Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ChristianMingle loses lawsuit, must now include gay singles
Washington Times ^ | July 1, 2016 | Jessica Chasmar

Posted on 07/01/2016 2:18:59 PM PDT by rdl6989

ChristianMingle.com, an online dating service for Christian singles, must start allowing people to seek out same-sex relationships under a judge-approved settlement. ChristianMingle only required new users to specify whether they’re a man seeking a woman or a woman seeking a man. Two gay men filed class-actions claims against the site’s owner, California-based Spark Networks Inc., claiming that the site’s limited options violated California’s anti-discrimination law, The Wall Street Journal reported. State law requires businesses to offer “full and equal” accommodations and services to people regardless of their sexual orientation.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: california; christianmingle; christianminglecom; gaystappo; homosexualagenda; idiocy; liberalfascism; persecution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: rdl6989

Easy solution. Move the headquarters out of Californication.


61 posted on 07/01/2016 3:33:26 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Socialism is always just one or a thousand or a million more murders away from utopia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

I say open up a serial killer dating website and let the LGBT’s place all the ads they want to there for free.../s


62 posted on 07/01/2016 3:34:40 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

The purpose is to force Christians to choose between their faith and their job.


63 posted on 07/01/2016 3:38:35 PM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989; All
Note that when the states ratified the 14th Amendment (14A), they prohibited themselves from abridging personal constitutional rights that they have amended the Constitution to expressly protect.
14th Amendment, Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

But regarding so-called, politically correct LGBT “rights," note that the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect politically correct LGBT “rights.” So this thread is another example of low-information, pro-LGBT activist California state government officials unthinkingly and wrongly using constitutionally unprotected LGBT “rights” to trump constitutionally enumerated protections, 1st Amendment-protected religious express and free speech in this example.

Also note that the Founding States had constitutionally prohibited both the federal and state governments from establishing protected / privileged classes as evidenced by the following clauses.

So pro-LGBT officials in both federal and state government are also effectively unthinkingly violating the Constitution’s prohibition on elite classes as much as they are violating 14A imo.

Finally, regarding Christians using their constitutional rights to protect themselves from unconstitutional harassment from both federal and state governments, low-information Christians first need to learn about those rights, and then consider that Acts 22:23-30 shows that Paul claimed his rights as a Roman citizen to save himself from being flogged.

64 posted on 07/01/2016 3:39:47 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf

Deny funds to any state or locality that discriminates against Christians and failing to recognize the Constitutional right of religious liberty.


65 posted on 07/01/2016 3:41:27 PM PDT by A_Former_Democrat (Legacy Kennedy . .give up YOUR job in the name of "Diversity")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

So there is no “Free Association” nor “Religious Concience”?


66 posted on 07/01/2016 3:42:45 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway - "Enjoy Yourself" ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
You already know the answer ...

Satan is embedded in American society and well ensconced in her pseudo-identity

67 posted on 07/01/2016 3:56:22 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true ... and it ticks people off)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

The owner should not compromise. At the very least, it should post many scripture passages forbidding homosexuality, including the entire account of Sodom and Gomorrah.


68 posted on 07/01/2016 4:35:49 PM PDT by castlegreyskull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom
The next class action suit the two gay men will file will be against the muslim dating website.

Are the gays looking to include sheep or goats in their sex life?

69 posted on 07/01/2016 4:36:53 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989; All

Understand that all of this is to destroy Western Civilization and its foundation, Biblical Christianity; once you accept that premise, all of the apparent inconsistencies of the Left, e.g., not only pro-homoerotic but also pro-mohammedan, make sense.


70 posted on 07/01/2016 4:42:04 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - JRRT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

They should either investigate relocating to another State, or shut down.

Either way, this is what the Left wants: Retreat or dissolve.

Since they hate States’ Rights, because they want us to have no escape from their godless communism, the way things are going, there will soon be no State that is safe for a Christian to live and work.

(Has anyone ever noticed that having one - just one - State that legalized prostitution did not destroy our national unity or identity, nor provide a slippery slope whereby all States had to follow suit? The Left’s vicious, hateful intolerance of even one State having a conservative position on marriage, in contrast, is proof positive that their agenda is not about preserving Constitutional rights, but about destroying them.)

If Christian Mingles stays in business, then they must remove “Christian” from their name, or be labelled heretics.


71 posted on 07/01/2016 4:50:43 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - JRRT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

It’s time to shrug.


72 posted on 07/01/2016 4:53:59 PM PDT by jimfree (In November 2016 my 15 y/o granddaughter will have more quality exec experience than Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom

I disagree: They are leftists, and the goal is to destroy Christianity and conservatism. Attacking fellow leftists (which is what devout Muslims are), and ones who hate Christianity and conservatism even more so, is counter-productive to the agenda being pursued.
Anyway, they would be scared of doing so. The Muslims fight back - and fight back often violently - unlike the Christians of today who are not violent and don’t fight at all.


73 posted on 07/01/2016 4:54:31 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - JRRT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #74 Removed by Moderator

To: rdl6989

They won’t sue MuslimMingle will they.


75 posted on 07/01/2016 5:01:55 PM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CMB_polarization

HRC = Human Rights Campaign. Didn’t realize Hitlery was owned by the homosexual agenda.


76 posted on 07/01/2016 5:51:53 PM PDT by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

They’re aiming to legalize child sodomy, as a human right.


77 posted on 07/01/2016 5:57:04 PM PDT by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: gawatchman

OMG! Another sodomistic agenda.


78 posted on 07/01/2016 5:58:55 PM PDT by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: knarf
forget the whole thing until President Trump is in office

I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for trump to do anything for social conservatives.

New York Values include a certain tolerance for homo causes, it would appear from his past history.

79 posted on 07/01/2016 6:00:45 PM PDT by steve86 (Prophecies of Maelmhaedhoc O'Morgair (Latin form: Malachy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

Ok...now do they have to match them to other homosexuals?


80 posted on 07/01/2016 6:22:35 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson