String Theory Co-Founder: Sub-Atomic Particles Are Evidence the Universe Was Created

Dr. Michio Kaku, a theoretical physicist at the City College of New York (CUNY) and co-founder of String Field Theory, says theoretical particles known as “primitive semi-radius tachyons” are physical evidence that the universe was created by a higher intelligence.

After analyzing the behavior of these sub-atomic particles - which can move faster than the speed of light and have the ability to “unstick” space and matter – using technology created in 2005, Kaku concluded that the universe is a “Matrix” governed by laws and principles that could only have been designed by an intelligent being.

“I have concluded that we are in a world made by rules created by an intelligence. Believe me, everything that we call chance today won’t make sense anymore,” Kaku said, according to an article published in the Geophilosophical Association of Anthropological and Cultural Studies.

“To me it is clear that we exist in a plan which is governed by rules that were created, shaped by a universal intelligence and not by chance.”

“The final solution resolution could be that God is a mathematician,” Kaku, author of The Future of the Mind: The Scientific Quest to Understand, Enhance, and Empower the Mind, said in a 2013 Big Think video posted on YouTube.

“The mind of God, we believe, is cosmic music, the music of strings resonating through 11-dimensional hyperspace.”

String Theory “revolutionized” mathematics and physics by demonstrating a “super symmetry” in the universe. Kaku said it also explains gaps in the Big Bang theory.

“First of all, the Big Bang wasn’t very big. Second of all, there was no bang. Third, Big Bang Theory doesn’t tell you what banged, when it banged, how it banged. It just said it did bang. So the Big Bang theory in some sense is a total misnomer,” the well-known physicist said in 2015.

“We need a theory that goes before the Big Bang, and that’s String Theory. String Theory says that perhaps two universes collided to create our universe, or maybe our universe is butted from another universe leaving an umbilical cord….

“Some people believe that maybe, just maybe, we have detected evidence of that umbilical cord.”

A living being has an independent identity, in my view of things. In other words, the Great I Am here creates lesser beings but with each having it’s own sense of “I am”...a condition of “beinghood”. God is the ultimate, eternal “Being”.

Absolutely. On my personal reflections, we humans are participations in ultimate, eternal Being, our source and our sustainer. Philosophers love to quibble about the distinction between "being" and "existence." "Life" encompasses both meanings. Yet to me, it's simple: All living creatures "exist" -- that is, are alive. Even the inanimate world can be said to "exist" in some sense.

Yet of all the creatures, man is the only one who "IS" uniquely in himself. Man possesses, not only soul, but nous, a gift of God. Via this means, he is capable of developing self-consciousness, which is the very basis of human reason and intelligence. It also guides the mortal course of the person, and makes him responsible for the choices he makes, which are ultimately subject to divine judgement.

This idea goes far, far back into the ancient world. As far as I know, Plato was the first to isolate and qualify nous, seeing it as having only two possible loci (for lack of a better word), divine and human.

Evidently, Plato believed God was perfectly unintelligible to the human mind. He is the God "Beyond," not only "beyond" the physical cosmos which he caused, but also utterly beyond human comprehension. In principle. But that doesn't mean divine-human communication is impossible. Indeed, it seems Socrates swore by it -- he "felt" the divine "pulls" and responded....

Funny thing is, Plato thought man was the eikon or "image" of the Cosmos. That is, he conceived the entire hierarchy of being was recapitulated in man himself, from the highest level, divine Nous, to human nous, to feeling/passion, through the biological, vegetative, and inorganic levels, finally bottoming out in the Apeiron, the fathomless Depth of all that "exists," out of which everything physical comes, and back into which everything physical goes in due course of time.

According to Anaximander, the Apeiron is the unlimited, indefinite, unbounded. It is the 'unlimited' source of all particular things. Because it transcends all limits, it is in principle undefinable.

So Plato's great hierarchy of Being puts the divine at the summit, and the divine at its base. Both these "poles" are unknowable by man directly. But man lives his life "in between" these two poles....

Notwithstanding the mythical quality here, flashes of the Second Law of Thermodynamics and quantum mechanics always seem to come to my mind at this point.... But I digress.

I wanted to tell you where the great second-century A.D. philosopher Justin Martyr took the Platonic insights. He'd been an avid student of philosophy from his youth, had been through the different philosophical schools of the day, and found them wanting. Eventually, he found Plato's school, which was still going through successors. Then he found Christianity. It was Justin who first realized that Christ was not only the fulfillment of the Old Testament prophets, but He was also the fulfillment of classical philosophy.

Anyhoot, Justin Martyr would become the greatest evangelist of the Logos in the second century. He died a martyr for his faith. He has been sainted by the Roman Catholic Church, the Anglican Church, and the Eastern Orthodox Church.

In closing, there's a profound difference between Plato's cosmology and Christianity. In Plato, man is the complete image of the Cosmos. In Christianity, man is made in the image of God Himself. Which probably explains where he got his nous from.

Thank you so much for writing, dear Brother xzins!

'Scientists' keep telling us that, but then I see the Pyramids and Vast Underground CIties built before the dawn of the 'Enlightenment'.

Indeed, the great pyramids stagger the imagination. The Great Pyramid of Cheops reportedly dates back to c. 2560–2540 BC. HOW is was constructed is still a mystery. Presumably the tools of the time were pretty primitive. It obviously was a labor-intensive enterprise, likely from forced labor or slaves.

Yet according to some myths from ancient Mesopotamia, the pyramids were built by "extraterrestrials," who also "seeded" man on this planet in the beginning. These extra-cosmic beings were regarded as "the gods." Later, certain pharaohs conscripted the already-long-extant pyramids into service as their burial chambers.

Or at least that is one myth. In recent times, Erik von Danneken has revived it, in his book The Chariots of the Gods. Most people regard this as science fiction nowadays.

So I can't explain anything about the pyramids. I'm just amazed they're there, and have lasted so long. What I find even more astonishing is the Great Sphynx. It is said to be much older than the Great pyramids themselves. Unfortunately, it appears to be weathering alarmingly in recent times.

Assuming the pyramids and the Sphynx were fashioned by human hands, the pyramids are a totally amazing construction feat that testifies to the technical, organizational abilities of the human mind. The Sphynx is even more than that. It is a symbolization of the deep meaning of a form of ancient wisdom that is being captured for the ages in stone. It probably refers to a mystery cult of some kind.

Scientists don't deal in mystery cults, of course. Myth is not their cup of tea.

On the other hand, a student of culture and history will notice that human kind have been continually preoccupied with discerning meaning behind the brute facts of Nature since the beginning of human records. This seems to be a fact of human nature that does not change.

Again, more questions than answers!!!

Thanks for writing, UCANSEE2.

Back to the basic article, it seems to me that the Creator cannot be bound by the speed of light since it is a created thing. Therefore, it would seem to me that messengers of God also cannot be bound by the speed of light, since they are sent on their way by God, but are also created beings. Therefore, I’m inclined to think that the speed of light might be a difficult barrier but not an impossible one.

Dear Brother xzins, I entirely agree with your assessment.

Don't let the tachyons get you down! We humans are mainly space and time bound in 4D. In that frame of reference, time has a maximum speed limit of C, the speed of light. It is expected, however, that tachyons move at a rate faster than C. In which case, it is probably not possible to observe them directly; for they operate in a time order outside of human awareness.

Then again, no one has ever "seen" a quark, though the existence of quarks is pretty much validated.

I guess the moral of the story might be some things cannot be seen directly, but only in their effects. (c.f. Romans 1:20)

In any case, God, the Creator of Time, cannot be subject to Time at all. God is timeless, eternal. The Creator utterly transcends that which He has created.

It seems to me the messengers of God have the ability to move at superluminal speeds. And not only that, but can instantaneously transport a human to a "different location" and then back again....

But I can't explain this.

Thanks for writing, dear Brother!

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.