Skip to comments.
Gingrich: Trump's attacks on judge 'unacceptable'
The Hill ^
| June 4, 2016
| Evelyn Rupert
Posted on 06/04/2016 7:30:13 PM PDT by maggief
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
1
posted on
06/04/2016 7:30:13 PM PDT
by
maggief
To: maggief
But a “wise Latina” does bring a different perspective to justice, right?
2
posted on
06/04/2016 7:32:40 PM PDT
by
LS
("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
To: maggief
So was sitting on that couch with nurse rachett aka pelosi
3
posted on
06/04/2016 7:32:46 PM PDT
by
al baby
(Hi Mom yes I know john 3:16)
To: maggief
Alberto Gonzalez, the first HISPANIC ATTORNEY GENERAL in US history, says otherwise.
4
posted on
06/04/2016 7:33:35 PM PDT
by
SoFloFreeper
((Just say no to HRC))
To: maggief
The Code of Conduct for United States Judges, which states explicitly that Canon 2: A Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in All Activities. It isnt necessary that the judge is actually behaving with impropriety. It is sufficient that his conduct appears improper, something that impairs confidence in the judiciary as a whole, regardless of the judges actual motives and conduct... Member of La Raza [The Race ]
To: maggief
Here’s why Newt causes some to question his being the VP nod. You just never know when he’s going to say something like this.
Alberto Gonzoles has said that it is entirely appropriate for Trump to question the judge’s heritage, connections, etc. If the judge is a member of LaRaza (or whatever it’s called) then he should not be on this case.
To: maggief
Meet shot his mouth off without knowing the facts. Scratch him from the VP list, if he was ever on it.
7
posted on
06/04/2016 7:34:02 PM PDT
by
Carry me back
(Cut the feds by 90%9)
To: maggief
I guess Curiel being a member of La RAZA ( the race) and working on their legal team pro -bono does not give him a bias Newt?
you are wrong
Donald is right and you would have been an excellent VP but probably just pooched your shot...so good luck
To: maggief
Dear Newt. Judge Curiel is associated with La Raza. THAT makes the difference. His sympathies are not with his country of birth if he’s with La Raza. He needs recuse himself, and let another judge handle the case.
9
posted on
06/04/2016 7:34:07 PM PDT
by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists Call 'em what you will, they all have fairies livin' in their trees.)
To: LS
10
posted on
06/04/2016 7:34:59 PM PDT
by
maggief
To: maggief
Alberto Gonzalez disagrees with Gingrich.
Did Trump mention the judge’s LA raza connection at the same time as the Mexican comment ?
11
posted on
06/04/2016 7:35:41 PM PDT
by
xzins
( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
To: maggief
There’s definitely some shenanigans going on there with the unredacted stuff.
Mind you though, this is not going to help Trump, and a good counter of scummy actions by the opposition will be needed, even so, it’s disheartening.
12
posted on
06/04/2016 7:35:54 PM PDT
by
BlackAdderess
(A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen... -Emerson)
To: JudyinCanada
The judge is a La Raza supporter, and also an illegal supporter. Newt needs to get his facts straight!
13
posted on
06/04/2016 7:36:49 PM PDT
by
Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
(Don't touch that thing Don't let anybody touch that thing!I'm a Doctor and I won't touch that thing!)
To: lexington minuteman 1775
What we commonly call La Raza is formally the National Council of La Raza.
Curiel is a member of a “La Raza” attorneys’ association.
Depending on who you ask, yes they are or no they are not connected.
14
posted on
06/04/2016 7:37:13 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: maggief
Newt turning on Trump. Maybe found out he’s not going to be VP. I see it as a clear conflict of interest.
15
posted on
06/04/2016 7:37:56 PM PDT
by
jersey117
(ut)
To: maggief
16
posted on
06/04/2016 7:38:19 PM PDT
by
Zionist Conspirator
(HaShem first! Anything else is idolatry, a violation of the very first commandment!)
To: maggief
well Trump did say he wouldn’t have a problem with the judge’s judgment if the judge sided with him (Trump). :-)
To: Carry me back
See, this is why I don’t post much. All the good Shiite is already posted!
18
posted on
06/04/2016 7:40:48 PM PDT
by
going hot
(Happiness is a Momma deuce)
To: Carry me back
Maybe Newt recently learned he’s NOT on the list.
19
posted on
06/04/2016 7:41:41 PM PDT
by
Tucker39
(Welcome to America! Now speak English; and keep to the right....In driving, in Faith, and politics.)
To: maggief
Yeah, well it's not like you've always made the best political decisions either now is it Newt?
20
posted on
06/04/2016 7:42:41 PM PDT
by
Bullish
(Face it, insanity is just not presidential.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson