Posted on 07/29/2016 5:13:38 AM PDT by Olog-hai
Hillary Clinton devoted part of her speech Thursday night to guns, telling the Democrat National Convention, “If we’re serious about keeping our country safe, we…can’t afford to have a president who's in the pocket of the gun lobby.”
“I’m not here to repeal the Second Amendment. I’m not here to take away your guns. I just don’t want you to be shot by someone who shouldn’t have a gun in the first place,” Clinton said.
She once again called for “common-sense reforms” to “keep guns out of the hands of criminals, terrorists and all other who would do us harm,” but she did not offer specifics. …
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
‘I’m Not Here to Take Away Your Guns’
And yet all she does is talk about Australia.
A lying criminal, POS unfit for any office.
Liar.
I’m not here to take away your guns.
Pants on fire.
I just don’t want you to be shot by someone who shouldn’t have a gun in the first place,”
And that's why you have an ARMED security detail, paid for by We the People ... who don't get one, so we have to depend on our own resources. We'll keep our Second Amendment, and our guns, and you can pound sand up your ass.
That name sounds familiar. Kind of reminds me of "Secret State Police" ...
“..slowly tighten the noose until the majority of people can’t own anything more lethal than BB guns.”
Details, I want details! How many cops/Feds, how many HUMMV’s, how many search warrants, how many states cede sovereignty to Washington diktats, and how will the powers that be deal with massive national noncompliance?
Govags are no longer invisible minions of the state. Mr. Google knows where they live & they don’t like kissing their families goodbye every time they report for duty.
We are not helpless serfs!
“I’m not here to repeal the Second Amendment. I’m not here to take away your guns. I just don’t believe anyone should own a gun. It’s common sense,” said Clinton.
By the time she takes away our guns, we won’t have freedom of speech either.
I don’t buy her its for the Little People spiel.
Let her give up her armed bodyguards first.
Somehow I don’t believe she’s ok with me keeping my AR-15’s.
Yup.
And with Clintonian parsing, it means YOU will be disarmed.
Thugs and Islamic terrorists can carry all the weapons they want.
Just like in Europe.
Thanks but no thanks.
"Read my lips, no new taxes".
I will not take away your guns because
I will not take away your guns until
I take away your guns!
Hey DNC, I am available for speech writing ... ;-)
If Clintoon becomes our Potus, she will disarm us and make us like the poor guy below, running for his life! His crime, being a Trump supporter in San Jose earlier this year. He was run down by a Somali Islamic. The worthless Liberal San Jose Mayor and LaRaza police chief made sure their cops didn’t stop the violence against Trump supporters.
‘Rats want guns to kill others. Conservatives need guns to defend themselves from ‘Rat predators.’(Paladin2)
“I”am not here to take your guns” but my goons are.
“...the confiscation will be by attrition. Much of it will be by state and local police, who, in NJ, NY [CT] and California already confiscate personal firearms.”
First of all, confiscation is an act of the state, attrition is a process over time. There is no confiscation without registration, and Congress will never pass a law creating a national gun registry. It’s third rail deadly to even try.
Each of those states have experienced massive noncompliance with ex post facto turn in laws. State police chiefs growl at the cameras, but no one’s sent out the paddy wagons just yet.
There have been attempts to confiscate guns when a FOID holder dies, but huge blowback resulted and in a nutshell, governors aren’t in a hurry to call out the National Guard & impose martial law.
Confiscations which did occur in the New Orleans area after Katrina resulted in a backlash of laws in other states forbidding authorities to confiscate just because of a hurricane or such.
Your serve.
;^)
Think “Stasi”.
I know the meaning of "confiscation" and "attrition." And I agree with you that forcing mass compliance would be problematic today.
If you have no problem with Hillary's attitude toward the second amendment, or have no concern about the government effort to somehow get guns out of the hands of the public, that's fine with me. I laid out what I think the future holds, whether Hillary is leading the charge this generation, or some other despot 20, 50 or more years from now. No country stands up to the passage of time, and the USA is not immune. Your bluster dies when you do. Mine too, when I do.
KGB ... Gestapo ...
You better not be, Bitch, because You NEVER will!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.