Posted on 07/08/2016 6:45:53 AM PDT by Kaslin
Last week, a young Christian male asked me a pretty direct question. He wanted to know whether I ever worried that my blunt commentary on social media was “turning people away from Christianity.” I thought it was an honest question. So I gave him an honest answer. I told him that I believe the problem is just the opposite of what he considers it to be. In other words, it isn’t occasional blunt commentary that turns people away from Christianity. It is the constant displays of Christian cowardice that make people both reticent to join and quick to attack us.
During the year 2000, when I was in the process of my conversion, there was only one prominent pastor I would even listen to on television. His name is Greg Laurie. He was bold without being rude. He was physical fit, casually but sharply dressed, and, to top it all off, he rode a motorcycle. And he could deliver the Gospel in a way that made even gang bangers weep and respond to an altar call in front of thousands at his Harvest Crusades in Anaheim Stadium.
In the fall of 2000, after I actually converted and joined a church I started to notice something unusual about my pastor. He was a lifelong Republican leading a liberal denomination. But the only time he ever talked about politics or social issues was when he quoted people like Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson. The blanket statement that always followed those quotes was that he wasn’t “that kind of Republican.” In fact, he was so afraid of his mostly-liberal congregation that he never told them what he actually believed. He only told them that he did not believe what all the other “mean Republicans” like Falwell and Robertson believed. It got old pretty fast. So I left his church and found another.
I wish I could say my next pastor was different. But he was not. He was privately appalled by the concept of same-sex marriage. But every time he broached the subject you could see him shaking from the pulpit. His voice would tremble as he tried to express his views in coded phrases. Unfortunately, the congregation was too obtuse to know what he was saying. When push came to shove, he failed to take a firm stand on Amendment One, which was North Carolina’s traditional marriage amendment. Clearly, he cowered out of fear of offending the droves of Obama supporters that helped pay his massive mortgage. I could no longer stomach his cowardice. So I left his church in frustration.
A personally anti-abortion pastor led another church I attended briefly. The problem was that his personal anti-abortion stance remained private and did not make its way into his sermons. In fact, he would not allow any discussion of the topic in his church for fear that someone in the congregation might have had an abortion. So he tossed any chance of redemption out the window for the post-abortive congregant. To make matters worse, he adamantly opposed pro-lifers showing pictures of aborted children in the public square. In other words, he was “pro life” so long as no one ever talked about it inside or outside the church. To make matters even worse, two of the members of his congregation later castigated pro-lifers for showing pictures of abortion on the UNC-Wilmington campus (where I teach). There is an obvious lesson here: If the pastor is a coward, it will always spread through the congregation.
It has taken several tries but I am happy that I have finally found a pastor and a church that is solidly pro-life and pro-family and not afraid to say it. I’m just sad that in the last sixteen years, I have learned that at least three quarters of the pastors who actually know what is right still lack the intestinal fortitude to take a stand for what they believe.
Many Christians are fed up with the capitulation of the church and respond in a way that is different from my chosen response. Rather than continuing to try and find a courageous pastor, they simply stop going to church. So this raises an interesting question: If Christians actually stop going to church because they are tired of pastors refusing to take a stand is it possible that some people never seriously consider Christianity in the first place for the same reasons?
I think I got the answer to that question nearly five years ago when I received an email from a troubled reader. Some of my regular readers may remember the story as I have written about it before. The man had lost his home and job and family and was about to commit suicide. Before he did, someone forwarded one of my columns to him. The column was one of those typical “blunt commentaries” where I was tearing into a corrupt administrator who was intentionally violating the rights of college students. The suicidal reader was captivated by the tone and content of the article and decided to start reading other columns from my archive.
After reading several hundred of my “blunt commentaries” he came across one talking about the New Testament and how to approach reading it. So he sat down and read the New Testament. Instead of killing himself, he converted to Christianity.
I had the pleasure of meeting this fine young man two years ago when I was speaking in Ohio. He is now very happy and living a productive life working in the conservative movement. I’ll never forget his explanation for previously refusing to consider Christianity. It is a paraphrase but he basically told me the following: “For a long time I would never consider converting because I thought you had to be weak and passive in order to be a Christian.”
Let that sink in for a minute. The next time you self-censor you may be hurting Christianity, not helping it. We need brave young warriors not spineless “evangelists” who are more concerned about being liked than influencing the culture.
In a nutshell, Jesus was not Mr. Rogers. He had little tolerance for the smug moral superiority of those who grasp the truth but lack the faith and courage necessary to defend it.
Sickening, isn’t it? When you think of the pantheon of Christian warriors - Alfred the Great, Charles Martel, Jon Don, Horatio Nelson and a thousand others - you gotta wonder where we went wrong. Where’s our Cromwell and New Model Army?
I am so blessed. Since becoming a Christian, I’ve attended about 4 churches through my life where I considered myself a member. (usually about 10 years at each) I can’t think of too many instances where the leaders acted in a pansy fashion. What I do see among the younger men and women though is a serious lack of testosterone.
They argue online for liberal beliefs or a form of nihilism, yet claim to be believers.
One is currently arguing with a friend of mine that since Clarence Thomas was found not guilty or harassment and Clinton had charges dropped, she’s not guilty too. What a mental midget trying to make that correlation.
I live in a liberal state. We have a local pastor who does a short daily radio commentary on a talk station. He doesn’t back down at all.
AMEN!
He means "reluctant."
A church leader can be strong and clear on issues and never mention an official or person by name. It’s astounding, for instance, how little church people know about abortion. So describe it and ask people to vote for life.
I don’t care much for pulpits focused on current events and issues. Mike Adams searched until he found one focused on anti-abortion and anti-progessivism and he was happy. That’s how I’m reading him anyway. In person, I expect he’d explain himself better.
In my opinion, the whole counsel of God equals the entire bible. An honest pastor going through the bible will not find occasion each week to bash the progressivist liberals.
Believe it or not there’s lots of other issues addressed in the bible. Sometimes anti-abortion fits directly, sometimes it might fit as an illustration of another issue, but lots of times it doesn’t fit at all.
At some point we have to be honest with the bible. Forcing every passage into our political sentiments is us telling the bible what to teach.
Well there's your problem right there.
Greg Laurie has a special gift from God, which is to be able to preach to the lost rather than to the choir.
Many churches are becoming laodicean.
Don’t forget the standard liberal line, “Jesus was a liberal”.
I do not think Adams was saying that he wanted to see more politics in his church. But generally speaking, people who are politically liberal tend to be theologically liberal. Subjects like abortion and sex outside marriage are theological/moral issues that resonate politically, but are not strictly political.
Jesus was neither liberal or conservative.
And dead spiritual wise.
See my #26 about this article.
That said, this article is not about Greg Laurie. I’ve never heard him preach or been to one of his events. I hope to some day.
Luke 12 is heavy duty. It’s actually overwhelming in it’s bluntness.
Scouts Out!
I imagine he’d explain himself better in person. He gave the impression in this article that anti-progessivism was the focus of his church search. In my opinion.
>>Why go to church if it’s no different than the secular world?
If you’re a Christian, I believe you should do the soul-searching you need to figure out where you belong. Currently, I belong to a VERY liberal congregation. I feel called to be there. Because I’m liberal? Absolutely not. I frequently consider moving to a church that is more in line with my beliefs. But I think I have been called to help the people at my church. For a long time, it was just general support of those in need, but now I feel my calling is to educate them.
Liberals who know me are always surprised to find out I am a conservative. (”But you’re so NICE!”) They think of all conservatives as “haters.” I have been involved in more than one discussion that turned to the “evils of the tea party.” When I ask how many tea partiers they know, the answer is always none. Then I tell them they know at least one: me. They are shocked. Because they base their attitudes on the echo chamber of liberalism and media that they are immersed in, not in facts, experience, or data.
We have a brand new ultra liberal minister who has been giving lots of sermons about racism recently. Always about how put upon blacks are and slavery, slavery, slavery. I am not afraid to speak up and educate him. But I will do so in a polite, Christian, conservative manner. I pray for strength to do so without losing my temper.
This Sunday should prove interesting.
I never heard of ANY mainline christian denomination refusing money from anyone?
So not sure what your point is?
Non-denominational churches run the gamut being outright fraud charlatans to some of the most active, fearless proclaimers of the gospel...
One of the reason they are non-denominational is they aren't under the thumb of some liberal hierarchy of men dictating what they can or cannot preach from the pulpit...
“He gave the impression in this article that anti-progessivism was the focus of his church search. In my opinion.”
I’m still not quite grasping why this would impugn him. Are there not a host of issues within progressivism -as a worldview- that are strongly anti-Christian? Will these theological differences not obviously translate into political differences?
Sometimes the bible can offer a broader view on an issue, too, than we might think it deserves.
We see the abortion problem today and say eek! let’s concentrate on it because it’s such a distinct, obvious evil. But it’s rooted in a larger problem, one that we might be inclined — polite people not nosing into anyone else’s business and not wanting anyone to nose into ours as we are — to overlook.
The lament that closes out the Old Testament seems to be key here. The hearts of the “fathers” need to be turned to the “sons” and vice versa, or the Lord will strike the land with a curse. Have not even Christian families grown more distant within, as we think of it as something like Dr. Dobson vs. Dr. Spock, rather than Jesus Christ against the devil?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.