Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Foreign Policy Advisor: 'Americans Are Fed Up With the Bullxxx'
Spiegel ^ | 7/16/16 | Staff

Posted on 07/16/2016 9:39:28 PM PDT by P.O.E.

In an interview with Spiegle, Donald Trump advisor Mike Flynn explains why the presumptive Republican Party presidential candidate admires authoritarian leaders and considers the US foreign policy of recent years to be a disaster.

(Excerpt) Read more at spiegel.de ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2016issues; flynn; trump2016
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
Worth a read, IMHO
1 posted on 07/16/2016 9:39:28 PM PDT by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

Title pretty well sums it up. We are indeed fed up.


2 posted on 07/16/2016 9:45:11 PM PDT by A_perfect_lady (They aren't being radicalized; they're being activated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

Indeed, we are, my friend. We know it when we hear it.
Can’t always do anything about it though.


3 posted on 07/16/2016 9:47:16 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

So mote it be


4 posted on 07/16/2016 9:51:57 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("You really haven't achieved Communism until toilet paper becomes a luxury item.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

Agreed. Very good interview with Gen Flynn.


5 posted on 07/16/2016 9:52:44 PM PDT by jazminerose (oective)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

Yes, good article.


6 posted on 07/16/2016 9:56:08 PM PDT by bluejean (The lunatics are running the asylum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

Thanks for posting this article.


7 posted on 07/16/2016 10:02:11 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

Wish the General would give that interview in America, maybe on 60 minutes and make their heads spin.


8 posted on 07/16/2016 10:23:48 PM PDT by pangaea6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.
An outstanding read, and thanks for posting! A taste:

We have to look at the cost of resourcing the US military around the world. How is that cost incurred, and how is that cost paid for? I'll give you an example. The Chinese get over 40 percent of their oil from the Middle East through the Persian Gulf, but have you ever seen a Chinese aircraft carrier sitting inside the Persian Gulf? For at least 40 years, the United States of America has been guaranteeing Chinese energy supplies. Sitting here today, the US provides funds to, honest to God, 99 percent of the countries on the planet. We even give North Korea humanitarian aid. We give them food, and God knows what they do with it. They probably feed it to the crooks in the headquarters. This is not about an antagonistic relationship with Germany or NATO. This is about looking and examining what the needs are going forward for the 21st century and who is going pay for it.

This is a very good interview, and the editor who wrote the sub-heading about Trump liking authoritarian leaders didn't have a clue. "History is not going to be kind to the last 16 years." Yeah, buddy.

9 posted on 07/16/2016 10:33:56 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

Great article and Trump is 100% correct - as usual.


10 posted on 07/16/2016 11:03:56 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

“History is not going to be kind to the last 16 years.”

George W has problem as history unfolds....


11 posted on 07/17/2016 2:59:24 AM PDT by Recon Dad (Force Recon Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

“History is not going to be kind to the last 16 years.”

George W has problem as history unfolds....


12 posted on 07/17/2016 2:59:31 AM PDT by Recon Dad (Force Recon Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad
I agree. Voted for the man twice. He did the right thing in protecting this country and responding to 9/11 (a lot of it, anyway). Yet, he ignored the economy and he appeased Democrats. NOT tough on immigration, and the TSA/DHS were the low points of his tenure, IMO.

However, his buddy-buddying with the Slick and Jeb and the GOPe lately is completely unforgivable to me. His ignoring of Trump and those who put him where he is right now is equally deflating.

How could I have been so wrong?

13 posted on 07/17/2016 3:06:36 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
-- How could I have been so wrong? --

Don't think you are exceptional that way. For me, I look at the alternatives (Gore, Kerry), and the choice is clear, but my eyes were pretty well opened when GWB nominated Harriet Miers for SCOTUS. I figured it would take 50 years to be able to form a position on whether the Iraq war decision was good for the US (and good for Iraq), but in hindsight, gave too much weight to US commitment to the project. After less than 20 years it appears to have been a disaster, a bad decision.

Not saying it's an acuracte stereotype, but I see GWB as an arrogant frat-boy born with a silver spoon in his mouth. He's as committed to NWO as his daddy was and is.

14 posted on 07/17/2016 3:42:16 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad

I refuse to feel bad about voting for W.
Choice was Gore and Kerry.
I think we did the best we could with the cards we were delt.


15 posted on 07/17/2016 3:46:23 AM PDT by hadaclueonce (This time it is serious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

I don’t know that history will be all that kind to GWB as regards to 911. It happened eight months into his administration. I doubt Trump will have sloppy homeland defense that far into his administration.


16 posted on 07/17/2016 3:48:47 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.
Germany currently spends 1.2% of their GDP on defense.The US pays 3.3% of GDP for defense (world bank figures) but we have global commitments that Germany does not have.

German per capita GDP is $47K. US per capita GDP is 56K.

I'd say that in the interest of fairness Germany needs to at least double their defense spending.

17 posted on 07/17/2016 4:03:47 AM PDT by InABunkerUnderSF (ABM - Anyone But McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

BTTT


18 posted on 07/17/2016 4:25:12 AM PDT by varon (There's always room for one more on the hanging tree.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
How could I have been so wrong?

W had some weaknesses to start with, but I think he went bad in office. When you hold hands with the Saudi scumbags (the elite's preferred version of ISIS) some of their evil leaches into you. It's the exact same reason they want to teach "moderate" Islam to children.

19 posted on 07/17/2016 4:37:51 AM PDT by palmer (Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet over to foreign enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: InABunkerUnderSF
I'd say that in the interest of fairness Germany needs to at least double their defense spending.

To what end? You said yourself that Germany does not have the global commitments that the U.S. has taken on.

20 posted on 07/17/2016 5:03:20 AM PDT by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson