Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The Sunday Times of London described Ortel as “one of the finest analysts of financial statements on the planet” in a 2009 story detailing the troubles at AIG.
1 posted on 05/07/2016 8:56:05 AM PDT by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: chopperman

Last month? I’d say they’re about a decade late...


2 posted on 05/07/2016 8:57:27 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
.....amazing what the Clintons have gotten away with for decades using the Clinton Foundation as a front......

EXHIBIT ONE---(hat tip FReeper 9THLIFE) Banks drill their employees into anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist funding.

EVERY banking transaction -- especially by those who are politically involved -- is subject to scrutiny. There is no way -- categorically N.O. way -- in a Patriot-Act world that anyone could have pulled off what is alleged against the Clinton Foundation.

Every suspect transaction will have a report filled out and filed about it. If it involves international transfers and shady characters (think of the latest list of the Friends of Bill) the issues - each and every one -- would be escalated to senior management.

The reports themselves are required to be on file for 5 years. Discussion of such reports -- even their existence -- is strictly controlled and generally forbidden. Yet they remain on record.

It's conceivable that suspicious Clinton activity reports were duly passed on to OCC and whomever else and whomever else has jurisdiction and there they were buried. But some bankers still know about them.

Unless they weren't filed, and that itself is a crime under the applicable law.

=========================================

EXHIBIT TWO---Financial whistleblower Charles Ortel quoted a former managing director of Dillon, Read & Co: "under New York law, tax authorities dont have to show criminal intent to get convictions against foundation officials."

"Authorities need only show that the Clinton Foundation filed materially misleading financial information but kept on fundraising for a myriad of do-good projects."

=========================================

POSTER'S NOTE The legal culpability of a charity consists of soliciting and taking money.... and showing how they spend it.

So if the Clinton Foundation raised money using the US mails and cited a specific "do-good cause" but used the donated money elsewhere, that is considered mail fraud.

REPORT MAIL FRAUD HERE: https://postalinspectors.uspis.gov/contactUs/filecomplaint.aspx

=================================

EXHIBIT THREE---Earlier, Ortel found irregularities of a sufficient magnitude that the Clinton Foundation should be shut down.

Ortel: "if any of the 50 state attorneys general present the evidence to a federal district judge, an injunction would be ordered, shutting down the Clinton Foundation and placing the organization in receivership."

3 posted on 05/07/2016 9:01:06 AM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing can penetrate it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chopperman

The Clinton operates both as a slush fund and as a money laundering operation. You can probably throw in tax evasion, influence peddling and fraud. Not that anything will come of it.


5 posted on 05/07/2016 9:02:15 AM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chopperman; Liz

Thanks for posting. 1/2 of the greatest crime couple in the history of the republic is running for president.


6 posted on 05/07/2016 9:10:45 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chopperman

NSS.....Now let’s look at the Gates Foundation and Buffet Foundations and Rockefeller Foundations and a slew of others


8 posted on 05/07/2016 9:16:37 AM PDT by goodnesswins (Alinsky.....it's what's for dinner: with Cloward Piven for Dessert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chopperman

HRC’s skating is just more proof our gov’t is corrupt.


13 posted on 05/07/2016 9:39:01 AM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chopperman

Of course it’s a fraud—an open in your face criminal venture.


14 posted on 05/07/2016 9:39:16 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chopperman

Clinton Foundation is an upscale car wash; think, Breaking Bad-esque.


19 posted on 05/07/2016 9:57:17 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Trump is the ticket or the republic ends. Vote to end the Establishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chopperman
“It seems like the Clinton Foundation operates as a slush fund for the Clintons,”

Look at most Foundations, and you will likely find that they really operate as slush funds for the insiders.

The tax-free nature allows them to have their investments grow tax-free forever. By paying out a pittance of the yearly income to "charitable purposes", it still costs less than having investment returns be taxable.

You want to know how to erase the deficit? Eliminate the concept of "tax free non-profit". Tax their revenues. Tax the Harvard endowment. Doing so would cripple the left, which relies on employment in "non-profit" organizations, and grants therefrom.

20 posted on 05/07/2016 10:04:14 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chopperman
We've known for a long time, anything “Clint - TON” was Phony.
21 posted on 05/07/2016 10:07:27 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chopperman
Not to worry. Hillary's book sales will keep them going! NOT!

 photo HILLARYS BOOK COVER TOPIC TEXT_zpsvisszjga.jpg

AVAILABLE NOW FREE IN DUMPSTERS EVERYWHERE!

23 posted on 05/07/2016 10:18:45 AM PDT by Dick Bachert (This entire "administration" has been a series of Reischstag Fires. We know how that turned out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chopperman

Even Shitlery has stated that it’s a slush fund

Admitting that the Clinton Foundation paid Sidney Blumingful for his reports to the witch shows there’s no intent to donate funds for do good projects.


25 posted on 05/07/2016 12:02:44 PM PDT by Noob1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chopperman

I suspect the case for violation of the law is clearer on this than on the email scandal. The problem is that it may be easier for Hillary to blame it on someone else.


26 posted on 05/07/2016 12:11:18 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chopperman

Note to Trump’s crew: hammer away on this more than anything, as in this is the summary of the Clinton criminals’ contempt for laws written and unwritten, is easy to understand for most people, source of their continuing power, and most damaging to them.


27 posted on 05/07/2016 2:14:27 PM PDT by OldNewYork (Operation Wetback II, now with computers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chopperman

Ya don’t say...


28 posted on 05/07/2016 2:15:47 PM PDT by uncitizen (PST! Patriots Support Trump - Join Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson