Posted on 07/07/2016 9:12:57 AM PDT by GilGil
Asked whether Clinton's testimony that she did not email "any classified material to anyone on my email" and "there is no classified material" was true, Comey responded, "No, there was classified material emailed."
"Secretary Clinton said she used one device. Was that true?" Gowdy asked, to which Comey answered, "She used multiple devices during the four years of her term as secretary of state."
Gowdy then asked whether it was true that Clinton, as she said, returned all work-related emails to the State Department.
"No, we found work-related emails, thousands that were not returned," Comey said.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
fwiw: I think comey has said there are other consequences from reprimand to termination that would apply to hildabeast’s email enterprise.
Hillary was just practicing Taqiyya to help out her Muslim buddies. It's all the rage nowadays doncha know...
But is he going to do anything.
A dark shadow has fallen on the FBI’s integrity.
Perjury.
Just like her husband.
Just ask him if hes been threatened or blackmailed.
Republicans in Congress desperately trying to preserve their undeserved reputation of being “tough on corruption”.
Even Gowdy sounding like the bulldog, we were told he was, until he gave Clinton a pass on the same things Comey and the Jusr-us Dept. did.
I sometimes listen to that gaggle of lyers and want to puke. Then I realise, they are only there because of US.
For those wo do not yet understand the fundamental factors driving Donald Trump’s popularity and revulsion with our political class I recommend spending just 5 or 10 minutes watching the preening, pompous horses asses at this congressional committee hearing.
Immmm in case you forgot she no longer eorks at state
GOWDY prosecuted that line of questioning quoted by Politico and which was used to introduce their column.
Comey is skating on one premise.. criminal intent. When cornered, he always comes back to that.
I’m sorry, but criminal intent is just not used in the case laws that apply to this fiasco, or used as a measure for endangering the security of people, places and things that secure Americans.
Case law now hinges on the fine line difference between prosecutable Gross Negligence and “extreme carelessness”.
When that line blurs, Comey circles back around to “criminal intent”.
Someone should ask Comey if he was bribed, blackmailed, or threatened by Clinton cronies.
BS.
Gowdy and every other sitting Republican told us that under this administration crimes will go unpunished.
These same guys are obliged to produce evidence that no longer exists, having been already destroyed or hidden, and never to be resurrected.
Still, these Republican led committees are charged and obligated to hold hearings and establish critically weakened investigations, in search for material evidence and witnesses they will never be allowed to see, hear or touch, so long as this administration is in power.
Gowdy and the boys are swimming in a system of historic corruption and under this administration nothing will change.
The most they can do would be to resign in protest, which hands the Congress over to the Left, who never quit until they are jailed.
The madness is just beginning. The US government is being run as a terrorist organization. It has destroyed entire nation states (Libya and Syria) simply for greed. Tens of thousands have been killed by this corrupt and evil government. Millions have been forced to flee this governments aftermath as refugees. Now due to the coming Presidential election, the demons controlling this government will be forced to turn their terrorism against US citizens to preserve their power. We have seen their sinister followers attack Americans simply supporting an alternative viable candidate who does not appear to be under their control. If it appears that the annointment of the demon Queen Hillary will fail, they will unleash hell upon the US. Get prepped. You know it’s coming.
Corruption... what my wife delicately refers to as the C-word which no one in Congress will mention.
For the sake of argument, why is it that a mens rea (joint union of act and intent) is not required? Why is the standard an almost civil element of gross negligence (or recklessness) rather than an ‘evil mind’?
What is the subject? Natinal security.
What is the concern? Keeping information from falling into the hands of those who do not have our best interests in mind.
Such information is valuable. As we have seen time and again, from commodities deals to assigning speaking gigs to her husband, from Haiti to their Clinton Foundation dealings—if you want to get Hillary’s attention, wave some green under nose.
If she did these things intentionally, and if we were at war (something she argues for constantly), she could be charged with treason.
I’m watching the washington dc 2 step right now. What a load of CRAP! There really is 2 levels of justice, 1 for those who are wealthy,well connected, & powerful and then for the rest of us, with the boot heel coming down on our throat/s before we get to see a court room to enter our plea/s. Just more theater for us peasants, so we do NOT rise up against our masters!
She’ll deny it was intentional.
https://therealstrategy.com/clinton-threatened-obama-go-go/#.V3PjIHmBssy.twitter
With this in mind, he could end up in ‘Fort Marcy Park’ with a gun in his ‘right’ hand and a bullet in the back of his head; or he could be coming out of a room into a ‘stairwell’ and have his ‘neck broken’ or he could be ‘lifting barbells’ and have them drop on his throat....
I'm not excusing any of the cowardice he shows, I'm just saying right now those people that have the ‘goods’ are not playing ‘nice’ in our government right now...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.