Skip to comments.
Ginsburg: Having only 8 justices hamstrings Supreme Court
Associated Press ^
| May 26, 2016 6:06 PM EDT
| Michael Vertanen
Posted on 05/26/2016 5:53:01 PM PDT by Olog-hai
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
To: smokingfrog
This old leftist hag wakes up enough to spew this crapola. Resign you complete idiot loser...resign now.
21
posted on
05/26/2016 6:21:58 PM PDT
by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
To: Olog-hai
maybe another one can get knocked off?...to make it a nice 7?
22
posted on
05/26/2016 6:22:46 PM PDT
by
cherry
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
23
posted on
05/26/2016 6:23:03 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(I'll tell you what's wrong with society -- no one drinks from the skulls of their enemies anymore.)
To: Bryanw92
Actually the courts where never intended to be the arbiter of constitutionality. It was the poorly decided case of Marbury VS Madison that constituted the massive power grab of the courts.
24
posted on
05/26/2016 6:23:22 PM PDT
by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: Olog-hai
Then RESIGN, ma’am. See how it works with 7 justices, if having 8 on the court doesn’t suit you.
To: Olog-hai
I wonder how happy Ruth Buzzy will be with Trump’s new justice? LOL!
26
posted on
05/26/2016 6:31:56 PM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: Olog-hai
27
posted on
05/26/2016 6:33:14 PM PDT
by
SoFloFreeper
((Just say no to HRC))
To: Olog-hai
If we’d known it was this easy, we would have invited YOU on a hunting trip!
28
posted on
05/26/2016 6:34:34 PM PDT
by
Da Bilge Troll
(Defeatism is not a winning strategy!)
To: Olog-hai
if she would quit, there would be an odd number
29
posted on
05/26/2016 6:36:06 PM PDT
by
Thibodeaux
(leading from behind is following)
To: Olog-hai
Who woke her up? And why?
30
posted on
05/26/2016 6:41:48 PM PDT
by
VerySadAmerican
(The day Trump is sworn in I'm changing my screen name.)
To: Olog-hai; Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; ...
FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
31
posted on
05/26/2016 6:47:29 PM PDT
by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
To: Olog-hai
Then quit you old troll!!!
To: Olog-hai
Yeah, "8".
To: Olog-hai
I have no doubt that there are people putting a tremendous amount of pressure to put in another SCOTUS Justice...and I pray that this will be held off until Trump is in office before it is done...
34
posted on
05/26/2016 6:57:54 PM PDT
by
HarleyLady27
('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump; Trump; Trump; Trump; 100%)
To: Olog-hai
And should a Supreme court Justice be interfering with politics between the Executive and the legistlative branches of government?
I don’t think so.
35
posted on
05/26/2016 7:05:11 PM PDT
by
Fhios
(Going Donald Trump is as close to going John Galt as we'll get.)
To: Olog-hai
Hey Ruth...I’ve got an idea... Why don’t you fookin resign...
To: Olog-hai
37
posted on
05/26/2016 7:16:04 PM PDT
by
Texas Fossil
((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
To: Olog-hai
Having 4 Constitution hating globalists on it has been a disaster, Ginsberg, you sick freak. She never saw a eugenics or Malthusian program she didn’t love.
38
posted on
05/26/2016 7:20:47 PM PDT
by
Seruzawa
(If you agree with the French raise your hand. If you are French raise both hands)
To: Olog-hai
"I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012," Justice Darth Vader Ginsburg
39
posted on
05/26/2016 7:25:47 PM PDT
by
GregoTX
To: Olog-hai
True. People like her really are evil to biblical proportions.
40
posted on
05/26/2016 7:35:07 PM PDT
by
Bullish
(Face it, insanity is just not presidential.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson