Posted on 06/20/2016 6:11:57 AM PDT by xzins
Dr. Michio Kaku, a theoretical physicist at the City College of New York (CUNY) and co-founder of String Field Theory, says theoretical particles known as “primitive semi-radius tachyons” are physical evidence that the universe was created by a higher intelligence.
After analyzing the behavior of these sub-atomic particles - which can move faster than the speed of light and have the ability to “unstick” space and matter – using technology created in 2005, Kaku concluded that the universe is a “Matrix” governed by laws and principles that could only have been designed by an intelligent being.
“I have concluded that we are in a world made by rules created by an intelligence. Believe me, everything that we call chance today won’t make sense anymore,” Kaku said, according to an article published in the Geophilosophical Association of Anthropological and Cultural Studies.
“To me it is clear that we exist in a plan which is governed by rules that were created, shaped by a universal intelligence and not by chance.”
“The final solution resolution could be that God is a mathematician,” Kaku, author of The Future of the Mind: The Scientific Quest to Understand, Enhance, and Empower the Mind, said in a 2013 Big Think video posted on YouTube.
“The mind of God, we believe, is cosmic music, the music of strings resonating through 11-dimensional hyperspace.”
String Theory “revolutionized” mathematics and physics by demonstrating a “super symmetry” in the universe. Kaku said it also explains gaps in the Big Bang theory.
“First of all, the Big Bang wasn’t very big. Second of all, there was no bang. Third, Big Bang Theory doesn’t tell you what banged, when it banged, how it banged. It just said it did bang. So the Big Bang theory in some sense is a total misnomer,” the well-known physicist said in 2015.
“We need a theory that goes before the Big Bang, and that’s String Theory. String Theory says that perhaps two universes collided to create our universe, or maybe our universe is butted from another universe leaving an umbilical cord….
“Some people believe that maybe, just maybe, we have detected evidence of that umbilical cord.”
It sounds like Kaku is a learned, educated man. He does have a professorship at a well known university. Also, if I recall correctly, black holes are still theoretical but they get talked about all the time as the launching point for derivative ideas.
Well and truly stated. There are tremendous hints on the nature of the Universe found in the Bible. But to see them one must believe God IS, that He has given The Word, and that He rewards those who diligently seek Him. Wouldn't it be an interesting evening to hear Kaku's explanation of Daniel Chapter five, 2 Kings 2:17, Jesus leaving the rock tomb without rolling away the stone, Philip caught away after baptizing the Ethiopian, or the scene in the Upper Room following Jesus's resurrection, or ... well, you get the gist.
The Bible records events supporting the notion of parallel realms, Daniel 5, 2Kings 2:17, to name but two.
hegel’s god arises out of the self-awareness of beings, thus Hegel’s god is a creation, contradicting Hegel’s first principle.
Mathematics is the language of science.
> Dr. Kaku has a wonderful way of making multi-verse descriptions that our little brains have a hard time getting around.
That’s because his theories are nonsense with no tie to the physical world. One can make up any sort of fantasy one pleases with the tools of mathematics divorced from real-world accountability, which unfortunately describes much of institutional physics departments these days.
http://www.signatureinthecell.com/
It seems that our DNA code is fantastically complicated, more so than originally conceived.
DNA aside, life is more complex that envisioned by Darwin. Darwin believed in protoplasm, akin to some living jelly. We now know that a living cell is very complex. It has been said that a cell is more complex than a nuclear submarine, advanced as man's most complex created entity.
Given all this complexity, it seems there was not enough time for life to arise and evolve through mutation and natural selection.
I suspect one reason some people advance the idea that there is an infinite number of universes is to give evolution a chance. (To paraphrase John Lennon, “All I am saying is give evolution a chance”).
Nature's Destiny, by Michael Denton, suggest that evolution, and presumably man, was the plan all along.
One author made the claim that simple bacteria have more DNA than any of us. (I've found this hard to confirm or disconfirm.) The hint is that simple bacteria had it all from the start. DNA for a horse, a shark, a dinosaur, a tree, a human. Then natural selection can down-select to fill an evolutionary niche..
I suspect that we will never be able to establish a natural or supernatural origin completely beyond all doubt. My theological understanding is that the universe was created so that you could choose. There will always be mixed evidence. Most people will emphasize some evidence, and de-emphasize other evidence, to suit their desired outcome..
Supposedly, time and space started with the Big Bang. So there was no “before” the Big Bang.
It’s as though there was nothing. Let there be light. There was something.
Well, maybe they couldn’t see it because light had not been invented yet........................
“First of all, the Big Bang wasn’t very big.”
That is hard for me to understand. Starting with a bomb that is smaller than an peach, exploding into billions of galaxies each with billions of stars, each star incredibly massive, all fleeing each other like particles after an explosion, seems like a pretty big bang to me.
I don’t know if it was ‘big’ or ‘little’; Kaku seems to think it wasn’t very ‘big’; but he’s a scientist and thinks in those terms.
I just don’t believe it could possibly have been the beginning of all that IS.
Eternity is kind of hard to wrap one’s brain around - and I don’t think ‘the guy upstairs’ expects us to be able to:
” ‘For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways,’ declares the LORD.”
That seems to intimate something so far beyond our ken as human beings that the approach has to be through more than mere human intellect.
-JT
Hegel, Kant, and Schopenhaur (especially) are discussed in chapter 9 of Dinesh D’Souza’s book Life After Death the Evidence.
And then, there is quantum mechanics.
It takes a while for me, and apparently “the world,” to figure out the implications, philosophical and otherwise, of a post-Newtonian world.
She Bang She Bang!!!!
“Supposedly, time and space started with the Big Bang.”
Without time, there can be no change, so if time did not exist before the Big Bang, then we would still be in the state that we were in before the Big Bang, since nothing could ever change from that state.
That’s just one of the reasons that the Big Bang is a self-contradictory theory.
She-boom, She-boom
Lalalalalalalalalalala
She-boom, She-boom
Intelligent design by God or aliens at least cuts it to 50/50 though. That is a big step toward proving a creator God to me.
Thank you for the great post.
It is very controversial, when a mathematical physicist -- from CUNY no less, a rather progressive institution -- puts the necessity of divine intelligence into the scientific cosmological picture.
Michio Kaku is among other things a regular Fox News contributor. If anything, every time he's been on Fox he gives the impression that he believes in the omnicompetence of science. It must have taken real guts for him to put God back into the picture....
Of course, it was "science" that took Him out of it in the first place.
This short piece provides little detail WRT Kaku's findings. I'd be interested in learning more.
I'm reading a book right now called The Theory of Nothing, by theoretical physicist Russell K. Standish, that makes the claim that black holes may be incubators of new universes.
Anyhoot, in reply to the Gospel of John 1:1, Standish says,
In the beginning there was Nothing, not even a beginning! From out of this Nothing, emerged everything we see around us today.A rather startling claim IMHO. It looks like Professor Kaku might dispute this claim. But I have no details of Kaku's argument....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.