Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mister 1,237: North Dakota delegate puts Trump over the top (Thanks ND John)
US news ^ | May 26, 2016 | Stephen Ohlemacher

Posted on 05/26/2016 11:28:26 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

John Trandem wanted to be the delegate who would put Donald Trump over the top, giving him enough delegates to clinch the Republican presidential nomination.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: North Dakota
KEYWORDS: delegateunbound; nominee; northdakota; trump; trump2016; uncruzdelegate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
The IRONY of NORTH DAKOTA giving Donald Trump the win is so SWEET giving that Cruz made a huge effort to wrangle the ND delegates.

His father went to ND last September, targeting a state that does not hold a primary or a caucus. They made sure Cruz delegates were the majority to choose from in Fargo.

The irony of it being - John Trandem, an unbound delegate- is also sweet. Ted Cruz had included several unbound delegates as committed to Cruz to make ND 'appear' as his win.

Politico's reported that not all the unbound delegates listed on the Cruz Campaign Victory were committed to supporting him. Many stated their support was soft or conditional.

Yet Cruz was counting all these people as his delegates and distributed the list to the press, tricking the press into declaring Cruz as the big winner of North Dakota.

So much for the TeamCruz strategy of assumed winning and voter-less wins.

"Mister 1237" = John Trandem is a small business owner from Fargo, North Dakota.

As a Trump supporter, John didn't want to commit until they had 1236 delegates.

Trandem knew Trump was two delegates short, so he passed his phone to state Rep. Ben Koppleman.

And once Ben committed and became 1236, John Trandem officially became Mister 1237.

Even though technically, no Republican candidate could win North Dakota, Cruz had declared victory referring to his 'long grass-roots" campaign.

From GreenPapers North Dakota page:

April 3-7:

"Cruz allies prevail in North Dakota -CNN. "North Dakota Republicans selected 25 national delegates and, of those, 18 were on a list of preferred delegates that Cruz circulated"

Cruz: "I'm thrilled to have the vote of confidence of Republican voters in North Dakota who delivered such a resounding victory today,"

"As I met them over the weekend, ND Republicans recognized that I am the only candidate who can move this country forward by protecting freedom and liberty.

Whether we defeat Donald Trump before the convention or at it, I'm energized to have the support of the vast majority of ND delegates."

1 posted on 05/26/2016 11:28:26 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

North Dakota almost nominated Reagan in 1976, too. Details on my Freeper page.


2 posted on 05/26/2016 11:35:06 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

What a jerk that needs 15 minutes of fame


3 posted on 05/26/2016 11:35:09 AM PDT by stocksthatgoup (GOPe/MSM - "When we want your opinion, we will give it to youGo to trumps websites look a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

I think its ironic because the RNC rules committee guy who kept saying the party chooses the nominee...not the voters...is from North Dakota.


4 posted on 05/26/2016 11:35:31 AM PDT by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

Search is broken today, huh?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-gop/3434188/posts


5 posted on 05/26/2016 11:35:52 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

Once more, New Jersey’s primary votes are rendered irrelevant because they’re in June instead of April or May.

I got my sample ballot in the mail today, which shows the layout of the machine and location of the parties and candidates. One curious thing, though. On the Republican section there is a check box and short instruction for a write-in vote on the presidential line. It is missing from the Democrat section. Hmmm...


6 posted on 05/26/2016 11:38:05 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup

Cruz said that back in April, after he thought he had wrangled the majority of delegates and he added some names to make the win look bigger.

He waited for CNN to declare him the winner, then put out his thank you statement.

It was a dirty trick and it worked. I thought Cruz owned the N. Dakota delegation.

Little did we know his victory list was a farce. He added at least 3 other names.


7 posted on 05/26/2016 11:45:13 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

It was actually a CO delegate that put Trump over the top.

You’ll remember the state party managed to get a pro-Cruz slate elected here.

An unbound female delegate was one of the last to go to Trump, giving him a majority.

So much for stealing a caucus state!


8 posted on 05/26/2016 11:48:18 AM PDT by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NELSON111

The ‘rules guru’ from Dakota believes the delegates should decide the nominee, entirely. Curley says all delegates should be unbound and there is no reason to hold primary elections.

This is still a problem that could arise for Trump. The rules committee is being stacked with Cruz delegates. Unlike, this delegate, these people will be unequivocally Cruz die-hards and scheming to rewrite the nomination rules for 2016 and beyond.


9 posted on 05/26/2016 11:49:49 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

New Jersey is not irrelevant and Trump needs a huge show of support.

1. Break the record for the biggest ever RNC primary vote.

2. Demonstrate the NJ delegate sweep is 100% supported by the vote %.

3. Mobilize people to vote & volunteer in the November election.

4, It’s Trump’s next-door neighbor and it’s the neighborly thing.


10 posted on 05/26/2016 11:54:42 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

I see it as a form of sweet revenge for their state being cheated out of the peoples right to vote.

Was the Colorado woman just by chance, or was she trying to put Trump over the top like this guy. Miss 1237 or Mrs.1237.


11 posted on 05/26/2016 11:59:36 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

Poetic justice that Curly Haugland’s state put The Donald over the top.


12 posted on 05/26/2016 12:17:11 PM PDT by Zack Attack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zack Attack

LoL at that goof ball.


13 posted on 05/26/2016 12:28:06 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

Works for me!


14 posted on 05/26/2016 12:28:20 PM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Zack Attack

I’ll bet ‘ol Curley has him disqualified.


15 posted on 05/26/2016 12:55:37 PM PDT by damper99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: damper99

Disqualified? Exactly!

That is their final game plan at the convention.

1. The rules committee changes the rules to either allow ‘votes of conscious’ and disregards the 1st vote rule bound to the candidate. Or they make a new rule to impede Trump’s formal nomination.

2. The rules committee seeks to disqualify entire state delegations or certain individual delegates based on technicalities.


16 posted on 05/26/2016 1:08:47 PM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

Not going to happen.

Trump will have more than enough delegates to win on the first ballot.

If it was a contested convention, all bets would have been off.

The GOP is not going to commit political suicide by dumping someone who won the nomination fair and square.

And rank and file Republicans are closing ranks behind Trump.


17 posted on 05/26/2016 1:21:45 PM PDT by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

Historic moment. He will never forget it for the rest of his life. Thanks, John!

18 posted on 05/26/2016 1:35:26 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. --George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup

You mean Ted Cruz, right?


19 posted on 05/26/2016 1:57:47 PM PDT by freepersup (Patrolling the waters off Free Republic one dhow at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
Even though technically, no Republican candidate could win North Dakota

That part is not true. The Republicans have won every presidential election there since 1964.

20 posted on 05/26/2016 2:08:05 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (Delegates So Far: Trump (1,238); Cruz (559); Rubio (165); Kasich (161)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson