Clinton aide on email leaks: 'I don't think they're done'

The Hill ^ | July 26th, 2016 | Peter Schroeder

[ncfool]

PHILADELPHIA — Hillary Clinton's campaign is bracing for the possibility of more damaging emails being leaked to the public as the presidential campaign enters its home stretch.

Jennifer Palmieri, communications director for Hillary for America, said it’s possible that more emails will be released at a time designed to inflict maximum political pain to Democrats. “The WikiLeaks leak was obviously designed to hurt our convention,” she told reporters. “I don’t think they’re done. That’s how they operate. “We can’t know, but it’s part of the reason that we wanted people to understand our belief that the Russians are behind this,” she said. “People need to understand — when these leaks happen — what they’re designed to do.”

Palmieri added that the Clinton campaign was not worried about its own email security.

The first day of the Democratic National Convention was upended by the WikiLeaks release over the weekend of more than 20,000 internal emails from the Democratic National Committee (DNC). Some of those emails suggested that officials at the DNC, which is supposed to be neutral during the party’s presidential primary, worked against Sen. Bernie Sanders

(I-Vt.) and favored Clinton, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee

[Graybeard58]

Sorry, Jules. NOTHING will result in her indictment. NOTHING! Comey and Lynch will just stall until PARDONMAGEDDON comes on January 19.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I believe if Assange had solid proof that Hillary had someone murdered (Not that far fetched), she might be indicted.

[mancini]

Oh don’t worry, we know what they’re designed to do. They think we’re all stupid.

[Kenton]

“The WikiLeaks leak was obviously designed to hurt our convention,” she told reporters. “I don’t think they’re done. That’s how they operate.

Hold on - does that make WikiLeaks part of the "Vast Right-wing Conspiracy"?

Probably not, but it does look like somebody's pinned a target to the back of Hillary's Nehru jacket, and timing, as you know, is everything.

Poor Hillary, she must have thought that nobody read Saul Alinsky beside her. But somebody else did, and here they are, weakening her a little bit every day.

[cgbg]

It would be hilarious if it was some teenager in their basement that did the hacks.

I just hope they don’t get caught—but the “Russians” claim is patently absurd.

[vette6387]

Yeah, watch this, it will make your day, fried chicken eating and all!
I especially liked the references to slavery.

http://ijr.com/2016/07/647824-black-lives-matter-take-in-between-bites-of-chicken/?utm_campaign=ods&utm_content=humor&utm_medium=owned&utm_source=facebook&utm_term=ijamerica

[Hot Tabasco]

it’s possible that more emails will be released at a time designed to inflict maximum political pain to Democrats.

That's an admission that damaging emails are out there......LOL!

[mancini]

I would almost feel better about it if it were the Israelis. All along I have been wondering if whoever did it has any RNC emails. Still, I’ve been enjoying the fireworks.

[trebb]

Didn't crooked lying Hillary claim no knowledge of this scandal during her 60 minutes interview. Can she ever open her mouth without lying?

Yep and folks on FOX called her either a liar or so incompetent as to make one's head spin (pictures of "The Exorcist" running in my head)...

[Pollard]

Macho-ism, masculinity? You think putin wants to deal with 4/8 years of a woman cackling at him?

[Ghost of SVR4]

Its being speculated that the next dump involves HRC using her position at state to use our military like mercenaries, for a rather large donation of course. There are other hints about that “missing 6 Billion dollars at State while she was there.

[ExTexasRedhead]

Any anti-semitic comments? We know how Hitlery loves to spew negative comments about Jews except her hordes of Capo cohorts who really aren’t Jews. Capos would send their own to the ovens. God will sort them all out one day.

[notdownwidems]

The Russians didn't write the emails, people in the DNC did.

Bingo! Not a single one of these scumbags have denied anything that was in them emails!

[dmcnash]

Here are your Russian suspects.

[marstegreg]

I have yet to hear one good plausible explanation as to WHY the Russians would want to sink Hillary’s chance to be POTUS.

_________________________________________________________

I was wondering the same thing. I don’t really think the Russians are pro Trump. What I would like to know is why they are anti Hillary. She is untrustworthy, lies, cheats and steals. So I want to know how she burned the Russians during her tenure as SOS to get them so hot-under-the-collar about her. That’s where the answer can be found.

[bgill]

Unless the local evening news talks about it endlessly, it didn’t happen.

[left that other site]

Indeed. HE will.

[fhayek]

Your reasoning makes sense to me.

[lodi90]

Putin is just trying to keep his adversaries distracted and in chaos. Then he has a free hand to operate. I have no doubt he really prefers America hating doormats like Obama & Hillary to an American patriot like Trump. I don’t buy the Trump-Putin bromance idea at all. Total campaign season hot air, IMO.

[hecticskeptic]

Jennifer Palmieri, communications director for Hillary for America, said it’s possible that more emails will be released at a time designed to inflict maximum political pain to Democrats. “The WikiLeaks leak was obviously designed to hurt our convention,” she told reporters. “I don’t think they’re done. That’s how they operate. “We can’t know, but it’s part of the reason that we wanted people to understand our belief that the Russians are behind this,” she said. “People need to understand — when these leaks happen — what they’re designed to do.”

So Jenny, your first statement can be agreed with and as for the second and third, you would know since all you have to do is look and see what Wikileaks hasn’t released yet…… but Jenny, help me out on how you then made the connection to the Russians? So tight a conclusion in fact that “this is the reason you want the people to understand your belief that the Russians are behind this”? When you make it up as you go, should you be surprised when nobody believes anything you say?

[henkster]

Great point about Mossad. I hadn’t considered that angle.