Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Republicans want party more like Trump, not Ryan
Washington Examiner ^ | 5/12/16 | By Paul Bedard

Posted on 05/12/2016 8:12:51 AM PDT by GonzoII

Donald Trump entered his pow wow with House Speaker Paul Ryan Thursday in the driver's seat, emboldened by a new poll that shows voters want the Republican Party to be more like the real estate tycoon, not the 2012 vice presidential nominee.

Rasmussen reported: "Nearly half (47%) of GOP voters now believe the Republican Party should be more like Trump than like Ryan. Thirty-two percent (32%) disagree and say the GOP should be more like Ryan. Seventeen percent (17%) opt for neither."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska; US: New York; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 114th; 2016election; 2016gopprimary; 2016polls; election2016; newyork; paulnehlen; paulryan; polls; ryan; speakerryan; trump; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: NEMDF

If the GOPe had been responsive to its voters’ interests there probably wouldn’t be a Trump candidacy. He is a direct reflection of their frustration with the pathetic failure of the GOP to do anything constructive. The voters are tired of talk; they want action.

Its ironic that the GOPe did nothing to stop Obama yet they seem intent on trying to obstruct Trump and continue denying the will of the voters.


21 posted on 05/12/2016 8:52:41 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Lyin’ Ryan is still playing political games and thinks he can get some concessions out of Trump. Its this kind of arrogance that Republican voters have learned to despise and its why they are sick and tired of the GOPe.


22 posted on 05/12/2016 8:58:19 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: factoryrat

The GOPe’s smokescreen tactics have been exposed. You nailed it.


23 posted on 05/12/2016 9:00:25 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bert
The Founding Fathers were against overseas adventures and for trade protection policies.

Anything counter to that is not "conservative" at all. You mutated the ideology of conservationism to mean getting involved in overseas adventures and for globalization aka free trade.

24 posted on 05/12/2016 9:09:47 AM PDT by Trumpinator ("Are you Batman?" the boy asked. "I am Batman," Trump said. youtube.com/watch?v=HZA9k7WAuiY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

Yes, what you said, I agree 100%.


25 posted on 05/12/2016 9:14:59 AM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

Of course the most obvious explanation is that Ryan is trying to get some type of control over Trump. Trump made his billions by negotiating deals. It is safe to say that Ryan who has never even won a statewide election is way out of his league.

Ryan is helping Trump keep the support of Democrats who will vote for Trump because they think that the Republican party doesn’t want him. He may also be setting an example to ease Cruz supporters on board. If it wasn’t for his past record I would wonder if Trump didn’t ask him to act this way.


26 posted on 05/12/2016 9:16:37 AM PDT by fireman15 (The USA will be toast if the Democrats are able to take the Presidency in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: fireman15

Ryan’s pathetic post-meeting presser was a verbal smokescreen of political rhetoric and obfuscation, which are the only things he is good at. His talk of unity was nothing but a cover for his feeble attempt to appear relevant in the face of mounting disappointment and opposition to him. Ryan’s star is falling and he has few chips left to play. Trump knows he has the upper hand.

Your point about easing Cruz supporters on board is an interesting perspective that I had not thought about. If true, this would be the first glimmer of leadership out of Ryan since he became speaker. Its about time.


27 posted on 05/12/2016 9:31:57 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Trumpinator

No, Thomas Jefferson went to war with the Barbary pirates to enhance American export trade

America was involved in global trade from the beginning

Your assertions are false and a biased misreading of history


28 posted on 05/12/2016 10:04:19 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

“...it’s called ‘The Democratic Party.’”

Democrat.

It’s Democrat party.


29 posted on 05/12/2016 10:15:58 AM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NEMDF

“But what does it take to make the GOPe comprehend this?”

Oh, then “comprehend” completely. It’s just that they simply want to continue the status quo. Newt Gingrich was spot on last night on Hannity. He rattled through the elements of the GOPe and why they are going kicking ans screaming into this election. Ryan personnifies the “organ grinder’s monkeys” whom they control with their money. Someone just posted that in 17 years in the House, he’s only proposed THREE BILLS, and one of them was to name a post office. He’s just like Hillary’s “Senate Career.” They all take our money under false pretenses.


30 posted on 05/12/2016 10:17:10 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gnarledmaw

“Wisconsin’s Senate seat”

I think you meant House seat. Ryan is a Representative, not a Senator.


31 posted on 05/12/2016 10:23:00 AM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Ryan wants Trump to adopt his plan to cut social security, open borders, trade deals where we are taken to the cleaners, cheap labor express, H1b visas, fund Obamacare.

Seems to me the primaries leaders were all outsiders, and Ryan sat this out.


32 posted on 05/12/2016 10:25:32 AM PDT by Zenjitsuman (Y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

So, all of a sudden, the Constitution and limited government don’t matter? Strong national defense and “winning again” are good, too, but not enough by themselves. You need the whole package of preserving the American way of life and the American freedom and constitutional governance.

They still matter to me, and I’m still registered Republican.


33 posted on 05/12/2016 10:50:54 AM PDT by married21 ( As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert; Trumpinator

>>No, Thomas Jefferson went to war with the Barbary pirates to enhance American export trade

Yes. EXPORT trade. He didn’t go to war to protect our right to outsource all of our jobs to a cheaper labor market. We are a continental power. We have resources and we have people and we have our own markets. Other nations need to come to us looking for a deal, not the other way around as we do now.


34 posted on 05/12/2016 11:11:00 AM PDT by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92

we did not export any jobs. That is, we did not export any jobs.

the cost of American labor became too expensive. Labor was subcontracted elsewhere such that the products became salable.

the choice was to buy labor out of the country or close the business.

the concept of exporting jobs is a fallacious and in some cases malicious myth


35 posted on 05/12/2016 11:16:53 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: bert
Export is not imports. I did not claim to be against global trade - that is a stupid assumption on your part. Imports were subject to tariffs under Alexander Hamilton's program.

Tariff Act of 1789: "Whereas it is necessary for that support of government, for the discharge of the debts of the United States, and the encouragement and protection of manufactures, that duties be laid on goods, wares and merchandise:"

36 posted on 05/12/2016 11:24:24 AM PDT by Trumpinator ("Are you Batman?" the boy asked. "I am Batman," Trump said. youtube.com/watch?v=HZA9k7WAuiY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92; bert
Yes. EXPORT trade.

I wrote the same before I saw your response. Also, he tried to spin it as if I stated the Founding Fathers were against global trade as if people who advocate for "America First" don't want trade with the world.

I repeat - free trade aka globalization is a mutation on conservative ideology and is in fact an alien graft onto it.

37 posted on 05/12/2016 11:28:04 AM PDT by Trumpinator ("Are you Batman?" the boy asked. "I am Batman," Trump said. youtube.com/watch?v=HZA9k7WAuiY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Trumpinator

Tariffs are archaic relics that would not accomplish the intended results

The income tax has proven to be a more acceptable and in fact satisfactory method for financing the government


38 posted on 05/12/2016 11:30:02 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....Opabinia can teach us a lot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: bert
we did not export any jobs. That is, we did not export any jobs. the cost of American labor became too expensive. Labor was subcontracted elsewhere such that the products became salable. the choice was to buy labor out of the country or close the business. the concept of exporting jobs is a fallacious and in some cases malicious myth

The myth is you think you are a Conservative. You and your Free Trading ilk are being push into the dustbin of history where your type belongs. Bye.

Go Trump go!

39 posted on 05/12/2016 11:31:56 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: bert

>>the cost of American labor became too expensive. Labor was subcontracted elsewhere such that the products became salable.

If you subscribe to the idea that all money must go to business owners, then you are correct. If you believe in a free nation where it is respectable to work for a living, then you are denying people’s right to fair employment.

If you think that all money should go to business owners, then don’t get mad when everyone else votes for the Socialist.

Globalism is good in moderation. We took it too far and the backlash is Obama and Bernie. You created a generation with no hope of having a career and you wonder why they are so short-sighted. As the businessman says when he lays off his workers, “it’s not personal. It’s just business.” Voting for a living has become the only stable career in America.


40 posted on 05/12/2016 11:32:20 AM PDT by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson