie and stand in line, I really took notice.')
To: TigerLikesRooster
Morons. Kill islam, not people.
9 posted on
04/22/2016 8:35:26 PM PDT by
soycd
To: TigerLikesRooster
Safer missile?
Make it Nerf.
11 posted on
04/22/2016 8:40:01 PM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(An orange jumpsuit is the new black pantsuit.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Any American government official who provides MANPADS to terrorists should be hung at dawn
We dont need to provide high tech weapons to Jihadi to beat ISIS
All we need to do is have our attack aircraft drop their bombs on ISIS on 95% of their flights instead of the current 35% of the time
12 posted on
04/22/2016 8:40:58 PM PDT by
rdcbn
("If what has happened here is not treason, it is its first cousin." Zell Milleraere)
To: TigerLikesRooster
One that shoots confetti or seltzer water at low flying aircraft.
13 posted on
04/22/2016 8:41:03 PM PDT by
headstamp 2
(Fear is the mind killer.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
This is probably just me, but if you can’t trust someone with an anti-aircraft missile..... forever....... maybe you shouldn’t just give them an anti-aircraft missile. I’m kind of a free thinker that way
14 posted on
04/22/2016 8:42:47 PM PDT by
DesertRhino
("I want those feeble minded asses overthrown,,,)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Madness!
There has been location-aware hardware for some time. One would think the military has been using the technique.
A device knows where it is and won’t function if it is in the wrong place. i.e. You could make a pay-TV decoder device that will only work at a specific address.
Trying to use it in the wrong place can emit an rf signal that is picked up by satellite to alert whoever is interested that someone is playing with something where they shouldn’t be.
This is simple embedded systems work.
Nothing would stop you from placing such functions into military gear.... you could set it so it would NOT function in the CONUS.
It was considered by the FAA to add a restriction on larger drones to make them location-aware and unable to function near any US airport.... easy stuff to do.
17 posted on
04/22/2016 8:49:21 PM PDT by
Bobalu
(Mark Levin can improve any radio show just by not being on it)
To: TigerLikesRooster
BULLCRAP — The safest anti-aircraft missile for Syrian Rebels is THE ONE YOU DON’T GIVE THEM.
18 posted on
04/22/2016 8:53:03 PM PDT by
House Atreides
(TRUMP or CRUZ --- The 1st one to get to 1237 gets the Nomination Brass Ring...PERIOD)
To: TigerLikesRooster
As sophisticated as the terrorists have gotten with computers and cell phones, they should be able to find a work around in, ooooooh, 2 maybe 3 minutes.
19 posted on
04/22/2016 8:54:53 PM PDT by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: TigerLikesRooster
How about background checks and waiting periods. I mean it works so well for guns...
22 posted on
04/22/2016 8:58:08 PM PDT by
PLMerite
(Compromise is Surrender: The Revolution...will not be kind.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Is that like Jocelyn Elders’ “Safer Bullets”
23 posted on
04/22/2016 9:01:25 PM PDT by
dfwgator
To: TigerLikesRooster
Got the very thing
24 posted on
04/22/2016 9:09:25 PM PDT by
Oztrich Boy
("History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce." - Karl Marx)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Forget the insanity of arming Salafist rebels with anything, which is, per se, giving material support to terrorism. But Turkey, KSA, and psychopathic Western intelligence officers should all be charged as accessories to mass murder when the first passenger jet is shot out of the sky. It will be a reoccurring theme and will end int’l air travel as we know it.
To: TigerLikesRooster
Wanted: A Safer Anti-Aircraft Missile for Syrian Rebels How about one that blows up in their face the second they pull the trigger?
27 posted on
04/22/2016 9:17:06 PM PDT by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Canadians can't be President!)
To: TigerLikesRooster
...moderate rebels That would be who exactly? ISIS?
30 posted on
04/22/2016 9:31:31 PM PDT by
Riley
(The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson