Posted on 07/26/2016 5:29:59 PM PDT by detective
The first 57 seconds of James O’Keefe’s latest undercover video interview, of a Clinton delegate from California, confirms what many have long suspected: Hillary Clinton’s real goal of complete and total confiscation of all firearms from every American citizen is being hidden behind benign and persuasive phrases such as “common sense gun control” and “protect our families,” etc.
It also reveals what happens when the “useful idiot” in the video learns that she has been exposed for what she is: a mouthpiece for the movement to disarm America and ultimately turn it into a totalitarian state.
Most importantly it reveals just how closely the Clinton campaign is following Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals in its attempt to install a totalitarian government (impossible without total gun confiscation) in the United States.
(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...
I wonder what James Earl Ray would have to say.
No doubt. GOPee not far behind...
I am sure the millions of AR’s sold in the last years were brought to just turn them into the government along with the billions of rounds of ammo also.
With her supreme court,it should be easy.
Of course it is, it’s the only way to make America safe for international socialism (and for all those new Muslim refugees).
She can 'want' in one hand, and drop the lower half of her crusty pantsuit, squat down and defecate into the other, and we'll all see which hand gets full faster. Americans have been 'arming up' in record numbers of late, and she wants to 'go *THERE*'?
The woman is obviously demented...
the infowarrior
Yeah, overturning Heller would be about as easy as overturning Roe v. Wade. Neither is gonna happen...
the infowarrior
And so beginneth CW-II.
Note to the Vagina Candidate: Molon labe!
Yes, she is. That's why she'd actually try it.
Mary Bayer, I’d hit it.
This has been the plan since 1962 when Thomas J Dodd and Emanual Cellar called for the registration of ONLY HANDGUNS. “Long guns will not be affected!” they said.
That didn’t last long till they were demanding registration of all firearms, then bans on small handguns, bans of ALL handguns, now bans on rifles.
And THIS is how it would be done...READ AND HEED!
Nelson T. ‘Pete’ Shields
Founder of Handgun Control, Inc.
“I’m convinced that we have to have federal legislation to build on. We’re going to have to take one step at a time, and the first step is necessarily — given the political realities — going to be very modest.
Of course, it’s true that politicians will then go home and say, ‘This is a great law. The problem is solved.’ And it’s also true that such statements will tend to defuse the gun-control issue for a time.
So then we’ll have to strengthen that law, and then again to strengthen that law, and maybe again and again. Right now, though, we’d be satisfied not with half a loaf but with a slice. Our ultimate goal — total control of handguns in the United States — is going to take time.
My estimate is from seven to ten years. The problem is to slow down the increasing number of handguns sold in this country. The second problem is to get them all registered. And the final problem is to make the possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition — except for the military, policemen, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors — totally illegal.”
-Pete Shields, Chairman and founder, Handgun Control Inc., “A Reporter At Large: Handguns,” The New Yorker, July 26, 1976, 57-58
“Yes, I’m for an outright ban [on handguns].”
-Pete Shields, Chairman emeritus, Handgun Control, Inc., 60 Minutes interview
Around 1984, Handgun Control Inc, (now the Brady Center) came out in favor of a ban on semi-auto rifles and shotguns.
.
What Good Can a Handgun Do Against an Army.....?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2312894/posts
I lugged around an M-16 for 22 years. Never thought I’d ever have need to pick one up again after I left the Army. My “government” once again convinced me two weeks ago that I needed one (AR-15). It’s been a while, baby.
I just can’t see a total ban on weapons ever happening. Maybe a reinstatement of the assault weapons ban perhaps. Possibly a tax or government caused ammo shortages, but a total confiscation attempt would be national suicide.
They can have my 81 mm mortar tube when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
If they ever come for the guns you might as well turn them in bullets first, because they’re going to kill you anyway.
How does she do that? How does anyone do that?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.